User talk:Vazgen4

Hello, Vazgen4! adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! PhilKnight (talk) 20:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply ]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs Talk pages User scripts

Wikilinks

Concerning your recent edits, please don't create wikilinks for common terms. Details can be found at

WP:OVERLINK. Thank you. -- PhilKnight (talk) 17:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Talkback

, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 20:31, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Can't edit

I answered you on Spongefrog's page but then you moved to Javerts page, so rather than chase you all over the wiki I have come here. What article are you trying to edit? SpinningSpark 20:44, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow down

There is no need to post your message to everyone, there should be quite enough of us to deal with it now :). Please see Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback#User:Vazgen4. Thanks :) - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 20:48, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Unable to edit

Hi! The reason you haven't been given the

EditFilter rule designed specifically to stop people racking up enough edits for 'autoconfirmed' status by making lots of trivial changes to articles. I have reset your autoconfirmed status in the EditFilter; you should now be able to edit as an autoconfirmed user. Happy‑melon 20:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks alot, I had a feeling it was that filter log. Vazgen4 (talk) 20:51, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realize that either, Happy-melon. Thanks. JamieS93 21:05, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editing semi-protected pages

Hi Vazgen, I got your message. Since you have more than 10 edits over 4 days, you technically should be "autoconfirmed". However, I manually "confirmed" you just now (since you said something about not being able to edit semi-protected articles). Can you test and see if you can now? Thanks, JamieS93 20:55, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It works now thank you. Vazgen4 (talk) 20:56, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Just a quick note. (Looks around and wispers) Spongefrog will be your friend and give you a barnstar if you give him one. Oh and You should also think about making a userpage. Anyway have fun editing wikipedia!--

Expert 21:08, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Account blocked

I am blocking this account under

WP:DUCK as a sock of Zvartnotz2 (talk · contribs), see here and here

for context.

If you want to present an argument that you are not in fact a banned user generating throwaway accounts just for edit-warring, please request unblocking and another admin will consider the case, and if unblocked we will then take the long route via

dab (𒁳) 15:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Requesting unblock

How do I setup the unblock message? Im requesting unblock, please checkuser me, Im not the same person or related person of Zvartnot2 Thank you. Vazgen4 (talk) 16:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vazgen4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please checkuser me, im not the Zvartnot2 person the User Dbachmann here claims that I am. I have been blocked indefinite because of him for doing basically nothing wrong and being accused of someone else or a friend of someone else which was blocked indefninte. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Article interests are similar. User showed an unlikely knowledge for a newbie of auto-confirmation, semi-protection and the edit filter and the relationship between them. The strong desire this user demonstrated to achieve confirmed status without having a specific reason for needing it I also find suspicious. SpinningSpark 17:47, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.