User talk:Uktvhistory064
Speedy deletion of "NGO TV"
A page you created, NGO TV, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:
- No indication of importance/significance. An article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.
Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our
If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you Prashanthns (talk) 20:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of NGO TV
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rosiestep (talk) 21:09, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Treasure Trooper
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 21:54, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of NGO TV
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 22:37, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Ripwave
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
speedy deletion...
I saw you recently had several articles you started nominated for speedy deletion, and that the justification offered was "insufficient context". One of the nominators recently nominated an article I recently started for speedy deletion for the same reason.
We are all volunteers here. I was very unhappy with the way this particular volunteer performed their volunteer quality control inspections.
In the case of the article I started they applied an obviously inappropriate tag.
They applied the speedy deletion tag just one minute after it was created -- which does not comply with the wikipedia's deletion policies.
And they proved unwilling to consider the possibility they may have made a mistake.
Since then I have seen from their User pages that they are a teenager (born in the 1990s the page says...). I don't have a problem with that. I don't have a problem with interacting with a teenager, even a very young teenager, as an equal -- provided they are willing to assume adult responsibilities.
Anyhow, if you want to ask the deleting administrator(s) to get articles you started "userified", drop me a line, and I will take a look at them, and let you know if there are hints I can offer that would help them survive a Wikipedia: deletion review.
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 20:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Polish Radio London
AfD nomination of Polish Radio London
Speedy deletion of NGO TV
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ~~ [Jam][talk] 12:45, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Notability of Joe Drumgoole
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria
Notability and References
Hi. I see that a lot of articles you have input are being nominated for deletion. It would be worth your while to read the guideline on
]RTE Radio 1 Extra and RTE Europe move...
I haven't heard that one channel replaced the other. Have you got any sources that confirm this? howth575 (talk) 14:47, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article WRC on Dave has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article containing no information beyond what a TV Guide would give, there is little notability about the Rally highlights coverage on Dave anyway.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
Wikiproject British TV channels
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a7/Union_flag_tv.svg/100px-Union_flag_tv.svg.png)
This is a message from Wikiproject British TV channels. Please visit the main project page to reconfirm if you are actively taking part in the project and update your details. Many thanks. Auntie Beeb (talk) 00:26, 15 May 2011 (UTC)