User talk:TrishaHoffman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Your submission at
Articles for creation

Articles for Creation
. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Welcome!

Hello, TrishaHoffman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to

talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Shearonink (talk) 01:19, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Adding references can be easy

reliable sources for the content you add to Wikipedia. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability
. Adding a well formatted references is very easy to do.

  1. While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "Cite".
  2. Click on it.
  3. Then click on "Templates"
  4. Choose the most appropriate template and fill in as many details as you can. This will add a well formatted reference that is helpful in case the website link (web URL) becomes inactive (dead/link rot) after some time.

You can read more about it on Help:Edit toolbar or see this video File:RefTools.ogv.
Hope this helps,Shearonink (talk) 01:22, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hello Trisha, real life interfered while we were chatting about your draft; I'm sorry for that. Your draft's references (as of this version) are, in order:

1. http://www.highschoolfootballamerica.com, supposed to support the claim that Fisher hosts High School Football America/SoCal. It's a primary source, Fisher's own organization, and I don't see where it actually says so.
2. http://www.ocvarsity.com/articles/football-33757-team-league.html doesn't mention Fisher at all.
3. http://www.WFMZ.com looks malformed to me; the sentence that uses it as a reference seems to lack a few words. It doesn't mention Fisher anyway, and even if it dit it would still be a primary source: Fisher's former employer speaking about its employee.
4. Lehigh Men's Basketball record book, used for the Sixth Man Award. Doesn't devote as much as a single sentence to Fisher, and it looks like a primary source anyway: The organization giving the award reporting on its own award.
5. Feinstein's book. A reliable, independent source, but how much does it have to say about Fisher? Right now we cite it only for the claim that it mentions Fisher, which isn't all that helpful. Surely being mentioned in that book is not what's important about Fisher, is it?
6. and 7. A CNBC website and a CNBC video, used only for Fisher's appearance on CNBC. These have the same issues as the Feinstein book, except here it's pretty obvious that the sources don't cover Fisher in detail.

These are all the sources whose footnotes support the article proper. Then there's a list of footnotes for footnotes' sake:

8. Fisher's column at highschoolfootballamerica.com, a primary source just like no. 1.
9. and 10. Fisher's page at artistsfirst.com (and a broken link that looks as if it's related). "Brought to you by:" Jeff Fisher: A primary source.
11. The LA Times' newsblog. Devotes all of two lines to Fisher, but it's actually one of the better references because it's independent and provides some facts about him.
12. "Jeff Fisher debuts high school football show on Los Angeles airwaves", The Express-Times article about Fisher. Our best source by far: Independent, reliable, more detailed than any other (with the possible exception of Feinstein which I can't read right now). This source alone would allow us to write a short biography of Fisher. It details his education, his work for WFMZ-69 and KLAC AM 570 Fox Sports LA, "his High School Football America – SoCal" and so on. But right now we don't really make use of the source.

I'm not sure that last source is enough to establish Fisher's

reliable sources that are independent of the subject", where "significant coverage" is usually interpreted as "multiple sources of at least a paragraph each". But currently it's our best shot. Thus I'd suggest making the most use of it: Adding those details to the article proper and citing the newspaper article for the additions. Conversely, we should probably entirely remove all the primary sources and all the sources that don't mention Fisher, and we should try and cite Feinstein and CNBC for what they actually say about Fisher, not merely for the fact that they feature him. I hope this helps. Huon (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Articles for Creation
. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jeff Fisher, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

WP:REFUND/G13
. Thank you for your attention.
talk) 21:08, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello TrishaHoffman. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Jeff Fisher.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jeff Fisher}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.

talk) 01:01, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Your request for undeletion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. The thread is Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jeffrey Fisher. JohnCD (talk) 19:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quintin E. Primo III (October 10)

Articles for Creation
. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! TrishaHoffman, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quintin E. Primo III (October 11)

Articles for Creation
. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

reply

Hello, TrishaHoffman. You have new messages at MatthewVanitas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your recent edits

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts
. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quintin E. Primo III (January 26)

Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Please be specific. I need an example of what to do next. Please write it here. thanks TrishaHoffman (talk) 20:53, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]