User talk:Vnisanian2001

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 10:43, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for restoring the list of DVD's section to

edit 1

Please do not add or change content without

edit 2

Please do not add or change content without

This is an automated message from

Hi Vnisanian2001, I saw what happened here, and what you should have done was perform a

page move, rather than copy and past it yourself. Since you were the only contributor, other than a bot, it's not a big deal, but if other editors had contributed to the original article, it could have been an issue. If you need any help with this on the future, just let me know, and I will try to help. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 22:20, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "List of Mr. Belvedere episodes". Thank you. --George Ho (talk) 05:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You must respond at

WP:DRN#List of Mr. Belvedere episodes, not my talk page or yours. --George Ho (talk) 06:03, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply

]

DRN message is closed as premature, yet I don't think you can change your mind about general readers. Do you have to force readers to accept the production order arrangement and such details that are less interesting and irrelevant to the topic? Let's talk more at Talk:list of Mr. Belvedere episodes. --George Ho (talk) 18:28, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joel Gilbert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Gilbert (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

		Holiday Cheer
		Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS

By the way, I missed the original AFD and have no idea know what the original version looked like last May.... but issues were addressable, and it has been going through some major improvements,[5] so I wanted to thank you for bringing Joel Gilbert back to article space to serve the project. Well done. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:18, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand the nominator sending your 1084 characters (183 words) unsourced stub to AFD.[6] However, since you first commented, I did a little

Also, please do not introduce deliberate factual errors as you did in these edits. The program premiered in 1983.

AldezD (talk) 12:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

What you "heard from a former staff member on the show" does not meet

AldezD (talk) 14:22, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, Vnisanian2001. You have new messages at AldezD's talk page.
Message added 12:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Also, please remember to sign your posts on talk pages.

Please familiarize yourself with

AldezD (talk) 15:30, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Make the Grade, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

• If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
• If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
• If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. [14]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Repeated addition of unsourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:10, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your recent edits, [17] please review the guidelines at

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Hot Seat (talk show). Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article
  dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards
  .
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's
  Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
  .

Hello, Vnisanian2001. You have new messages at Talk:Bad (Michael Jackson song).
Message added 19:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Mkdw^talk 21:26, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Notes: You have been blocked for a period of 3 months under
  WP:CONCENSUS have been brought forth to your attention and not responded to. You have been blocked twice before and after this block expires any further indiscretions will likely lead to an indefinite block. Mkdw^talk 21:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Hi, Vnisanian. Your three-month block mentoned above expired only recently, and it's apparent that you have returned to disruptive editing. See this ANI thread. I'm afraid I have blocked you indefinitely, just as Mkdw warned you might happen. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 23:38, 30 June 2014 (UTC).[reply]