User talk:Truco/Archive 3
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
Hello Truco9311. I noticed that you blanked the nomination page you created for
- (In reply to your note on my talk16:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Aha! Now I understand what the problem was: Another user created a deletion discussion, but failed to tag the article, notify the article’s creator, or list the discussion in the AfD log. I have taken the liberty to clean up the mess. —talk17:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
You think its GA material? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
WWE Roster
Do you remember when you tried to re-create the WWE Roster page? If yes, did you save that stuff. Because the roster page does need a clean up. Maybe between the two of us, we can re-create the page in your sandbox, and then present it to
- I mean that maybe we should turn the roster into tables, instead of the format it's in right now. It would make it look more organized, and possibly more detailed. :] thew01:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well, we could create the article, and then present it. Many people disagreed with it last time before the page was created. If we create the page first, and then allow users to compare it, they might change their mind. And exactly, it is just humongous, and it should be shrunk down and more organized. thew01:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well i proposed a change at SiGn01:28, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- that makes sense. lets see what everyone else thinks. thew01:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- that makes sense. lets see what everyone else thinks.
- Well, we could create the article, and then present it. Many people disagreed with it last time before the page was created. If we create the page first, and then allow users to compare it, they might change their mind. And exactly, it is just humongous, and it should be shrunk down and more organized.
You warning is ignored...
...as
DX / The Kliq
Hey, if Raidcrissis continues to revert your edits for a fourth time, report him to
00:30, 17 January 2008 (UTC)- Well, just don't edit the article, for 24hrs and let someone else do the reverts. TJ just changed it, but if Raidcrisis continues to add his "opinion", then report him. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I had a similar "feud" with the guy; he kept adding HBK's win to participate in the Rumble, and I kept removing it, until I told him to read the hidden note. But, yeah, I'm here to back other members here. As for the alliance, I don't think LAX would mind if you join us in The Clan. ;) P.S. Don't forget to ask me a question for my interview. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Do it now. And yeah, ask LAX, he's part of the creation. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:12, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- You know what, ask Nikki. I'm pretty sure she'll take of it. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank god for Nikki. I know, TJ just explained that at the talk page. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:40, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- You are more than welcome to join. I think we'd make a great team when it comes to PPVs. Cheers, LAX 01:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- I was thinking the same thing. Cheers, LAX 01:51, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- What if we combine some part of our name. Like, TLT. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- I don't necessarily care what we change it to, I just want something creative. Cheers, LAX 01:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- What if we combine some part of our name. Like, TLT. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- I was thinking the same thing. Cheers, LAX 01:51, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- You are more than welcome to join. I think we'd make a great team when it comes to PPVs. Cheers, LAX 01:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank god for Nikki. I know, TJ just explained that at the talk page. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:40, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- You know what, ask Nikki. I'm pretty sure she'll take of it. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Do it now. And yeah, ask LAX, he's part of the creation. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:12, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. I had a similar "feud" with the guy; he kept adding HBK's win to participate in the Rumble, and I kept removing it, until I told him to read the hidden note. But, yeah, I'm here to back other members here. As for the alliance, I don't think LAX would mind if you join us in The Clan. ;) P.S. Don't forget to ask me a question for my interview. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Let's go with the Kliq. The name TLT United makes us sound like we created another brand of the army / navy. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- That's if your cool with it. If not, then I guess we should call ourselves TLT, since we are strong soldiers. So, are the three of us going to work on article anytime soon? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Isn't an IP expanding the Royal Rumble? As for No Way Out, I guess that would work. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Okay. When do we start? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'll help you with OTE '99. What do you want me to do? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- That's going to be hard. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- What about you, you wanna work on Survivor Series (2002) once we're all done with our respective PPVs? Cheers, LAX 22:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- That's going to be hard. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'll help you with OTE '99. What do you want me to do? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Okay. When do we start? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Isn't an IP expanding the Royal Rumble? As for No Way Out, I guess that would work. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
You going to add the box to your userpage? Cheers, LAX 00:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't bother to look at your page. Awesome, I still got like 6 months. Cheers, LAX 00:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
January 2008
Sorry for bothering you, but please stop reverting posts, before you break the 3RR rule, , please use the sandbox.
I started the post and you kept on reverting it, dont think your all cool.
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6d/Button_sig.png)
User:Vjmlhds
Don't worry about him. The next time he reverts, he'll brake the 3RR, and I'll report him. Cheers, LAX 23:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- He's already broken it, but I didn't give him the warning until after he broke it. Cheers, LAX 23:10, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Re: Unforgiven 2004
Thanks. That's exactly what I was going to do. Thanks for the comments. Hey, how does Unforgiven (2004) look? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Again, thanks. It looks very professional. You know, to make it more realistic, you should add some images to the article, to make it alive. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Just did. Thanks for the notice. Guess who's back? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- See here. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Its good. But you should probably add two more refs. to the results section (that's just me), but the article looks great. How 'bout Unforgiven (2006), is it good? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. Keep the good comments rolling. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Uh, I have, but really wouldn't consider to be one. Why? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmm. How 'bout you? Would you want to be one? Question: Would it be important to add that HBK injured his knee, while he participated in the Triple Threat match? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:15, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Uh, I have, but really wouldn't consider to be one. Why? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. Keep the good comments rolling. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Its good. But you should probably add two more refs. to the results section (that's just me), but the article looks great. How 'bout Unforgiven (2006), is it good? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- See here. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Just did. Thanks for the notice. Guess who's back? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Sure. Cheers, LAX 03:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Done, see here. Cheers, LAX 03:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome and I agree, but may I ask why you didn't upload it yourself? Cheers, LAX 03:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, ok. Yes, you must have an appropriate license tag. You must also include a full fair-use rationale and a source. Cheers, LAX 04:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Awesome, then all three of us can get started with Survivor Series. Cheers, LAX 04:14, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, ok. Yes, you must have an appropriate license tag. You must also include a full fair-use rationale and a source. Cheers, LAX 04:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome and I agree, but may I ask why you didn't upload it yourself? Cheers, LAX 03:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Does this work: After winning the World Heavyweight Championship at SummerSlam, Randy Orton was booked to defend the World Heavyweight title at Unforgiven against Triple H.? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- No not yet. I'll start on that probably this afternoon or something. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:17, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
hey there.
Do you think that "The Kliq" has room for a fourth member? Like I said to LAX, I could definitely learn a thing or two from you guys.
- Thanks so much! thew15:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Now, that I'm in the group maybe we can call it "iKliq". Of course it's up to you, LAX, and Blue. thew16:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Now, that I'm in the group maybe we can call it "iKliq". Of course it's up to you, LAX, and Blue.
Ohh, ok. If you want to use our usernames, we can to TiLT. lol. Otherwise, we can leave "The Kliq"
- Gotta agree with you on that one. thew16:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Gotta agree with you on that one.
WWE ROSTER corporate etc
Correct me if I'm wrong, Truco, but you said, and I quote, "you all can revert if you don't agree with me removing the talent relations from the WWE Roster and TNA Roster." And since when is the decision of 3 people the way to make decisions around here? Wikipedia is not run by three people, it's run by all the people. In the past, especially on the WWE Roster page, we've attempted to do some democratic voting, and I don't think it is unreasonable to do it again for this situation. Especially considering some of the people you insist on deleting are occasional on-air talents. Dahumorist (talk) 18:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with you. I just think the subject should be brought to discussion BEFORE it is deleted. I simply suggest moving the current discussion to the WWE Roster page so that the people who actually edit the page on a regular basis may have a say in it. The democratic way works, but people don't always assume to go to a completely different page to discuss topics about a specific page. There is a reason EACH article on wikipedia has a discussion tab. If it is not utilized, you can't expect people to vote either way. Dahumorist (talk) 18:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'm glad we could discuss this civilly. Dahumorist (talk) 19:06, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
WWE Raw
I would like to ask you, why did you revert my post/edit? It correctly said in the reference site, "WWE built new sets for RAW and SmackDown for their HD debuts."
Alright, then it is.NiMiTiZe Msg23:04, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
RE: Admin
Besides revert vandalism, to tell you the truth I don't really edit anything else. As for your sandbox, is it ok if I get to that later? I just don't feel like doing that right now (unless you really want me to). Cheers, LAX 03:00, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll do it tomorrow. Yes, I think you'd make a good admin if you edited articles under those areas more often. Cheers, LAX 03:07, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
No Way Out (2004)
![]() |
The Professional Wrestling Barnstar | |
For all of your hard work on thew 15:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
|
- no problem. btw, i'll be gone until about 2 or 3 o'clock (in new york), when i come back, i'll work some more on thew15:41, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- nevermind. i'm here. ;} thew17:43, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- nevermind. i'm here. ;}
Check it Out
Click the link on, "The Kliq"'s userbox, check out the new section I just finished.
- just today. he sorta requested it on Blue's talk page, he let him join. But Blue and I think that after D.M.N., nobody else should join. thew20:00, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- ha yeah. just picture, WP:The Kliq. lol. we should put it in our browse bar. thew20:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- ha yeah. just picture, WP:The Kliq. lol. we should put it in our browse bar.
- i was playing around with my nav bar, and i got it onto my navigation bar. i couldn't find any pictures, so i used the Wikipedia logo. thew20:21, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- i was playing around with my nav bar, and i got it onto my navigation bar. i couldn't find any pictures, so i used the Wikipedia logo.
Blue and I think that
- hey, you awake yet? thew15:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, no. I hate football. I see no point to it. (But that's just me) Why do you ask? thew15:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, no. I hate football. I see no point to it. (But that's just me) Why do you ask?
- ok. so are you ready to start SS? thew15:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- ok. so are you ready to start SS?
- oops sorry! i thought you we're doing homework, so Blue suggested I work on the event section. Would you like to finish it up? I'll work on something else thew17:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- oops sorry! i thought you we're doing homework, so Blue suggested I work on the event section. Would you like to finish it up? I'll work on something else
- ok, so you want me to do the rest of the results? Btw, how do the first three matches look. thew17:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- ok, so you want me to do the rest of the results? Btw, how do the first three matches look.
- no problem, thanks for the advice. thew18:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- no problem, thanks for the advice.
- For now, yeah. I just need you, Blue, LAX, and D.M.N. to look it over. Make as many changes as necessary. thew18:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- For now, yeah. I just need you, Blue, LAX, and D.M.N. to look it over. Make as many changes as necessary.
Go vote for our next project on the kliq's page. Btw, the discussion is on Blue and LAX's talk pages.
- done. thew21:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
The Kliq
Check
- I will... in three hours. I have somewhere to go in real-life. Chronic00:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Okay: go to Chronic21:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Just put it at the bottom of the browse bar page, and make any further changes from there. Chronic22:05, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Just put it at the bottom of the browse bar page, and make any further changes from there.
- Okay: go to
Done with the task.
- BTW, when was the last time you updated your Chronic07:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- BTW, when was the last time you updated your
Why are you deleting my constructive topic?
I'm trying to discuss the inaccuracy of a entire paragraph in the SvR2008 talk page, but you are repeatedly deleting it. What is your justification for deletion? I am disputing a claim that is made DIRECTLY IN THE ARTICLE, I am NOT using the talk page as a forum, so why are you accusing me of vandalism? I hate vandalism as much as you do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.236.41.140 (talk) 02:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Edit: Thanks for your time, we all make mistakes XD you're a good guy. Rock on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.236.41.140 (talk) 02:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Title
Nice title you got there. Where'd you steal get it from? Cheers, LAX 22:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- True that. lol. Cheers, LAX 23:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Kinda rough at the moment, but I think we'll be better in a couple days. Cheers, LAX 23:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, lol. Cheers, LAX 23:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe if none of the other WP:PW members want to. Cheers, LAX 23:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Caucasian. Why? Cheers, LAX 23:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, I'm "white", too. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- I know. But the name "ThinkBlue" comes from the 23:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- They don't? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't know. Especially that I'd lived there for 14½ years. But whatever. What article do you want to work on? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oops, sorry. I'd lived there. Anyways, I think we should edit PPV's that are current, you know what I mean? Yeah, I know. But we still need the Lesnar / Big Show feud, in which LAX is working on and some info. about the aftermath and basically we will be done. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Like for your talk page? If so, go 00:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oops, sorry. I'd lived there. Anyways, I think we should edit PPV's that are current, you know what I mean? Yeah, I know. But we still need the Lesnar / Big Show feud, in which LAX is working on and some info. about the aftermath and basically we will be done. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't know. Especially that I'd lived there for 14½ years. But whatever. What article do you want to work on? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- They don't? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- I know. But the name "ThinkBlue" comes from the 23:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe if none of the other WP:PW members want to. Cheers, LAX 23:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, lol. Cheers, LAX 23:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Kinda rough at the moment, but I think we'll be better in a couple days. Cheers, LAX 23:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Hmmm, you know you might as well ask Chronic, cause I've been reading it and it is confusing and Chronic knows this kind of stuff. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Matt wants to "quit" the Kliq. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:21, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, he says he doesn't want to quit, but in his words (before), guess, the only thing is, I'm not sure but I might take a short wikibreak. I dunno, it just seems like I'm on the outs of our group. Ask Hybrid, he knows some info. on the archiving stuff. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- I guess. What's your opinion if we "collaborate" on a PPV, the same way we do for the Collaboration of the week? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, he says he doesn't want to quit, but in his words (before), guess, the only thing is, I'm not sure but I might take a short wikibreak. I dunno, it just seems like I'm on the outs of our group. Ask Hybrid, he knows some info. on the archiving stuff. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6d/Button_sig.png)