User talk:Theseasons

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

Also see

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to NCIS (TV series). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (✉) 03:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at NCIS: Los Angeles. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article
  dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards
  .
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's
  Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
  .

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 20:57, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 17:27, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:59, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've returned readding a table about the characters. Please stop while you're at it. It's been refuted in the past. Don't continue to

As was explained above, there should not even be a cast table in NCIS: Los Angeles. The column you are adding to the table that is there, takes up far too much of the existing space, causing distortion of the existing columns. There is simply not enough space in the article for the column. If you wish to add this column, it should be done to a table in List of NCIS: Los Angeles characters, but certainly not in the main article. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:42, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Criminal Minds. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 16:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Criminal Minds. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Davejohnsan (talk) 18:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ron Kulpa seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:55, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have added the cast list in a template format. It was reverted multiple times as of now. If you want to reinstate it, please open a discussion at Talk:Chicago Med before making rather than reading it a few weeks later again and edit war over it. Thank you. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 13:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Template:Disney Princess. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Disney Princess for the official list, template reflects that. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Theseasons. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kristen Stewart. DMacks (talk) 22:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Knock it off or this is not going to end well. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:56, 4 February 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Theseasons (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #17853 was submitted on Mar 22, 2017 19:42:57. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:42, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, that's odd, since the log for this account shows that it has never been blocked. 80.168.196.82 (talk) 15:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 15:44, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A quick look at your editing history is raising some serious questions as to whether or not you are

WP:HERE. I suggest you knock it off and start making useful contributions. Otherwise your next block is likely to be indefinite. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:46, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Please be sure to check article edit histories before making unsourced changes. As was indicated in this edit, less than 3 hours ago, a source is required for this change. That means a source explicitly supporting the claim. --AussieLegend (✉) 21:08, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I request that if you were to remove the season 8 portion of the chart on the Hawaii Five-0 Cast and Characters Page because it's to early to add that you re-add the characters to the recurring characters/recurring characters chart, they should not be left out just because they're in between position moves. I also request that you move the info boxes and related info about said characters to the recurring characters section. Also, to keep the consistency you should remove the "Series 8 portion of the recurring characters chart until then I will undo your edits once again. Thanks --TheDoctorWho (talk) 05:09, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hawaii Five-0 (2010 TV series). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blaise Ilsley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Theseasons. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Theseasons. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Ziva David, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Praxidicae (talk) 23:02, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —El Millo (talk) 01:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kelly Preston. Your addition of "cremated" to her infobox was unacceptable. Your talk page is filled with warnings and nearly every one of your edits has been reverted. You need to seriously consider your purpose here. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:13, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]