User talk:Tonk111

Hi Tonk111! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:07, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm My Lord. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of terrorist incidents in India without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ML ⁹¹¹ 07:16, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. About Taj Mahal, I could find this as well. What do you think of that? Ahmad^Talk 20:29, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is okay. But the objective of Oak as I see isn't to describe Taj, but to claim it for Hinduism. Not that it isn't visible from his book's title. Since you have a better book not trying to push any agenda; it is alright. Tonk111 (talk) 20:33, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, added the new reference. Thanks for your attention, I didn't know that. Ahmad^Talk 20:43, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Calling someone actually gay might not be insulting but using it as a retort is. And what he said "Prophet Muhammad was the first homosexual". Obviously historically baseless, homosexuality has existed long before him. This is an insult, nothing more. Tonk111 (talk) 10:10, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tonk111. You have new messages at Talk:Kamlesh_Tiwari#Names of Suspect being taken.
Message added 10:54, 19 October 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DBigXrayᗙ 10:54, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--DBigXrayᗙ 11:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tonk111. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring.
Message added 06:26, 20 October 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Administrator had warned you for your behaviour and edits. Pictogram voting wait.svg Warned. Three reverts are allowed, so no violation on the 3RR end. Please continue to discuss on the article talk page. That having been said, Tonk111, some of your edits are highly problematic for a recently deceased person — you should be aware that you are a risking an imminent topic ban (or at the very least, an article ban), or other discretionary sanctions, if these violations were to persist.