User talk:Tropetroop29

Hi Tropetroop29! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like RhinosF1 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 23:30, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of animated television series of the 1960s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hunter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Warner Bros., you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Police Academy and Miss Congeniality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tropetroop29. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 02:29, 15 October 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hi Tropetroop29! You created a thread called IP Address at archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:01, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of television show franchises (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added links pointing to Sanford and Grady

List of animated television series of 1981 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Heathcliff

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to help with :List of highest grossing toy franchises Fanoflionking 12:29, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1990 in American television, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ABC and New Attitude (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Under the demographics section is where I got the information. Therefore if my edit was inaccurate then that section is 2. Plus the fact that the percentages add up to 70-80% doesn't show the total estimate of the population. Tropetroop29 (talk) 20:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:11, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dose you want to help create a Comdey series by episode count? Fanoflionking 13:36, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I'll do it. Tropetroop29 (talk) 16:00, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of situation comedies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sanford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1993 in American television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fallen Angels (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

It's only been a minute. Wait for it. Tropetroop29 (talk) 10:45, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bingobro were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TikTok dance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TikTok dance, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bingobro (Chat) 10:18, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I listed my sources and I can make a page on it. Tropetroop29 (talk) 08:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

]

Nomination of

The Fandom Menace

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fandom Menace until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 11:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Updating the page is completely fine. But to keep having it deleted even though credible sources are named is unnecessary. The same can be said from when comicsgate and gamergate has their pages. Especially when the topic was under the cultural impact of Star Wars which has became a giant topic in the fandom. Also the Star Wars Fandom page whom a person deleted the section of it. Want more sources, that's fine but to keep having people delete it with their own biases in mind is not acknowledging those parts of the fandom's topics. Tropetroop29 (talk) 11:48, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tropetroop29,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Arthistorian1977, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started,

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Arthistorian1977}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:15, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

The page was actually supposed to be titled #Graduation2020. But for some reason it wouldn't title it that way.

So I put Facebook&Instagram: #Graduation2020.It cut off.

Nice to meet you but this greeting is a bit off because instead of messaging me about it, you were up and ready to take it down.

So your approach is very bittersweet. Not sure if you wanted to come off, which is a first impression.

If this needs to be deleted it can. If anything #Graduation 2020 is what it's supposed to be called. Which is why sources aren't listed yet.

Anyway take care and remember I have the talk section on my page.

Tropetroop29 (talk) 12:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kristina Kuzmic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 07:58, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 16:45, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Add a source then. You can do that you know. Tropetroop29 (talk) 22:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1993 in American television, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ABC and Thea.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:51, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 22:25, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cool then let's delete Vlog Squad, Hype House and every other collective group on this site that has a page. Because they can be promoted just as hard.

You're completely biased. I never even said I promoted this group at all. You assumed that, says a lot about your character. Tropetroop29 (talk) 23:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

Ok Adam. I did have more references listed but it has been erased. Isnt any news source a good source for the topic or does it has to be a specific website? Tropetroop29 (talk) 01:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources need to be

independent or third-party, and they should discuss the subject beyond a mere trivial mention. Some news sources actually do not fit these requirements. There's actually a list of sources whose reliability has been repeatedly discussed, but it is not exhaustive. Adam9007 (talk) 01:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Tropetroop29! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello, Tropetroop29. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Tropetroop29. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:17, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of dragons in film and television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Histeria.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]