User talk:Uniquepw

The reason why this is relevant to the change, is I reasoned from viewing the photographs ("man in Klangkarussel Netzwerk video" is a recreation of a search link, because the link route to the photographs on my computer is closed).

Having once before viewed the photographs and others and seen that people have died falling, and Mustang Wanted is still living, and thought because

(not to state that it was Petit's intention to cause the fear in others, seeing that "celebration of Picasso's birthday" (c.f. these images of painting by Picasso) - indicates his situation as a bohemian in a bourgeoisie world)

(c.f. "common assault definition to cause fear in others") were caused to feel a type of fear because if they stopped working to look then they would have feared (perhaps) having to see him fall, which would have introduced to the thought of the workers thoughts of death (that is the mental aspect of the emotion fear)

(ii) this particular image indicated to me, elements not very dissimilar to the world trade centre attack photographs (for example (this being the first time I've viewed this particular image), being a plane + something which causes a type of fear (perhaps) + the world trade centre (actually their a number of centres around the world), there is no other obvious image I know of, of a photograph with these elements (perhaps their is, of a suicide from the centre, prior to the Petit image)

i am uniquepw (talk) 19:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

read: book by Alexander Waugh (2013 Bloomsbury)

copy (seemed significant at the time), dashes ("-" indicates read from preceeding to proceeding (before to after), dots ("...") indicates didn't read

scintillating

at 116 "..mask of cheerfulness.."

I was incredulous because Waugh must have fabricated the detail (surely) to state this

117 - "...he explained to her in touching tones.."

doesn't seem very possible to know of

Uniquepw (talk) 02:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ps 1 change made after tilde

pps 'The Golden Age of Security' is "Stefan Zweig" Uniquepw (talk) 02:26, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(115) "Arriving in Switzerland - a Picasso that she was tempted to purchase ... I die the thousand unnecessary deaths that every coward dies ... Like Ludwig - rails of Tolstovian Christianity ... son Tommy ... (116) Paul's Altered Character The mask of cheerfulness with which Paul had greeted his family ... Memories of his father, of his suicidal brothers Hans and Rudi, guilt at having (117) deserted his comrades at Krepost...Ludwig's unstable mind...frustrations of every kind - sat by her bedside...Rosalie's dying - stoicism...When she died - addressed to Mrs Wittgenstein ... After her death Paul's agitation and irritability increased - Hermine and Mrs Wittgenstein - frequency of his 'crazy moods' - was both apologetic...He explained to her in touching tones how much he was suffering from his own irritability ... (120) interested in the stump - music ... The death on 21 November 1916 of Emperor - 'The Golden Age of Security'... (121) The Wittgensteins - (lower class - literally 'not born')... Alleegasse and Neuwaldegg ...'loosen her ties to Papa'...At court the Emperor - Austrian arms ... (122) Lenin's envoy Leon Trotsky - at Brest-Litovsk ...Oblivious to the threat of execution - August 1917 ... (124) ...Paul's illness (a violent influenza)...Schiele's - died on the 28th ... Corporal Adolf Hitler - you out to accomplish something ... (127) ...A special poignancy marks - it became too much for him and he killed himself ... In the confusion of these days their would have been no inquiries...- This version however conflicts with that of Gretl's son - because he refused to be taken prisoner by the Italians... Johanna, following her interviews with family members - 1980s...(128) refused to obey - dispatching himself in a sudden burst of fury...

Uniquepw (talk) 02:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

signature at copy to userpage i am uniquepw (talk) 19:27, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ludwig Wittgenstein. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Errantius (talk) 10:44, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly I'll be refraining from such fripperies in the future, thanks for your guiding hand to my behaviour here i am uniquepw (talk) 18:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:23, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Berners-Lee writings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berners-Lee writings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PamD 06:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tolstoy writings. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 5#Tolstoy writings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. PamD 07:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of works by individuals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of works by individuals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from moving articles in this area without consensus and discussion on the talk page. Also please read up on

You know, if you're going to sock you should probably consider not being disruptive and moving high traffic/high profile articles. If you would save us all the trouble and revert your redundant and mostly incoherent additions to this article it would be greatly appreciated. CUPIDICAE💕 17:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you're stating "sock"....? Yes I admit I made a mistake at

Vaginal diseases, by attempting to develop that article as female reproductive system disease when Female genital disease exists, that situation of error I'm attributing to lack of sleep, usually I sleep enough to not make those types of errors. I really don't won't to be a problem, but I can't see how the article presents information in a non-acceptable way I'm sure my writing isn't incoherent (perhaps you'd like to disprove my opinion, then I would appreciate how I'm wrong), at least in the sense of "incomprehensible", I re-read what I write to determine if sentences are syntactically possible - ( I don't drink alcohol at all, so that couldn't be a possible either), as to "confusing .. unclear", that is possible I suppose, but the fact of the second criticism being possible doesn't indicate I'm the cause, perhaps you found the writing confusing, but it isn't to other people reading ....? As you know you're free to rewrite ... while maintaining the valid factual inclusion ... I definetly won't need to move the current article - except for the inclusion of urinary or pelvic disease as possible, which obviously we would have to discuss prior to any decision Uniquepw (talk) 22:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

You are aware of what sock puppetry is, so perhaps get ahead of this by ceasing edits before you get blocked on this account too. You're refusing to discuss and are just editing as you please despite objections. CUPIDICAE💕 23:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"...we would have to discuss prior to any decision Uniquepw (talk) 22:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)..." ? With regards to your perception of me doing something wrong ... whatever the accusation is, improvement of articles takes a precedence wouldn't you agree? I'm not here to fail or problematacize mine, other editors or readers lives - if the source is reliable, then how are you perceiving something which is contentious that discussion would be necessary over and above improving the encyclopedia ? As to the "sock puppetry", really your sense of reality is askew, what could be the reason you think I would be some other editor? Uniquepw (talk) 23:44, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I note that this user is blocked, but I'm recording here that I would otherwise have sought advice at