User talk:Veera Dheera Sooran

Regarding your edit summary of the article "the sources are below in the main sections. that is just the introduction text and a summary of the article and does not need to be sourced!".

According to my knowledge the lead must conform to verifiability and other policies. Even though the presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article but some material, including direct quotations and contentious material about living persons, must be provided with an inline citation every time it is mentioned, regardless of the level of generality or the location of the statement. Source :Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section

But I have never read a Wikipedia Policy or a manual with quote "the introduction text and a summary of the article and does not need to be sourced!" . Please reply if there is one. KAS^(talk) 03:11, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, obviously. But, it will be better to add a upcoming film with a source. Or else some other editors who are not familiar with Tamil film industry might challenge to do so. Sorry if i interuppted you! --    L o g  X   21:19, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

converting the column from something specific and non trivial "Awards" to the non-specific "Notes" give

A project that has not completed

I suggest you actually read the policy.

• WP:BALASPS
  "An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. For example, discussion of isolated events, criticisms, or news reports about a subject may be verifiable and impartial, but still disproportionate to their overall significance to the article topic. This is a concern especially in relation to recent events that may be in the news. Note that undue weight can be given in several ways, including, but not limited to, depth of detail, quantity of text, prominence of placement, and juxtaposition of statements." The coverage of a not yet completed film should NOT be given the same weight as an actually completed project.
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Tables Tables "can be useful for a variety of content presentations on Wikipedia, though should be used only when appropriate; sometimes the information in a table may be better presented as prose paragraphs"
  • be open to all kinds of trivia
  • Wikipedia:WHENTABLE#Appropriate
    "Prose is preferred in articles as prose allows the presentation of detail and clarification of context, in a way that a table may not. Prose flows, like one person speaking to another, and is best suited to articles, because their purpose is to explain. ... In an article, significant items should normally be mentioned naturally within the text rather than merely tabulated."

What policies are you basing your position on? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:FILMOGRAPHY "The notes field should not be allowed to get overly cluttered." "Notes: This field is to include optional, additional information such as medium, episode titles, or awards--when there is no separate "Awards" section in the given article." - no where in the guidance does it say Notes should be used for upcoming not completed projects. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:48, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note that further conversation should take place on the article talk page in the discussion I have begun there. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:27, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

what has the ticket price got to do with the actor? Lol. No, an explicit prohibition is needed, else I will add it, simply because it has been the norm. You have provided a whole lot of stuff that has become totally irrelevant, after I showed you

WP:FILMOGRAPHY. I have provided what I needed to provide, now it's your turn. I'm waiting. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 14:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

A cookie for you!

Thank you very much for expanding RJ Balaji. The article would have nearly been deleted, as admins would have thought he is just a regular RJ. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 13:50, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Balaji is certainly one of the most popular RJs and amongst the most notable personalities in Tamil Nadu. He deserves an article :) Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 14:08, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

We are a team of Catherine Tresa and the information provided by us in her wiki page is fully authenticated by her. Please do not make any changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guruvara (talk • contribs) 15:50, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, good work expanding RJ Ophelia. In case u r creating an article on RJ Dheena, I found these sources u could use:

• http://www.hindu.com/mp/2009/06/06/stories/2009060651261200.htm
• https://www.facebook.com/dheenadayalann/about
• http://www.go-nxg.com/?p=1982
• http://www.rediff.com/getahead/2008/sep/12slide1.htm
• http://www.radioandmusic.com/content/editorial/news/rj-dheena-moulds-nextgen-radio-professionals
• http://www.dnaindia.com/india/1186304/report-rj-dheena-sets-new-guinness-record
• http://newindianexpress.com/entertainment/tamil/Dont-use-RJing-just-to-enter-films/2013/08/28/article1755042.ece
• http://www.thehindu.com/life-and-style/money-and-careers/the-next-wave/article2938947.ece
• http://epaper.newindianexpress.com/156950/Indulge-Chennai/06092013#dual/4/2 ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 13:42, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Scarlett Mellish Wilson, Veera Dheera Sooran!

Wikipedia editor Tritario just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice job with this! One thing though, I would recommend adding a picture of the person described in this page.

To reply, leave a comment on Tritario's talk page.

Learn more about

I am planning to take the article to GA status. Pls have a look at it; any suggestions for improvement? ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 06:37, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi brother. Even-though it is a dubbed version, the name of the characters and the channel which telecasts changes. And, to add some strength to my opinion, I have added many more things about the show in this article, which has not been described in the original version of the page. And moreover, is there any rule that 'a dubbed movie/show should not have its respective article'?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragavendaragul (talk • contribs) 13:06, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey dude! In this list, the section 'July-December' has been repeated. Since I don't wanna mess up the references (the 1st list has 28-55 and 2nd list has 28-66) I'm gonna ask you to take care of it. Thanks --

Hi in case u r editing it, I found much useful content in today's Chennai Times, page 11. U can view it in epaper mode. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 05:49, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The overall style guideline for tables "[Tables] can be useful for a variety of content presentations on Wikipedia, though should be used only when appropriate; sometimes the information in a table may be better presented as prose paragraphs or as an embedded list." ... "If a list is simple, it is generally better to use one of the standard Wikipedia list formats instead of a table. Lists are easier to maintain than tables, and are often easier to read."

There is nothing to sort! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:56, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know the Red Pen of Doom is acting a bit crazy of late bcos he wants every article to exactly follow MOS, and may even remove important sections in the process. But I request u not to badmouth him bcos he may retaliate violently, and that may lead to either of u getting blocked. Instead u can report him to any admin. Since u r one of the few most active users editing articles on Kollywood, I would not like to see u getting blocked for a silly reason. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 18:54, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hai. you are the one who edited Uravugal thodarkathai recently and forwarded the page to yeh rishta kya kehlata hai. Since the person whom you are talking about above disturbs me alot in updating the page, I need to complaint about him to someone. Those things which I add in that page, were deleted for no reason. I undid his version and so to show his power, that guy blocked me for 1 day. What can I do to stop that empty headed guy? He doesn't even know a single word about that show but he knows to edit the plot of it. If I don't have any chance to overrule that guy, I will end up from wikipedia by using the ugliest words on his talk page. waiting for your advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.221.232.138 (talk) 10:32, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. He probably has no idea of the show, but the reason he has given was that the additions you made were unsourced. I see that it's mainly the "Awards and nominations" sections that you have worked on. I know you must have spent a lot of time on that and while it's unfortunate that it's being removed, I have to say, that it doesn't have a single source. If you can add some references, reliable sources, then nobody can remove it. I will try to look into it too. But keep calm and be patient please. Don't do something silly and get blocked indefinitely. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 18:30, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sridevi filmography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:52, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm puzzled. You've deleted Malini 22 Palayamkottai, Rummy, and Velmurugan Borewells again, with the edit summary "Sorry, those 3 films didn't release, check the source update for releases of 27 December please". But the reference lists all three of them with December release dates. So why have you removed them please? Thanks, Ruby Murray 15:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	A Bright Year Ahead
	Wishing you a happy new year 2014! Let the new year be bright and positive for us editors! -- Kailash29792 (talk) 06:28, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reference that this is the film's actual title? If so, please add it to the article. If not, please undo the move immediately. DMacks (talk) 17:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Added now, takes some time till sources are available. You can trust me. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 18:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the prompt fix! Unfortunately, due to a long-term problem with rumor-mongering across many Indian/Tamil movie and actor pages, we really cannot wait for these sorts of refs. DMacks (talk) 20:36, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 7th Day (film), Veera Dheera Sooran!

Wikipedia editor Missionedit just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Missionedit's talk page.

Learn more about

I am impressed. Good work. Keep it up! – Soham (talk) 09:40, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Veera Dheera Sooran. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Poovarasam Peepee, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Prof. Mc (talk) 13:10, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Veera Dheera Sooran. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Poovarasam Peepee, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Prof. Mc (talk) 13:17, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Veera Dheera Sooran,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Poovarasam Peepee should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poovarasam Peepee .

If you're new to the process,

Thanks, Prof. Mc (talk) 14:01, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Vishnuvardhan (actor) by --Sunuraju (talk) 11:56, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Meera Nandan page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 3 (2012 Indian film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• "]. ''[[The Gulf Today]]''. 23 October 2012. Retrieved 11 November 2012.</ref> This Kolaveri Di")

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow

The comment you wrote while editing, "And Anirudh is saying every album is his best!" LMAO bro. Nice one there. Thx :D Ssven2 (User talk:Ssven2)

Would Anjaan make it to GA articles? Ssven2 (User talk:Ssven2)

(talk page stalker) Yes it has the potential, but it needs to be expanded with more content, have a better prose, have a complete plot, and must have ended its theatrical run (that is when the box office collections are stable). Kailash29792 (talk) 12:32, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it surely can. As Kailash said, it has the potential. The content is there and a lot more can be added easily, but it needs massive

copyediting. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:54, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Thx 4 trimming d plot, bro :D. U can make it as big as Gemini's plot, maybe. Ssven2 (talk)

If that's the case, then I'd better listen to you, bro. :D Thx again and continue to help me. Ssven2 (talk)

Done as per u mentioned. Removed the "casting" section and put it in the "cast" section. The page does look better ha ha :D.

Wikipedia:FILMCAST. Ssven2 (talk

)

Ada pavi. "Look at the infobox" haha nice one. :D. Ssven2 (talk)

Now that you explained to me about the editor, I understand your reason behind the removal of his name from the "Top" section. :D

Ssven2 (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reinserting content without providing

I removed content for which

verified the claim made in the article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:47, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Your edit [3] for example reintroduces the POV commentary. It reenters multiple awards for which there is no inline citation, it reintroduces multiple awards for which you have

sources that dont meet our reliably published source

standards and it reintroduces claims about the status of upcoming film projects where the source only states that an upcoming film project has been announced. Revert your edit now.

In addition your claim of ", DON'T you undo my edits with one click!!!" is incorrect, there were multiple removals done with careful edit summaries explaining why.

Revert yourself or provide the necessary sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:55, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amortias (T)(C) 19:32, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to reply to

Ok, bro and thanks . BTW most of them are IP editors who write unwanted things, therefore are not valid. So, their edits are reverted. (Ssven2 - talk)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Bobby Simha, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 20:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

re your message [4] you should actually look and see that there were in fact policy based reasons for the removal

• meaningless hogdoodle even if sourced has no place. WP:TRIVIA / WP:ONUS.

Please read

Please join the centralized discussion at Talk:Bobby_Simha#Descriptions -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:34, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to protect that page right now. However, unless a more reliable source can be found her birthday should be left out. Pleas discuss this at

it is actually her but you're probably right, then we should remove it altogether. On the other hand, this User:Truesideofyou has been adding/changing the date of birth on several pages without adding any reference or adding very poor sources. Just wanted to bring it your knowledge. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:29, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think its high time you start clearing your talkpage of finished discussions, maybe you could even

Yeah, I should but too lazy to do that. Mostly I have these Disambiguation link notifications on my page, I will clean them up some day. And that's great. He learns fast, I was expecting him to make some good contributions. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, bro. I have nominated

GOCE requests page, and I am currently expanding Padayappa. —Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 15:56, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For your contributions which help made VIP a GA. —Ssven2 speak 2 me 15:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply ]

Seasonal Greets!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015 !!!

Hello Veera Dheera Sooran, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015. Happy editing, —Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:29, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Thank you for the wishes and congratulations on your successive GA successes, way to go! Btw, regarding VIP, I came across this article, which explicitly states the budget and gross figures of the film. It may be a better source than the one currently in VIP's page. Have a look at it and decide yourself! Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:37, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Puthiya Paravai

My nomination of the film for GA has passed. This is the fifth Sivaji Ganesan film to get GA status! —Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 04:21, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

	Have a bright year ahead!
	Do hope to see you contribute to at least a few GAs this time. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:54, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year! All I can say is that I'll contribute wherever whenever I can. :) Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 13:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nakshatra (actress), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Carmel College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Enthiran - First Superstar FA!

Great news! Enthiran is promoted! My first FA success! Hooray! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:38, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some facts

Although Jai's role in Raja Rani was indeed a supporting one, he yet got the second billing in the credits. And we list according to the credits. We should also refrain from adding rumours here as per

WP:RUMOUR. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:08, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Wow, is it? Didn't know that. I usually check the credits first before I make changes, didn't check this one though. Very silly this is. And where did I add rumours?? I am, in fact, removing all rumours added by fanboys. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 12:50, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yennai Arindhaal still has many rumours which need deleting. And I don't think Amy Jackson was ever considered for it. The source mentions only Trisha. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:05, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh oops. I was just undoing the edit by a fanboy, didn't check the source. I can't go through the whole article and all links and check whether everything is true. I reverted back to the last good version, so I assumed it would be true. Sorry about that. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 13:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16 Vayathinile

16 Vayathinile, which you had expanded once upon a time, has now passed its GA review. I thank you for those edits. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, went through the article, it's superbly written. I don't think I have contributed much to it, it's now a totally different (and far far better) article. Congrats to you and the main contributor, excellent job! Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 13:01, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. :-) Thamizhan1994 (^{Appo Pesu}) 01:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pathala Bhairavi

talk) 15:18, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Missamma

Hi. I'm here with a small request. That is, can you please translate the Tamil language references available

talk) 06:29, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Oh hey, sorry for the late response, I was absent for a week. I don't know if you still require my help. I glanced through the articles, they are quite long and I'm not sure whether I can spend enough time to fully translate them. If nobody else is willing to translate the texts I can do that but you would have to wait for some time. In any case, all the best! Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 16:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done with it, bro! All the article requires now is a thorough copy-edit for grammar, style, cohesion, tone and/or spelling. Currently the gates for GOCE are closed and i placed the c/e tag on the top upon Baffle gab1978's suggestion. Can you c/e the article?

talk) 16:47, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Okay, I will have a look at it. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 14:18, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, have done some editing. I have not seen the film and I felt the plot was hard to comprehend. Some context is missing and some clairification is needed. I have made some notes and hidden the text, so please have a look. I tried my best but I think it would be good if other editors could also go through the article and help improve it. Again all the best! Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 17:23, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the c/e. I've resolved those hidden comments just now. Now i believe the plot is better and clean. And, surely i shall ask another editors to give a c/e upon your suggestion.

talk) 05:45, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Reference errors on 15 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Sri Divya page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator

. Thanks,

talk) 00:22, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Radhika Apte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lion (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

talk page

.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose

^{Imperatrix Mundi} 13:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Calicutspecialist (talk) 01:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Critical reception of Paayum Puli (2015 film)

Hi bro! I've been working on

talk) 09:20, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

I saw the article and as I said before, it looks really good to me. I've just rearranged the critical reception section, moving the more positive to the top and the more negative ones to the end, but it's difficult since almost all reviews are very mixed. Overall, the article looks very fine, in my opinion :) Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot bro! I may take it to GA status in the future, that's why i developed it now to such extent (to avoid loss of potential info which usually die). I imagined it to be definitely better than Pandiya Naadu and just like any other Vishal and Suseenthiran's film in the near past, the female lead role is horribly written. Period!

talk) 16:00, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

So is this Pavan's first attempt at making a non-Telugu film a GA? Then good luck with it! Veera, I think even you have the potential to make a GA some day. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:05, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This can't be confirmed as my first non-Telugu GA attempt

talk) 16:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Kailash, you want to know a secret? In the past (under a different name) I have taken some articles to GA status (in collaboration with other editors). I find the whole process too strenuous so I don't do that anymore. I'm perfectly happy with cleaning up, copy-editing and expanding here and there. Maybe some day I will do that again. Maybe... :) Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 16:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't tell me you follow

sockpuppetry. But new accounts created due to loss of passwords may be acceptable. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Oh god, no! I didn't log in for a long time and had forgotten the password. I never wanted to create a new account actually but once you edited here it's hard to not come back. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:36, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@

Pavanjandhyala and Kailash29792: Happened to notice Pavan mentioning " I imagined it to be definitely better than Pandiya Naadu and just like any other Vishal and Suseenthiran's film in the near past, the female lead role is horribly written. Period!" I would personally say that the female lead role might have been written like that due to the ability of the actress to perform. Kajal is alright but still needs to work on her language. Knowledge of the language makes it easier for the director to give a meaty role to the actress. Pity that we hardly get a proper-Tamil speaking heroine in the industry among the current bunch as that creates a setback in the film's story/script. Its time filmmakers looked past glamour in case of actresses and focused more on their performance and dubbing. Take Sruthi Haasan for example. A half-Tamil (Sarika's from Delhi), her dubbing in Poojai (snippets from Adithya Channel) was horrible to say the least and lead me to think that she was better in 7aum Arivu. Why did they choose her for Best Actress at Filmfare when Samantha was better in Manam? Samantha has some potential (only some) but she needs to be more versatile than just submit herself to "Girl-next-door" roles. Hansika tries hard but still her voice would never suit her acting (see Puli's audio launch for further details). So its only right that her voice is dubbed. Its about time Nayanthara dubbed in her own voice for her roles. Trisha's trying something new with Nayagi. Glad to see Jo back. Looking forward to seeing her in more films in the future. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

The main reason why I think Tamil producers typically choose non-Tamil actresses (mostly those from Bombay) for their films is because of their glamour quotient, that could be a salvaging moment. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:40, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Right you are, Kailash. BTW, on Lakshmi Menon, she's more of what one would call a "Good luck charm" instead of an actress as all the films that she featured in so far were successful. She needs to choose roles which offer her more scope (which she most probably would do after her education). As I said, its time filmmakers looked past glamour in case of actresses and focused more on their performance and dubbing (especially the latter!). — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 05:44, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

Naanum Rowdydhaan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Single. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited D. Imman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pokkiri Raja. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mayabazar

I've nominated this article for FAC which also happens to be my first attempt. It is also the first Indian Telugu film article to be nominated for such status. If interested, please leave your comments

talk) 09:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom Elections 2016

: Voting now open!

Hello, Veera Dheera Sooran. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nerukku Ner (2015 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nerukku Ner (2015 film). Since you had some involvement with the Nerukku Ner (2015 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:43, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Veera Dheera Sooran. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject

.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Iruvar Ullam (2017 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Iruvar Ullam (2017 film). Since you had some involvement with the Iruvar Ullam (2017 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:21, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Scarlett Wilson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scarlett Wilson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scarlett Wilson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FitIndia ^{Talk Mail} 08:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Avantika Mohan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Avantika Mohan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable

.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:11, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Sippai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sippai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sippai (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Your edits may be far and few, but your expansions are legendary.DareshMohan (talk) 02:37, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]