User talk:Torygreen84
Welcome!
|
November 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Opinion Polling
Would you be able to explain why you changed the opinion polling section on the
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
could somebody make a Template of Defunct Indian political parties Thanks because I don't know how to do it. Torygreen84 (talk) 03:04, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Requesting the creation of templates is done at Wikipedia:Requested templates. Primefac (talk) 04:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
November 2016
Proposed deletion of Citizens' Movement (New Zealand)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Citizens' Movement (New Zealand) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence given that they meet WP:Notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
July 2017
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Christian politics in South Africa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No actual content, seemingly abandoned draft.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robofish (talk) 22:49, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
SSM
Please be a little more careful in adding MPs' views to their article. An article that already states that the subject opposes SSM does not then need another sentence saying they'll be voting no - of course they will. Also, be careful with the VoteCompass thing, which was an opt-in survey and thus not remotely statistically valid (we cannot categorically say "X electorate supports/opposes SSM", only "opt-in survey VoteCompass results from this electorate showed majority support/opposition ..."). Also, you added to a few articles (Jason Clare, Ed Husic, Chris Bowen) that they supported SSM while their electorates were majority against it, and this isn't even what VoteCompass said. Only one electorate, Maranoa, had a majority opposed. Blaxland, Chifley and McMahon just didn't get to 50% (there was a don't know option as well). Frickeg (talk) 10:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Torygreen84. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Conservative Party (UK) leadership election (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:21, 17 December 2018 (UTC)