This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of First Federal Bank, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.1stfedbank.com/aboutParent.cfm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on
prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Los Alamos National Bank, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.lanb.com/lanb/about.asp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources
.
Please
for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Bob Bresnahan
Another editor has added the {{
prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Removing Tags
Please stop removing improvement tags without addressing the concerns in the tags. Tags are there to help improve articles. I am placing the citation tag back on The Money Store article, please do not remove it unless you add references to the article.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 07:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Last I checked there were no sources, just an external link to the official site. But it seems that the article was speedy deleted... so the point is a moot now.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 07:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Money Store
Article had no verifiable independent sources to establish notability, and claimed discounted rates sourced only to the company. Capitalising MONEY STORE is also spammy. Content appeared to be list of directors and, bizarrely, a list of US states, nothing on the size of the company, amount lent etc. The lack of evidence of notability, combined with a degree of spamminess seemed enough for deletion. Jimfbleak (talk) 08:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Deltron Event II without explaining why on the talk page. Could you please elaborate about why this article should be either improved or deleted? White 720 (talk) 14:40, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
You added multiple tags, as I see you've done on many articles in a short span of time, to
Deltron Event II. Is an expert's commentary really needed? Could you please identify the weasel words? The article has also survived an Articles for Deletion as it has numerous reliable, verifiable sources to back up this album's existence and notability. (The album is still delayed, but that alone is no reason to delete the article.) White 720 (talk) 14:48, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply