User talk:Tupsumato
Barnstars etc.
The Hard Worker's Barnstar | |
For your consistantly high level contributions in the topic area of ships and ship design. Keep it up and happy editing! Sadads (talk) 19:11, 28 April 2011 (UTC) |
The Minor Barnstar | ||
For cleaning up my (many) little mistakes and producing small edits of absolute top quality on the Titanic II article, and associated articles. MatthewHaywood (talk) 19:00, 24 August 2012 (UTC) |
The Citation Barnstar | ||
For your diligent efforts on wp:ships, attention to detail, and knowing that citation that I could not find. Martin451 (talk) 23:58, 21 February 2013 (UTC) |
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
I just wanted to thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Ships#Proposal to rename article ARA Suboficial Castillo (A-6) to USS Takelma (ATF-113). I appreciate your input. KNHaw (talk) 17:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC) |
Great article creation in Kigoriak! Keep it up! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 08:40, 29 November 2018 (UTC) |
DYKs
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page . |
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page . |
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page . |
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page . |
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page . |
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page . |
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page . |
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page . |
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page . |
company's head office in Finland, was a "Motorola spy ship"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Finnish transport vessel Wilhelm Carpelan. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page . |
On 15 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Moskva (1959 icebreaker), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Soviet icebreaker Moskva once helped to free a herd of beluga whales trapped by pack ice? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Moskva (1959 icebreaker). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Discussions
Projects 97 and 97AP icebreakers
- Project 97:
На первых трёх ледоколах проекта 97, строившихся по заказу ВМФ, устанавливалось артиллерийское вооружение — одна 57-мм двухорудийная артиллерийская установка ЗИФ-31-Б и одна 25-мм двухорудийная установка 2М-3М. Впоследствии данное вооружение было демонтировано.
— [1] - Project 97AP:
Первоначально на патрульных ледоколах устанавливалось артиллерийское вооружение — одна 57-мм двухорудийная артиллерийская установка ЗИФ-31-Б и одна 25-мм двухорудийная установка 2М-3М. Впоследствии вооружение с ледоколов было демонтировано.
— [2]
--212.32.207.152 (talk) 20:00, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Tupsumato, извините, я не говорю по-английски. Возможно следующая Ваша правка верная [3], но наверное нам следует поискать ещё какие-либо источники, подтверждающие, что Vladimir Kavrayskiy был 2-винтовым судном. Например, отец и сын Музалевские (2010) также пишут, что Vladimir Kavrayskiy был 3-винтовым судном: [4], [5]. Возможно они ошибаются, нужна проверка по другим источникам. --109.169.214.220 (talk) 20:30, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- No problem. I will continue looking for information. Tupsumato (talk) 14:04, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
- ISBN 5-85875-110-5, retrieved 2023-01-10]
- Nikita Kuznetsov (2009), "От «Добрыни Никитича» до «Отто Шмидта»: Ледоколы проекта 97 и их модификации", Морская коллекция (in Russian), no. 8 (119), Moscow: Моделист-конструктор, p. 22, retrieved 2023-01-10
- Mikhail Muzalevsky; Pavel Muzalevsky (2010), A. L. Demin (ed.), Покорители льдов: Корабли, капитаны, судьбы (in Russian), vol. 2, Moscow: Кавалеръ, p. 45, retrieved 2023-01-10
Ни в одном из этих источников не пишется, что «Владимир Каврайский» (Vladimir Kavrayskiy) был 2-винтовым судном. Кроме того, в третьем источнике (Muzalevsky 2010) прямо указывается, что он имел 3 винта. --80.234.72.242 (talk) 18:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your effort. While one of my Russian contacts speculated that Muzalevsky may have a misprint, none of the sources clearly state that Vladimir Kavrayskiy would not have a bow propeller. Thus, I have removed the previous claim from the article. Tupsumato (talk) 06:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, в свою очередь я тоже спрашивал у коллеги Alex omen, создателя статьи Владимир Каврайский (судно) в русскоязычной Википедии, попадалась ли ему информация в других источниках (кроме сайта RussianShips.info) о том, что «Владимир Каврайский» был 2-винтовым. Он ответил, что согласно всем известным ему источникам, гидрографическое судно «Владимир Каврайский» имело 3 винта. --212.32.192.17 (talk) 09:00, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- ISBN 978-5-7444-4232-3, retrieved 2023-01-18. Кстати, такую же номинальную мощность кормовых гребных электродвигателей постоянного тока на научно-исследовательском ледоколе «Отто Шмидт» проекта 97Н указывает и Н. А. Кузнецов (4800 л. с. = 2 × 2400 л. с.):]
--212.32.207.162 (talk) 23:30, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Мощность гребных электродвигателей, л. с.: 4800
— Kuznetsov 2009, p. 29.
- Thank you again for confirming these details from Russian sources — I'll revise the article at some point when time allows. In the meanwhile, feel free to correct any details that are incorrect or missing in the article. Tupsumato (talk) 06:45, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- Tupsumato, благодарю за Вашу работу! Однако я опасаюсь вносить правки в статьи англоязычной Википедии из-за грамматических ошибок, так как к сожалению не владею английским языком. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ --95.67.131.254 (talk) 10:40, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you again for confirming these details from Russian sources — I'll revise the article at some point when time allows. In the meanwhile, feel free to correct any details that are incorrect or missing in the article. Tupsumato (talk) 06:45, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your effort. While one of my Russian contacts speculated that Muzalevsky may have a misprint, none of the sources clearly state that Vladimir Kavrayskiy would not have a bow propeller. Thus, I have removed the previous claim from the article. Tupsumato (talk) 06:55, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- ISBN 0-87021-240-0, retrieved 2023-02-02.Однако боюсь, что Норман Полмар может ошибаться, поскольку там вначале у него уже присутствует вероятная ошибка — он пишет, что «Владимир Каврайский» был введён в строй в 1973 году ("Completed 1973"). В то время, как практически все российские источники утверждают, что «Владимир Каврайский» был введён в строй 31 декабря 1969 года, в том числе и официальный сайт разработчика судна — [6]. --80.234.77.251 (talk) 12:45, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Question
Hello Tupsumato. Can you take a look at the question I posed here? I suspect that a value for depth has been mistaken for draught/draft. Many thanks,
Reverted edition
Sorry I reverted your edition on Magadan (icebreaker); I was trying to reverse a previous one and it looks like the bot and you had already done the job. I see that you readded what I mistakenly reverted, so everything is fine now. Gorpik (talk) 09:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
Minor edit flag
Hi Tupsumato! I noticed that you are marking edits as minor that are not minor.
- Thank you for reminding me. I admit I have used it incorrectly and will try to fix my bad habits in the future. Tupsumato (talk) 17:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Dali
Thanks for a nice set of edits. The only one that bothers me just a little is the question of the Maersk charter. Although I think that it is likely that Dali has been chartered continuously, I haven't found a reference for that - only that the ship started with Maersk, and is currently (hence my slightly clunky text). Can you find anything? - Davidships (talk) 03:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'll try to find "positive evidence" of continuous Maersk charter. A quick search brought up mentions of Maersk chartering Dali in 2015, 2016, 2018 and 2020. Sea-web does not mention other companies associated with the ship either. Tupsumato (talk) 04:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks again MrT. After I retired, I hung on to my former employer's SeaWeb access for a while until they didn't renew (as they got free access to Clarksons database, which was fine from their point of view). Lloyd’s List Containers ex-Containerisation International might have something - Davidships (talk) 13:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Imperial or metric horsepowers?
{{convert|5500|PS|hp kW|abbr=on}}
→ 5,500 PS (5,400 hp; 4,000 kW).{{convert|22000|PS|hp kW|abbr=on|-2}}
→ 22,000 PS (21,700 hp; 16,200 kW).С уважением. --176.15.211.253 (talk) 19:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have to admit I never thought of this but it makes sense and explains few minor discrepancies that I have encountered while writing and editing articles. Спасибо! It seems that I have a lot of reference-checking and minor editing work ahead of me... Tupsumato (talk) 20:10, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Since this issue is relevant for everyone writing about ships, I have brought it up on WikiProject Ships talk page. Tupsumato (talk) 20:51, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks! К сожалению это довольно распространённая ошибка… например, в англоязычной версии сайта Russianships.info данная ошибка тоже присутствует. С уважением. --176.15.211.253 (talk) 21:55, 26 May 2024 (UTC)