User talk:Vanquisher.UA/archives/2013

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of zombie short films and undead-related projects, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Porter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:37, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Disambiguation link notification for June 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Keith Wayne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First United Methodist Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Thermoelectric effect may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks,

]

Just because you can doesn't mean you should

In edits like this one, you are making the assumption that

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania will also be the primarytopic for Pittsburgh. Perhaps it's a good bet in this case, but how does such an edit improve anything? If we someday made Pittsburgh go to a disambig page, which is the alternate way to deal with its ambiguity, all your edits would become mistakes that need to be corrected. Why not leave the unambiguous linkage alone? Who put you up to this busywork? Dicklyon (talk) 23:52, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

I am removing your AWB access for mass edits like this that are controversial, and for lots of minor "fixes" that do not change the appearance of the article at all. --Rschen7754 00:04, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, it's was only test of functionality. No any other reasons. Vanquisher (talk) 00:07, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There's little point in Dicklyon guessing what a page title might be at some hypothetical future point. A page title is just as likely to change to some other thing (e.g. Pittsburgh, PA). No
crystal balls required.--Jeffro77 (talk) 01:16, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
(I should also add that I agree that tools for batch edits should probably be used more conservatively.)--Jeffro77 (talk) 01:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Further to the above, please stop making white space only changes to articles. Removing white space at the end of lines (e.g. as done here) does not affect the output HTML, making them nearly entirely useless edits which shouldn't really be performed on their own, especially not if you're using a script to assist you with them. - Kingpin13 (talk) 11:15, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Stopped Vanquisher (talk) 11:19, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


italics for Maxie

Vanquisher, we use italics for book and periodical titles. Chapter or article titles in these works get "quote marks". See:

]

Apology

In my edit[1] I accidentally removed the comment you'd just added. Had I realised I would have immediately self-reverted. My PC/connection has a problem with large uploads - after a couple of minutes waiting for the grey circle thing to stop spinning (in Firefox) I pressed F5 and then "Save" again not realising that it would undo any changes made in the meantime (I'm surprised it didn't get flagged as an edit conflict). I'll check my diff if this occurs in the future. I can't edit that discussion at all now so can you replace your comment. DexDor (talk) 05:07, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

  • (diff | hist) . . Louis Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma‎; 19:31 . . (-47)‎ . . ‎Vanquisher.UA (Talk | contribs)‎ (removed Category:Recipients of the Legion of Merit using HotCat)
  • (diff | hist) . . Phillip Bennett‎; 19:24 . . (0)‎ . . ‎Vanquisher.UA (Talk | contribs)‎ (fix)
  • (diff | hist) . . David Shackleton (admiral)‎; 19:19 . . (0)‎ . . ‎Vanquisher.UA (Talk | contribs)‎ (fix)
  • (diff | hist) . . John Baker (general)‎; 19:17 . . (-47)‎ . . ‎Vanquisher.UA (Talk | contribs)‎ (removed Category:Recipients of the Legion of Merit using HotCat)
  • (diff | hist) . . William Slim, 1st Viscount Slim‎; 19:17 . . (-47)‎ . . ‎Vanquisher.UA (Talk | contribs)‎ (removed Category:Recipients of the Legion of Merit using HotCat)
  • (diff | hist) . . Peter Cosgrove‎; 19:10 . . (-47)‎ . . ‎Vanquisher.UA (Talk | contribs)‎ (removed Category:Recipients of the Legion of Merit using HotCat)
  • (diff | hist) . . Ash Power‎; 19:03 . . (-47)‎ . . ‎Vanquisher.UA (Talk | contribs)‎ (removed Category:Recipients of the Legion of Merit using HotCat)
  • (diff | hist) . . Vladimir Masorin‎; 19:03 . . (-47)‎ . . ‎Vanquisher.UA (Talk | contribs)‎ (removed Category:Recipients of the Legion of Merit using HotCat)
  • (diff | hist) . . Gus Gilmore‎; 19:02 . . (-47)‎ . . ‎Vanquisher.UA (Talk | contribs)‎ (removed Category:Recipients of the Legion of Merit using HotCat)

Pdfpdf (talk) 12:15, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That are the fixes of my previous incorrect edits due to wrong request on google.com. As you can see all edits after that are strongly right and true. Vanquisher.UA(talk) 14:55, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ha. I see. (I didn't notice the other edits.) Thanks for the explanation. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 03:03, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AWB

Hi, I have put a request on

WP:AN to see if someone will consider granting you AWB. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:29, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

October 2013

Hello, I'm

Night of the Day of the Dawn may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page
.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • //voices.yahoo.com/jim-riffel-99-movie-challenged-7983544.html?cat=40 |accessdate=2 October 2013]}}</ref>
  • Kevin-Smith-Offered-Ten-Grand-Review-Jersey-Filmmaker-Movie-27574.html |accessdate=2 October 2013]}}</ref>

Thanks,

]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of zombie short films and undead-related projects may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks,

]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of zombie short films and undead-related projects may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Cinema of Italy, Spain and France, 1960-1980 |publisher=[[McFarland & Company|McFarland]]] |pages=338 |oclc=6901027531 |isbn=0786448881 |url=http://books.google.com.ua/books?id=qVutMarqq44C

Thanks,

]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of zombie short films and undead-related projects may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • web |first=Aidan |last=McClave |date=1 November 2012 |title=''2 Hours'' (Michael Ballif, 2012): USA) |type=Review |publisher=''SBCC Film Reviews'' |url=http://sbccfilmreviews.org/?p=22514 |accessdate=

Thanks,

]

Hello, I'm

List of zombie other films may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page
.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {|class="wikitable sortable"
  • |url=http://www.nightmare-horrormovies.de/thread.php?threadid=319 |accessdate=2 October 2013}}{{de{{de icon}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=frank-castle |title=Zombie — The Resurrection (

Thanks,

]

Hello Im Library777. I have been trying ALL DAY to edit List of Zombie Films. It says these films are good budgeted or popular. I paid to rent films from this list, some were not even "Zombie films", some were close to rank Porn, low budget and not popular. I first tried to revise the heading that says they are high budget and popular and that was undone. I tried to add a note that there were sex explicit and lowbudget films and that was undone. I then, as others have and its been accepted, tried to put in the proper box "sex explicit" and for description "low budget", "sheep zombies" and that was undone. I was told to "talk about it or to delete the movies not conforming". I deleted two movies not conforming because they were neither popular or good budgeted and they undid this. now I am upset and I intend to report this as malicious editing. I used to contribute to Wikipedia a lot and now I feel like the only ones who can contribute are a bunch of editing bullies. I wont quit. I will make it difficult on all of you as much as you make it on me. I am the only American woman that survived 2 years in Iran. So bad people trying to give me a hard time really are opening up Pandoras box. I have a right to contribute without being needle picked for an entire day. This is disgusting.Library777 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Library777 (talkcontribs) 21:08, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


  • Greetings! I'm sure you're well familiar with
    WP:3RR, but just a courtesy reminder that I see three reverts you've made at List of zombie films‎ within the last 24 hours. Since there's an open AN/I report involving that page and User:Library777, I'd suggest you be very careful that you don't hit four reverts. —C.Fred (talk) 21:34, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]

I appreciate the ardor of your arguments and your willingness to engage in discourse. No matter the topic, our ultimate goal here is to serve to expand a reader's understanding of a topic. At several of your other AFDs I have found myself in complete agreement. Best wishes, and be well. Schmidt, Michael Q. 18:41, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zombies

I reverted because your rational "she didnt want porn listed"

verify the claims. If you want to alter content based on policy, that is fine, but you cannot alter it in ways that are counter to policy. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:07, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

With regard to this edit, please note that per

]