User talk:Tim Isaksson

Thank you,

Stefan2. Duly noted. I will henceforth upload such images only after the intended page for use has been published. /Tim Isaksson (talk) 18:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Wingwatchers were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

encyclopedic manner

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
  Draft:Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment
  and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  Draft:Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wingwatchers (talk) 19:22, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you have shown an interest in articles related to psychology.

• How to write a psychology article
• Psychology tasks that need doing
• Psychology portal

If you make big improvements to a psychology-related article, or small improvements to many, you will earn our lasting gratitude, or even a Barnstar. I hope you enjoy your time on Wikipedia.

Xurizuri (talk) 11:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tol was:

This submission reads more like an

encyclopedic manner

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noise (human judgment) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Noise (human judgment), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 14:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Wingwatchers (talk) 00:10, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wingwatchers was:

This submission reads more like an

encyclopedic manner

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft reads too much like an essay. The text has to be converted into prose format rather than bullet points, and avoid naming sections with over-extended descriptions, like "What noise is and its relationship to bias."

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noise (human judgment) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Noise (human judgment), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wingwatchers (talk) 04:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As reviewing administrator, I think I should advise you that we are not likely to accept two articles with overlapping content, one about the book, and one about the specific subject of the book, presented according to that book. There are two possible directions: keep some information about the theoretical approach in the article in the book and remove the other, or write a minimal article on the book and link it to the general article for discussion of the theory. I would very strongly suggest focussing on the article on the book; I have checked the references in the article on the subject, and most of the references are either by Kahneman, or are about human error in general.

The function of a reviewer is to predict whether the article will pass AfD. I doubt that the article on the theory will. It might be useful if rewritten as a general article on human error, not highlighting his theoretical approach.I am of course aware of Daniel Kahneman as a very famous economist, but that would not justify a separate article unless there were multiple other significant works discussing specifically this particular approach. DGG ( talk ) 17:23, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DGG,

I see. I will focus on the book article. I actually began by writing just one article, but then another reviewer suggested splitting it into the two. Of course, that first draft was more about the concept than the book, so I now see that there was a problem from the get go. Thanks for your time

Tim Isaksson (talk) 07:15, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As it happens, I've now read the book and I'm quite impressed. There might be enough for 2, but I agree you should work on the book first, and then see if you can write a bio which just mentions the book among other aspects. DGG ( talk ) 10:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DGG,

Sorry for my late reply. Nice that you like the book. Alright, yes I may return to this in the future. Tim Isaksson (talk) 12:09, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Tim Isaksson. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:44, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]