User talk:JPxG

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from
User talk:WegweiserBot
)


The Dumbarton Rail Bridge in San Francisco Bay, July 2021. Canon EOS 650D. 1/125, ISO 100, f/6.3



Perms

Did you mean to give yourself all those perms indefinitely? – 2804:F14:80B7:8201:90E7:C193:821D:E8C2 (talk) 09:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@0xDeadbeef: You removed autopatrolled by accident, when removing the redundant groups. – 2804:F14:8085:6201:EC0A:3D07:F537:12EF (talk) 04:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oracle not updating

Just wanted to ping you to let you know it appears the Oracle for Deletion page has stopped updating as of Feb 14th. Is this something that is in the works to be fixed? This information is very insightful and useful for the community, so it'd be great to see this data source continue. Thank you for all that you've done to create and maintain this. 74.109.236.228 (talk) 12:55, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed it had stopped updating when the Toolforge grid was deprecated -- what it needs is just to be SSHed into and migrated over to the new Kubernetes thing -- but while I was preparing to do this, I also noticed that nobody had said anything about it stopping, so I figured it might just not be worth the effort. Now that somebody has said something, I will go try to do something about it... jp×g🗯️ 18:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-21

MediaWiki message delivery 23:02, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cheetomalik4 duck

The user, you blocked is back under a different username. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 04:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dolorem ipsum/pb-cond

Template:Dolorem ipsum/pb-cond and others have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Gonnym (talk) 09:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I said this at the TfD, but I'd be happy to speedy-delete those if they've been replaced by the module (it's just housekeeping at that point -- MediaWiki just makes it a pain in the ass to merge files). jp×g🗯️ 09:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Medicine May 2024 Newsletter

Issue 22—May 2024


WikiProject Medicine Newsletter

Hello all. Another irregular edition of the newsletter. I was inspired to collect this after seeing several medicine-interested editors nominate their first

good article
. Please review a GA nomination if you have time, and help support our colleagues' efforts:

Recognized content (since April 1)

National Public Health Laboratory (Sudan) nom. FuzzyMagma, reviewed by Snoteleks
Nighat Arif nom. Launchballer, reviewed by Chiswick Chap




Nominated for review

Hepatic hydrothorax nom. Aeschylus
Adrenal crisis nom. CursedWithTheAbilityToDoTheMath
Exhaustion disorder nom. Draken Bowser
Bite registration nom. Candle1, under review by Esculenta
Charles Wambebe nom. Vanderwaalforces

featured article review. You can contribute at the FAR page or the article talk page
.

WP:MED News

  • Wikipedia:Good article reassessment is back in business, with a new process and new coordinators. If you see medicine-related GAs that may no longer meet the GA criteria, feel free to nominate them for attention/reassessment (please, not too many at once, lest we get overwhelmed). I'll incorporate them into the listings above.
  • Maintenance category of the month: Articles with topics of unclear notability (I've listed just the 36 that start with "A"; there are 398 total).
    Note for the curious: 24,211 of the 57,554 articles (42%) tagged as part of WP:MED have some maintenance tag.

Newsletter ideas, comments, and criticisms welcome here.

You are receiving this because you added your name to the WikiProject Medicine mailing list. If you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine at 21:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Tech News: 2024-22

MediaWiki message delivery 00:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question about sourcing with this diff

You (IMO correctly) added this to my edit. I was curious about what you would consider a sufficient RS here, does it need to be a proper article, or can I just cite a YouTube Video from him? Or do we just need a Mandy-ish statement? FortunateSons (talk) 18:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2: Hacking Sunday (+preview of June 8 Wiknic)

June 2: Hacking Sunday @ Prime Produce

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our Hacking Sunday at Prime Produce in Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan. It is intended primarily for technical contributors, though newcomers are welcome as well! The event runs for the whole day, though you are welcome to come by for as little or as long as you'd like.

All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct and Wikimedia's Technical Code of Conduct.

A documentary filmmaker will be in attendance, working on Rabbit Hole, which aims to document Wikipedia's community to showcase how our network tackles important questions about how history is recorded. They will be in attendance to film snippets of this gathering for the documentary. It is completely optional to be a part of the film and there will be protocols in place if you wish to not be filmed. If there are any questions about the filming please reach out to the filmmaker, Meg Vatterott ([email protected]).

Meeting info:

P.S. Next up will be Sat June 8 Wiknic on Governors Island!

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:02, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ADL RfC FYI

For what it’s worth, the ADL RfC has been listed at WP:Closure requests, and the archiving was noted there. Given the size of the discussion, I was under the impression that it was best to leave it in the archive until a closer was ready to publish their closure signed, Rosguill talk 12:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you mention it, that does seem like it could bring some benefit (e.g. no more comments to look over). I figured it was just an error, since it was archived by the bot and not a person. Do you think it would be smart to just put a box around it like:
This discussion is awaiting closure.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
? jp×g🗯️ 12:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That could work too. I’m wondering whether there’ll be any issues for the archive bot since Archive 439 is now an empty page, but that may be a non-issue. signed, Rosguill talk 12:21, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]