User talk:Turgeis

Hello, Turgeis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to

]

Turgeis, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Turgeis! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) talk) 01:17, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply ]

Welcome to MILHIST

Hello and welcome to the

Military history WikiProject

! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
• Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several
  detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics
  .
• We have a number of
  task forces
  that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 09:13, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Turgeis. I've reverted your recent edits at Peninsular War because they consist, at least in part, of huge chunks of text copy pasted from Charles Esdailes' The Peninsular War: A New History.

Although you have credited the source, apart from the actual legal aspects involved, such wholesale pasting clearly goes against the spirit of how to use copyrighted text and its purpose, which is to use brief quotations to illustrate a specific point, not to give a wide-ranging account of events. Another problem here is that both the tone and scope used in a book ("Nor does much interest attach to such military events...") is very different from that used in an encyclopaedia.

This matter has already been raised recently at the corresponding talk page where you can find an interesting link on this topic.

Please go through your edits to the article and re-write them or simply remove them to make sure that the article conforms to both the spirit and the legal issues involved. If you have any doubts about what to include, the best place to raise them is at the article talk page, where other editors who follow the development of the article can give you advice. Regards, --Technopat (talk) 08:59, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I will rewrite these parts. Turgeis (talk) 16:53, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) --Technopat (talk) 17:35, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Greco-Italian War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added links pointing to Italian, Barbarossa, Ciano and Debacle

Peninsular War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cabinet

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of Baden-Württemberg may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Thus, on December 6, 1951, under [[Federal law]], a referendum was held in four voting districts ([[North Baden]], [[South Baden]], [[North Württemberg]] and [[South Württemberg-Hohenzollern]]

Thanks,

Hello, it's not that I'm so opposed to King having its own article it's more that a consensus view was reached in the past so one should at least bring it up for discussion again before changing it. It's how things are generally done on Wikipedia. I see that there was a longer discussion at Monarch as well. Due diligence is to figure out if the circumstances are significantly different now or if it's just your position that is contrary to the earlier consensus view. My advice is to give it a least a couple of weeks to see if anyone responds. If I have the energy to look into then I will do so and see how the situation now compares to the situation then.

It's also worth noting that the Monarch article is in OK shape. The King article you wrote was pretty thin and lacked any citations. If you are going to create an article for King it should be at least as good as the one at Monarch. SQGibbon (talk) 02:50, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the
  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Feudal monarchy and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Feudal monarchy, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission
  for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the
  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Feudal monarchy
  with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the
  GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Feudal monarchy. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials
  for instructions.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Feudal monarchy saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

English food riots (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added links pointing to Ashton, Charles Wilson and Wearmouth

Feudal monarchy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added a link pointing to Labour

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

History of Poland in the Early Modern era (1569–1795) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added links pointing to

Nobles' Democracy

Noble republic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver

)

added links pointing to Friedberg and Burg

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:35, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at

Please note that this block has been performed as a consequence of the report raised here. A cursory review of the contributions of User:Creakness, User:Turgeis and User:Ceiscoran indicates strongly that all three are accounts are controlled by the same person. As multiple insertions of content copyrighted to third parties have taken place, all three accounts are hereby blocked based on the precautionary principle.

An unblock request should address the following:

• An understanding of our
  copyright policies
• An understanding of
  our policies related to reliable sourcing
  , in particular how and why video games are rarely a good source of information for our articles.

Thank you. MLauba ^(Talk) 16:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 18:20, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merchant republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 20:44, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]