User talk:Vatsun

A tag has been placed on

.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Woodym555 22:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Vatsun, and

. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Please review the links above. You seem to be working quickly through several small contents and are attempting to improve Wikipedia. I suggest you slow down, flesh out your articles and attempt to give them more context to avoid deletion of your work. Best of luck to you! Douglasmtaylor 22:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May i be another person to welcome you to wikipedia. I nominated the article for deletion because it had no context or links of any kind. After seeing douglastaylors commments i see that you were trying to create smaller articles. I apologise if i offended you in anyway but the artilce has to be fleshed out to avoid being flagged for deletion. Again, i did not wish to disparage your edits, more a request for more information added to them. Happy editing! Woodym555 23:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution,

has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Dina Nath Nadim and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the
  GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Dina Nath Nadim
  with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the
  GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Dina Nath Nadim
  .

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. The Evil Spartan 20:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of the attempts by Vatsun to flesh out the number of Idaho articles, for certain reasons. Would it be possible to incorporate the various articles under debate into connected, larger articles? (For example, "Scott Moscrip", "Roady's Truck Stops", and "Internet Truckstop" into the article "New Plymouth, ID". Or "Francois Payette" into "Payette County".) It might be easier to do that rather than delete the material. Also, I have citations for all of the material written about, so I can add that to the intregrated pages, thus proving that the material is not hogwash. Luminece 16:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedian! I just wanted to let you know that WikiProject Green Bay Packers is looking for participants who are interested in improving the quality of the articles on America's favorite small-town team, the Green Bay Packers! If you want to help, you can your name to our list of participants, check out our to-do list, and most importantly, improve the articles!

]

WikiProject Idaho

I saw your name at participants. At set out at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Idaho#Images, I revised the way WikiProject Idaho may monitor Idaho articles needing photos. Best. GregManninLB (talk) 03:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, that was rather abrupt! You eliminated the article "Cataldo Mission" by merger of its material into your new article "Old Mission State Park".

I appreciate that you have new material, new information and photos, and probably only one article is necessary, hence a merger makes sense. However, it is more usual to post a proposal for a merger being needed, and allow discussion, such as which article should be merged. Perhaps you do not know that you can do that by "mergeto" and "mergefrom" tags. For example this mergefrom is an edit I recently made, that corresponded to a matching mergeto in the article i identified as a duplicate under another name.

In my experience in wikipedia, it has usually been agreed to merge the newer article into the older one, so as not to wipe out the older edit history, but you went the other way already. I don't care about edit history so very much, but I note your change has the effect of showing you as the page creator, when it could be argued that it was only your mistake not to find the pre-existing article and add to that, then perhaps move it to a new name if there was consensus for that. I worked on this article with another editor, too, who should have a say. Would you mind if I got an administrator's help to put the new combined article back with the previous history? And, I am not sure about the new name, and I am not sure about having dropped one of the nice historic photos. I think the abruptness of your elimination of some of our final product, and all of our edit history, rubs me the wrong way. Would you please comment? doncram (talk) 02:49, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...I do like the new pics, but would have kept the old ones in the article as well. We did spend some time reviewing options and choosing it. I, too, object to the loss of edit history. I don't otherwise object to a merger. Coming from the wikiworld of National Historic Landmarks and Registered Historic Places, I like to have an article that uses the name of the landmark as the title. Lvklock (talk) 03:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Treasure Valley, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page .

--Bedford ^Pray 05:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept this invite to join the Mariners WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Seattle Mariners. Simply click here to accept!

]

Article Wizard

.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WookieInHeat (talk) 05:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Vatsun! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--

talk) 21:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply

]