User talk:Tjking131

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:MattDiBendetto Sunoco 150 Cropped.jpeg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:MattDiBendetto Sunoco 150 Cropped.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

48 hours after 03:18, 21 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 03:18, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]


File copyright problem with File:Michael Jackson 2009.jpg

Thank you for uploading

image description page
.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 03:08, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Dave Taylor Cropped.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Dave Taylor Cropped.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

48 hours after 23:27, 29 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 23:27, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]


File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Mike Skinner Cropped.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Mike Skinner Cropped.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

48 hours after 23:39, 29 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 23:39, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The article

references
.


If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable sources, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide sources within 10 days, you may request the article be undeleted when you have sources. Airplaneman 00:06, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

June 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Michael Jackson. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Unless and until a court of law rules on this, manslaughter is merely an opinion. Please don't replace that content. Rodhullandemu 20:39, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article

source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ϢereSpielChequers 14:03, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The article

source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 22:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

September 2010

chat 22:31, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Excuse me...

I left a note in the talkpage of Mistico stating that Mistico should be changed to Sin Cara in six months to a year. Why did you ignore the note and changed it anyway?--

talk) 20:45, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Leo Kruger

The article

reliable source
that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SwisterTwister talk 23:58, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate

combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Papacha (talk) 21:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Don't speculate on a person's future status please; it busts up all manner of rules. Just stick to the facts and source your work when and *if* it happens, okay? Thanks. Papacha (talk) 21:53, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bill Nye. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 00:16, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Bill Nye. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Noom talk stalk 00:21, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]