User talk:Transcendentalstate

Hello, Transcendentalstate, and

• If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
• Always
  sign your posts
  on talk pages with ~~~~ so others will know who left which comments.
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Our
  simplified ruleset
• How to
  write a great article
• The
  picture tutorial
• The handy Manual of Style
• And finally, remember to
  be bold
  in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a

Happy editing!

User:Interiot/Tool2/code.js

–Sango123 19:55, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Thanks for agreeing. I've seen people add statements like those and eventually they are almost always deleted due to the original research policy. :) And thanks for the userpage comment. Welcome, by the way! -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 00:26, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Actually, I'm glad to see someone working on some of the new summer television series. Your account seems to be new, but you seem to be catching on to things very quickly, having accomplished quite a bit already. As for hardcoded infoboxes on Veronica Mars character articles, I have no idea why that is, as someone made a

Centering is ok for a field, but not so much for the options in that field. Better they align left. –

Talk | contribs) 20:50, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

That it is, that it is, but it also gets rid of the annoying empty inbetween space caused by center aligning. It's ok to center if your different sections are titled up top. Doing it with side-placed titles causes the fileds with a smaller number of options to get stuck in the middle. Works better when it's right next to the field. –

Talk | contribs

)

I'm adding categories for all Vanished articles, including one each for the actors and characters. Robert Moore 02:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was messaged several times by some well meaning folks and some robots. Some folks have questioned a few photos I uploaded from press kits and labelled as fair use. I think on the whole that it is just better if I leave the photo uploading to those who know better. I took down their messages not because they weren't appreciated, but because they were red and unsightly. They can be seen in the history of this article should someone be dying to read them.Transcendentalstate 17:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are the nicest person on Wikipedia, myself included. Thank you Ice9Tea 00:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated

1. Nathan Fields - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:05, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nathan Fields has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant sources, no real claim of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

Template:Donnellynav has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 09:09, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Transcendentalstate,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Laszlo Dubrovay for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. (t) Josve05a (c) 19:23, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 21:38, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

File permission problem with File:AndrewSkeet.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AndrewSkeet.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:03, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Transcendentalstate. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Peter Petrelli

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Peter Petrelli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Petrelli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Indagate (talk) 11:38, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Karen Vick

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Karen Vick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Vick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Maxx-♥ talk and coffee ☕ 12:39, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Juliet O'Hara for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juliet O'Hara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juliet O'Hara until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Maxx-♥ talk and coffee ☕ 13:17, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carlton Lassiter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carlton Lassiter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlton Lassiter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Maxx-♥ talk and coffee ☕ 13:19, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Henry Spencer (Psych) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henry Spencer (Psych) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Spencer (Psych) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Maxx-♥ talk and coffee ☕ 13:25, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]