User talk:Whpq/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

→

Archive 10

Al Ramirez

Please reconsider deletion. While being snubbed by local media Al Ramirez has been added the Twitter Suggested User List which signifies some signifigance. He now has 200,000 followers and is cleared ranked as the highest Conservative among all GOP candidates among the TCOT movement. In short time he used the internet to raise his visibility and is a frequent speaker at many GOP clubs in California. There has been more coverage of his campaign's use of Iphone App, one of the first in the nation and could set a new precedent in how campaigns expand the use of technology. He may not have been elected before but the SurveyUSA poll done in November shows him comepetitive in favorables. With 200000 followers and growing at 2K per day there is an audience that may want more information from a reliable and verified source on what little is known. Plus in a state with a 36% Hispanic population and as the only Hispanic on the ballot he could be a major wild card in the election. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.171.235.90 (talk) 21:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

The AFD for Al Ramirez was open for seven days. That would have been the appropriate venue for discussion on whether the article should be kept or deleted. The AFD has been closed so posting on my talk page will not change anything. If you believe that the article has been deleted without proper due process, you can discuss this with the closing administrator at his talk page, User talk:Jayjg. If you are still unsatisfied after that, you can request a deletion review, Wikipedia:Deletion review. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 22:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Ogi Ogas

Hi there. As a contributor to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogi Ogas, you may be interested to know I have re-nominated the page for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogi Ogas (2nd nomination). Robofish (talk) 16:33, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Trae Lindley

I've spent a lot of time looking for sources this week and there isn't a snowball in hells chance that article can ever offer notability. Prods are for articles which potentially could be expanded using notable sources. The subject is not worthy of an article and a google search indicates this. I agree there have been way too many deletions of late. Those articles which are notable and have reliable sources to back them up should be expanded or prodded and the blatantly non notable cruft taken to AFD. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 19:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh I agree, no worries. The reason why sources couldn't be found to expand it is because ii isn't notable! I am on your side, I try to salvage content first and find sources too, but there are a few articles which jusitifably should be deleted asap like this one where no RS can be found and the subject is of dubious notability. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 19:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Isn't that a little backwards? If it is blatantly non-notable, we don't really need more editors to review the situation. Thus instead of AFD, PROD makes more sense. If they appear to be notable but can't be sourced, then AFD and not PROD would be the preferred route so that more editors are aware of the issue. -- Whpq (talk) 19:24, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Whatever, sorry I trod on your toes. Not all prods get deleted you know. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 19:26, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm not offended, so there's no apology necessary. I realize that not all PRODs get deleted, but if somebody objects, I have anything I've put on PROD watchlisted so I'd end up taking it to AFD. But in many cases, such as this where it is essentially a drive-by article creation, it doesn't get contested. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Yeah I know. But AFD in my view is a more solid way of getting more people to comment on a topic and forming a better consensus of deletion. I think in most cases AFDs can be avoided if sources exist to expand an article. I would speedy this article and would think it probably is speediable but I'd like to see what others think... Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 19:39, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Justo Almario bio

Hi, we currently represent Justo Almario, and have tried variuos times to change his bio to his current bio and not something that was written 15 years ago. You've continued to change it back, please leave it with his current bio. Should you have questions or concerns please contact us directly at [email protected] or via phone at (310) 295-4259 x 703.

Should you want to see his current bio you can also visit www.justoalmario.net.

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by EBManagement (talk • contribs) 07:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Watcom Assembler

Hi, Whpq. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JWASM, a discussion in which you participated, was closed as redirect to Open Watcom Assembler. Open Watcom Assembler has now been nominated for deletion due to notability concerns. If you would like to participate in the discussion, please comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Watcom Assembler. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 09:16, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of Boo, Gerald J Tate

Hello Melanie

My name is Gerald J Tate, and I am writing to you regarding the citations and things needed for my Page. I have newspaper copies from five major newspapers in Northern Ireland regarding my work, which I would be happy to send, if you can kindly give me a link. I have also been talking on our major radio stations here, twice on Downtown radio, twice on Radio U-105, and my first book was read out on a weekly thing with radio Star. I also have copies of the Book awards, and I don't self publish now. I have signed a contract with Spinetinglers publishing as they are now representing me. All paperwork copies can be sent if needed. However,I will understand if you still wish to delete my file, but there are some Northern Ireland people on there with just a couple of poems etc, and I've never heard of them. Anyway, I'll leave it up to you to decide. Thank you and all the best.

Gerald J Tate, Gerry [email address removed] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.18.165.213 (talk) 10:04, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

I've taken the liberty of removing your email address because Wikipedia's a very visible site and addresses on here are ripe for harvesting by spambots. I'm about to post a reply at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerald J Tate, where you should go with further comments. Olaf Davis (talk) 21:31, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Cave conservancy

Sorry I didn't see the note on the Talk page. I've moved the page as you asked. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:41, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Politics, Religion and Her (song)

Since you participated in the AFD for this article, I thought you might be interested in a discussion here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:31, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Eric Bibb

Hi. When I wrote the original piece, the text was a result of collaborative discussions with Bibb's manager. Later, the text was used by him for the web site that you see today. So, while I agree that the deleted parts could be better written, they are most definitely NOT copyvio, as the Wiki text was written first! What can be done? I will try to write the deleted part in a different way, but when I do, please do not jump to a copyvio conclusion again. Thanks. -- ALGRIF talk 15:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

• As there is no way for any wikipedia editor to know this, then something should be noted on the article talk page to prevent something like this from happening again. You may want to register this information through
  reliable sources, which a manager certainly is not. Regards. -- Whpq (talk
  ) 15:54, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

GrahamBould

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I routinely cycle through the various CCIs, and every time I note that you are still actively working on Graham Bould, I mentally bow to you. :) There isn't a barnstar big enough for that. I just figured that instead of mentally bowing down, I might as well say so. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm slowly plowing my way through it. Based on my current rate, I expect that it will be the year 2020 before it's cleared.  :( -- Whpq (talk) 21:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

What have you been finding in these recent sections? You know Graham was the first; at this point, we don't even list articles where contributors have only made edits of less than 100k. Some stuff may get past us, but with two dozen open CCIs, we have to balance the reality of the work force with the need for due diligence. If things have been clear lately, it may be time to put that one to bed and congratulate you heartily for a job very, very well done. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:23, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

In plowing through the backlog, the edits made tend to fall into one of three categories.

1. Creating long lists (not a creative work) so no issues.

2. Copyeditting existing text (contributed by others) such as slight changes to wording, adding paragraph breaks, adding wikilinks, and adding images. Again no issues with this.

3. Reverting vandalism. Removing text like "HA!HA!HA! TUNA TASTES GOOD!!!!!!!OMG!!!!!" is a good thing!

There was only one edit out of all the ones I've been going through that was an edit of substance that added text to the article. I couldn't find a source for the the text but removed it as a presumptive copyvio. I'd say that that is is very unlikely anything of significance based on the articles I've been reviewing. -- Whpq (talk) 21:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Then I think it's time to put this one to bed and free you up for more productive things. :D I'll archive it accordingly. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 21:55, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The I-would-give-you-a-day-if-I-could Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		You gave the cleanup at the first unofficial CCI almost a full year of consistent attention and hard work. If that isn't tireless, I don't know what is. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Magicians of Love

My changes to the page, Magicians of Love, is my own. As for to the link you provided, that page is written by me as well —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Hongster (talk • contribs) 15:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

If you wish to donate the material to Wikipedia, see

unsourced. -- Whpq (talk

) 18:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

If thats is so. Remove for all i care. I was just kind to try contributing to wiki. So this is what i get for being kind =.= — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Hongster (talk • contribs)

The intent was not to discourage you from editting, but rather explain to you why the text you added was removed. I'll expand on this on your talk page. -- Whpq (talk) 11:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

deleting a page - natalia sosnina

Hi there, Natalia sosnina would really like to have her page deleted. how long will this take usually? thanks very much Best Regards Kim —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fullerkim (talk • contribs) 19:59, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

An AFD normally runs for a period of 7 days. After 7 days, and admin will evaluate the discussion and determine an outcome based on concensus. And if teh concensus is to delete, the the admin will delete the article. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion has all the details. -- Whpq (talk) 20:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

P90X

Thanks for your hard work - the article is a lot better now!Autarch (talk) 17:59, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

No problems. It just looked like it needed to have a good trim. -- Whpq (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: "Sensible Erection" site

Regarding the deleted Sensibleerection.com, specifically re: outside sources of notoriety, there was a Fox News report: http://www.gamepolitics.com/2008/07/02/controversy-comes-increased-online-traffic-torture-game —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.87.220.9 (talk) 08:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Deleted Article : Shri Laxmi Narayan Dev Vadtal Gadi Acharya Parampara

Hi, i posted about subjected article yesterday but it has been deleted by you, i don't understand the reason, if it is just a copyright issue then please let me know because the site called www.swaminarayanvadtalgadi.org is being operates by us. so if u need copyright permission then let me know how can i send you permission letter and where ? my wiki user name is Hari1008 and my name is pranav Thanx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hari1008 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Request for removal of coi tag.

Hello, I am the author of the First Northern Bank page. All information I have provided is neutral and does not promote the bank in any way. Because of this, I would like to respectfully ask that the coi tag be removed. Thank you --207.104.165.2 (talk) 16:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Not Myself Tonight

Do you have a reason to suspect something, or did you place "notavote" on the AFD as a precaution?—Kww(talk) 16:36, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

It's a cautionary action. It always look s a little suspicious when new editors pop up out of nowhere to keep songs with no clear rationale beyond its existence and imminent release. -- Whpq (talk) 16:39, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Unblock please

I am collateral damage. -- Whpq (talk) 13:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock #1865663 lifted or expired. The block appears to be expired, please post again if there are still issues. Request handled by: TNXMan Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Not expired. I had just lifted it, but edit conflicted on the response. :) Whpq, please consider using Ebay or some other forum to sell David Caruso bobbleheads. ;) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

So that's what I was up to whilst unconcious! ;) Thanks! -- Whpq (talk) 13:55, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Annual Events

Based on the discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Snowzilla, I put a comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (events) asking for thoughts about the notability of annual events. As a major participant in the Snowzilla conversation, I thought you might want to know. Dunncon13 (talk) 18:42, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Survey on quality control policies

As part of a project funded by the European Commission (QLectives), we are collecting and analysing data to study quality control mechanisms and inclusion/deletion policies in Wikipedia. According to our records, you participated in a large number of AfD. We are currently soliciting editors with a long record of participation in AfD discussions to send us their feedback via a very informal survey.

The survey takes less than 5 minutes and is available at this URL. Should you have any questions about this project, feel free to get in touch.

Thanks for your help! --DarTar (talk) 10:13, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

This calls for something extraordinary

		The Guillaume Bastille award
		For your part in the incredibly speedy completion of this CCI, I hereby bestow on you the Guillaume Bastille award, newly created for the occasion because he's a fast guy with a compatibly licensed image. Thank you for your part in helping to take this across the finish line in record-breaking time. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:40, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Created just for the occasion. :D Here's hoping that Guillaume Bastille would be honored...and that the image I'm using really is free, because it would be just like the universe to jeer at me in that way. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:40, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Gee thanks! The universe can be cruel, but in this case, it looks quite legit. The photo is part of a whole series from the Olympics that this person took. It's great that they decided to share with everybody by licensing it under the CC license. -- Whpq (talk) 20:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

nope 've not copied plots from anywhere....i thought we could quote some articles etc hence the mistake mate! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smartk1987 (talk • contribs) 09:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Aga khan lawsuit

Please read the content of

<>Multi‑Xfer<> (talk

) 04:45, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Also, note the header at

<>Multi‑Xfer<> (talk

) 04:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I disagree that the material consisted of an attempt to communicate with somebody, or is a personal rant or attack. However, I don't see much use in taking this discussion any further so let's consider the matter closed. -- Whpq (talk) 13:06, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Claudia Costa

What Wikipedia is not

").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

sign your comments

with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

articles for deletion

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a

talk

) 01:06, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

PROD of Kibinda

You proposed deletion of

Kibinda to Ibinda (Kibinda is an alternate name for the language) but, because there were a number of different uses of "Kibinda", I created the dab page. This is not all that uncommon at for dab pages (cf., Nan-Hsi, Orthos, Rusich). Is there policy basis for your position? — AjaxSmack

00:57, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

The examples you show are also rather poor. But in any case, per

WP:DISAMBIG, "Disambiguation is required whenever, for a given word or phrase on which a reader might use the "Go button", there is more than one existing Wikipedia article to which that word or phrase might be expected to lead." Kibinda doesn't distinguish between any articles because those article do not exist. Untile they exist, then there is no need for a disambiguation page. I did miss the language because of the way the entries were set up. This actually should be a redirect as you originally were going to do. Thanks for pointing it out. I'll withdraw the PROD and redirect. Regards. -- Whpq (talk

) 10:28, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

The quote you give says "article to which that word or phrase might be expected to lead" but doesn't say that article need be solely about that subject. It could redirect to a list or a larger more inclusive entity. Merely having no articles of a particular title doesn't necessarily obviate the need for a dab page. I won't argue with you on this one except that, while I see the need to keep dab pages well pruned (I do it a good bit myself), I think the entries at

geobias than to lack of notability. — AjaxSmack

02:55, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Brian Quintana for U.S. Senate

Brian Quintana is running to serve in the U.S. Senate like John F. Kennedy and Barack Obama before him. How is that not noteworthy. Is it because he is Latino? He appears to be hated on this site, but this is not the forum to sabotage his campaign. The personal page for Brian Quintana appears to have hundreds of changes by the same glum lot. This site is not intended to influence people but to state facts. Where did it go so wrong??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yourmistaken (talk • contribs)

The discussion is occurring at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Quintana for U.S. Senate. There is no point in discussing this on my talk page. -- Whpq (talk) 20:18, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Carter Fleming

I was given a message by you to add tags back but I have added in cited references and made the article more wikipdia standard and took them off. Can you elaborate as to why you have reinstated the tags? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martijean (talk • contribs) 15:18, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

There are two tags present. {{

WP:SELFPUB). As such, all of the sourcing is primary. -- Whpq (talk

) 15:34, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Bandwagon music

RE. Bandwagon Music

Hi,

Once again my entry for Bandwagon Music is to be deleted.

I am beginning to think there is some kind of conspiracy against Bandwagon Music!

Here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_record_labels you have hundreds of music labels the majority of which have nothing notable about them.

To pick a couple randomly http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12_Apostles_%28record_label%29 or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3_Beads_of_Sweat or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aardvark_Records

Why are they not being deleted? There is many many more like this.

Bandwagon Music is THE ONLY MUSIC PUBLISHING CO-OPERATIVE on the planet!

Surely that is a more notable quality than most?

Thank you

Jules Stevens —Preceding unsigned comment added by Juleseleven11 (talk • contribs) 10:51, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

The discussion as to why the article is being deleted is being held at

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, and is not a convincing reason for keeping your article. As for being the only music publishing co-operative n the world, if that is notable, then you need to demonstrate that by showing coverage in reliable sources, in the form of newspaper or magazine coverage. -- Whpq (talk

) 10:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello!

{{

help}}Hello, Whpq! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Signature icon.png or using four tildes (Ulrich Von Happlestein (talk

) 22:09, 16 May 2010 (UTC)); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 18:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

what was your question Sophie(:

• 
  Hi Dudey
• 
  LOL

No help needed, although thanks for the offer. It looks like user:Ulrich Von Happlestein slapped the above message up. It was not created XLinkBot as the sig would imply, and there was a "helpme" stuffed in there. -- Whpq (talk) 22:28, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Knezevo problem.

Thank you very much, but I better don´t intervene. I explained you on the talk page of the article: [1]. Regards, FkpCascais (talk) 19:46, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Nemagic continued his vandalism, despite your final warning. [2] Hopefully you could do something about it, as he is persistent, showing no sign of cooperation. (76.29.100.8 (talk) 19:24, 25 May 2010 (UTC)).

Chandana Prasanna

you have remove that my speedy deletion tab after mention here is credible assertion of notability in winning a film award . but It is totally in correct information and there no any reference or link. this is totally self promotion. Any persons can say that i have won award from academy or other festival such as .without proving how do you put those things on worldwide encyclopedia .wipe —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wipeouting (talk • contribs) 17:40, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Reply - The criteria for speedy deletion are very narrow. An article need not meet notability to escape speedy deletion. Looking at the specifics of

WP:A7, "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source." There is no requirement for there to be sources supporting the claim. That is why a speedy deletion is not appropriate. Regards. -- Whpq (talk

) 18:35, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Nobel of X

Please take a look at the proposal I made in

talk

06:49, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

I'll just stay out of the conversation. regards. -- Whpq (talk) 10:21, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Rich Pecci

He is one of the leads in the ensemble cast of Life During Wartime, His name is on the poster! Also, this is his first LEAD role. The others were principle roles in his previous work. however, do keep in mind.. most of the cast.. i.e. Charlotte Rampling, Paul Reubens, Ally Sheedy have the same same calliber role as he. He has been mentioned in more than the articles that you have mentioned. And will probably be nominated for an IFC award. Also, his charecter is the only charecter that has been in almost every single solondz film. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moviekid3000 (talk • contribs) 14:08, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

The article has been deleted as per the consensus reached in the discussion at

reliable sources was not established by either the article or any of the editors involved in the deletion discussion. If you have such sources, you can try to create the article again. If you would like an opinion on such sources before creating an article, I am willing to look at them. Regards. -- Whpq (talk

) 14:17, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Farm Fresh Food

The Goodies quote sections are a special feature of the Goodies episodes articles, and are intended to show the humour of The Goodies, to those people who do not know the series.

I have now removed the quote section from the Farm Fresh Food article altogether and moved the quote, itself, into the plot section (and have mentioned this on the discussion page for the article). Figaro (talk) 16:18, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. That looks fine. cheers! -- Whpq (talk) 16:25, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Spatial index

Hi, Why not "wikify", but "unref"? The term "spatial index" is common, e.g. Grid (spatial index), so I don't see the need for references. But the article is a bullet list, that needs wikification. I'd btw. also concur with merging it into spatial databases, actually; I see little benefit of keeping the indexes separate currently (given that there is no text). The properties of the individual indexes can still be discussed on the actual index structure pages. --Chire (talk) 17:19, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

The list is already wikilinked. Using a list format for that is appropriate. I'm not sure what [[WP:|wikification]] you are looking to have done. As for merging to spatial database, that actually sounds like a good idea. Fell free to boldly merge it. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 17:25, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

autoconfirmed

to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here

.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:24, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Plot summary

Paul Osborn sees the man who has murdered his father years before while walking trough Paris. When he sees the murderer again his memories take over. After a detective found out about Henri Kanarack Osborn plans to kill him. McVey comes to Paris in order to meet some experts on the case of a couple decapitations, where the bodies and heads were found deep-frozen. A few days later Osborn tries to kill Kanarack, but when he´s is nearly dead a third person enters the scene. He shoots Kanarack and the last information Osborn could get from Kanarack was that he was murdering Osborn´s father for hire of Erwin Scholl. Osborn tells McVey about Scholl. Out of McVey´s researches arises that Osborn´s father invented a scalpel that can be used at degrees of absolute zero and that in the same year he was killed a few other inventors were killed, whose inventions were all about surgery at extremely high or low temperatures and all vanished. Because of that McVey and his investigation team have a suspicion that Scholl and his people might belong to an organization that´s working on surgery making it possible to combine deep-frozen body parts and to thaw it so the person is alive.

Time passes, and McVey finds out about Elton Lybarger and a ceremony that should be held in Berlin. During this in the main hall of the building Elton Lybarger is giving the speech. Suddenly all doors close and all people inside the main hall are gassed with cyanide gas. Right after the cyanide attack the building is set to fire and Osborn nearly perishes. After Osborn followed Von Holden, hte only remaining organization member, to Switzerland and is nearly killed McVey gives Osborn a VCR tape, on which Osborn finds a whole confession of Elton Lybarger´s physician. He confesses having experienced the surgery on Lybarger, because they were searching for a person, whose attributes and fingerprints were as much as the same as Adolf Hitler´s, and having helped the organization, who was trying to build a new third Reich, to raise Lybarger´s two “nephews”, the perfect Aryans, who were raised with him since they were young. According to Salettl one of them should be the new leader after having undergone an operation. Osborn can´t remember exactly what happened in Switzerland, but then the scene replays in his mind. He sees how Van holden falls into a crevasse and how he opens the package Von Holden had been carrying with him all the time, and it´s the deep-frozen head of Adolf Hitler...

I´m sorry that my article was too long before, but I´m not a native speaker and I´m only learning English in school, and so it was pretty difficult to keep it short because the book is pretty long.

Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by L b590172 (talk • contribs)

That's short enough not to dominate the article. Please go ahead and add it. -- Whpq (talk) 11:11, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

What {{for}}?

Please comment at Talk:Golden Hills Elementary School#Red links. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:40, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied in the article talk page -- Whpq (talk) 18:52, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for help

That helps. I'm surprised that they didn't catch that the other page was for "Golden Hill Elementary School." Oh well, easy mistake, I guess. Thanks for helping. They got on to you for removing the hatnote. You were just helping. I guess red links are o.k. though, if the pages will eventually be created. Again though, thanks. (JoeCool950 (talk) 20:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC))

Thanks

Takes for your kind message. Here is to hoping we can work together again some time in the future Gnevin (talk) 15:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Welcome!

Thanks for joining the forces for Good in the

Unreferenced BLP Rescue project! If we had an automated fancy bot welcome, this would be it! Happy referencing!--Milowent (talk

) 18:37, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll just pretend you are a bot and that I'll be okay?  :) BTW, I've knocked off two O's. -- Whpq (talk) 18:39, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clock Tower (film)

Okay... I closed it. But as my first ever closure, could you check that I did it correctly? And I learned that even though he said it was redirected, the nominator he had not actually performed a redirect... so I did that too. Could you check to make sure I did it correctly as well?[3][4] Thanks, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:14, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Julie Brown (athlete)

DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Courcelles (talk

You are awesome. I've been putting off that eyesore for weeks. I'd hug you if I could. No reply necessary. Millahnna (mouse)talk 19:16, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, that really was horrible. But I can't take credit for the succinct summary. I dredged that out from the article history, and just adjusted a couple of words. -- Whpq (talk) 19:25, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Re this DIFF, any particular reason why you deleted my iVote? ----moreno oso (talk) 13:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm sure it was inadvertent, and in fact the comment was restored before you re-added it. Probably the result of an edit conflict.  Frank  |  talk  13:10, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

My apologies. I assure you that it was not an intentional act. I'm not sure what happened. There was an edit conflict notice, and I thought I had dealt with it properly copying my !vote to the newer version. Apparently I messed up. Sorry. -- Whpq (talk) 13:26, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the improvements to Wikipedia:Unreferenced BLP Rescue, it looks quite nice!--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 16:31, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Indeed.. if I'd found a hurling trophy, I would have definitely opted for it first.  ;-) --j⚛e decker^talk 21:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

When I read your message here I honestly read "hoser" insead of "hosed". I was thinking, "Wow, Whpq sure hates his computer today". --Jezebel'sPonyo^shhh 19:20, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Take off, eh?! -- Whpq (talk) 19:22, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

No, you take off eh?! And holy carp, hoser actually has it's own Wiki article. I'm slightly amused and somewhat aghast at the same time. --Jezebel'sPonyo^shhh 19:24, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Nice catch! --Jezebel'sPonyo^shhh 19:18, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man-Faye (4th nomination). --Gwern (contribs) 11:13 4 August 2010 (GMT) 11:13, 4 August 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})

*Note: I am sending this to all participants of the Kebab House deletion discussion

Hello,

I recently opened up a policy change proposal regarding the notability requirements for restaurants here and I would like your input, be it in support or opposition. Thank you - Theornamentalist (talk) 00:39, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

1. Mohammad Siddiq Chakari - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Lisa Christiansen

I am requesting that you consider reviewing the above mentioned article and consider recommending that the article is kept, based on copyediting and established notability. I initially opposed the inclusion of this article on Wikipedia due to blatant promotional tone. The article is no longer written in a promotional tone and cannot be considered spam. The article was copy edited, but still lacked content establishing her notability.

After extensive work on the article, review of her books, and research of books and magazines that mention her, I realized that notability is established, based on the fact that a book has been written entirely about her.

A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject.

The book, Gi–Dee–Thlo–Ah–Ee, of the Blue People Clan, was written in 1974, independent of any involvement by Christiansen, published by the Cherokee Nation, with copies in the Library of Congress, which includes this book and noted in their catalog and listings. Gi–Dee–Thlo–Ah–Ee is Christiansen's native Cherokee name given at birth.

I am now recommending that this article be kept, due to established notability as the subject of a published book, reliable and independent of the subject. Christiansen was eight years old when this book was written. Her notability was established according to the Nation upon the death of her mother, since Christiansen was then the last surviving descendant of Sequoyah. I would like to invite you to review the article and consider recommending that the article is kept, based on corresponding criteria

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiCopter at 04:03, 27 August 2010 (UTC).

I looked at this one a few months back, and came to the same conclusion as yourself. With no first class games under his belt and no international caps, we must state at this time Chris Ball is not notable and should be deleted. Thanks FruitMonkey (talk) 16:26, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

It's all yours, I'm closing the debate as merge. PS: Thanks for offering to perform the merge! --j⚛e decker^talk 20:02, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

I've done the merge. Most of the material was already in the list article. I spent more time verifying that content was already present than actual merging. It was only 3 entries! -- Whpq (talk) 14:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, guys. The wikification drive has been bumped to October. You might have noticed already, however. I'm amazed how many people came on as soon as I sent out the invite. With a few more, we can easily meet our goal. Just remember. Concentrate your firepower on the 2008 articles, and you should have no problems. Great work! Also, if you have time, please also invite other users to participate. Thanks!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 21:04, 2 September 2010 (UTC).

yes, i am curious. are you employed by wikipedia? it seems that you and some of your chorts are very judgemental and dont have all of the facts regarding these subjects. i realize that maintaining wikipedia is a daunting task but it amazes me how much you guys think you know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.241.155.18 (talk) 00:21, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

present tense is not appropriate as Acharyas no longer exist in current world. The last of the Jain acharyas lived around 300 BC —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.171.222.5 (talk) 10:48, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Get ready. The October 2010 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive is about to begin. Prep your keyboards, as the drive aims to wikify over 2,000 articles this month. We're going to need all the firepower we can get, so please get your friends to join up as well. In case you didn't know, wikification is fairly simple: just add wiki markup, links, and similar ". Thanks for joining; we're looking forward to an exciting time this month! Regards, Mono (talk · contribs) and WikiCopter (talk · contribs )

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 05:33, 29 September 2010 (UTC).

I have recently noted that you have removed some unsuitable text from this biography. Could you please have a look at this piece of text about chrissie maher and see if it is suitable for a biography page

Chrissie Maher has not always been on the receiving end of favourable comment. The Daily Mail (4 November 1997) and the Manchester Evening News (3 November 1997) reported an Industrial Tribunal case between her company and a former employee, M J Nobbs, in which it was said that Maher had spread false rumours of an affair between Mr Nobbs (who was married) and another married company employee. The Industrial Tribunal found in Mr Nobbs' favour, and its chairwoman Miss Woolley was unusually forthright in her criticisms of Maher, whom she branded an "inconsistent, changeable and unreliable witness" who had lied repeatedly on oath. Miss Woolley said, "We find Mrs Maher was lying to us", and referred to "the actions of Mrs Maher in lying to the applicant...". Mrs Christine Nobbs, an infant-school teacher, told the Daily Mail of the 'hideous pain, anger and distress' the rumours had caused her and her husband. 'It might have broken others, but we have been married for 21 years and I know my husband.'

these allegations are unsourced and i do see that they are suitable for a biography page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinos155 (talk • contribs) 16:37, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

You may be referring to User:Macwhiz. I only made formatting cleanups. I did not alter or remove any of the biographical material. -- Whpq (talk) 16:41, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

I trust your judgement removing the wikify tag. Senior Editor II? The new user Markiewp has been on a frenzy the past month removing wikify tags, two thousand or so. I've been here since February and I don't consider myself qualified to make the call of which articles can lose the wikify tags. People work hard going through articles looking for which ones need wikifying. I don't suppose someone could review the many edits where he removed the tags - am I being wrong in this?

Maybe the instruction in wiki final check " Remove the {{wikify}} tag " should be modified. Slightsmile (talk) 17:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

I encourage you to be

WP:BOLD and remove the {{wikify}} tag yourself if you've done the work and feel that it is complete. If you are unsure, and would like a second opinion, you can drop a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikify

and have somebody review your work.

Specifically on James Todd (Canadian settler), I removed the tag because it seemed to have a reasonable number of links. Perhaps there may be a couple of more links that could be added, but all articles on Wikipedia are subject to improvement. As for reviewing user:Markiewp's work, I already see that another experienced editor has provided him with advice. Unless you think that there is something wrong with what Markiewp is doing, I don't see any need to review. I picked a coupe of articles at random and the removal of the wikification tag looked appropriate. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 17:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair enough, again - I trust your judgement on this issue and am ready to move on to bigger and better things. Just one final thing, what do you think of these - Iakovos Nafpliotis and Crow's Nest Natural Area Preserve ? Slightsmile (talk) 17:47, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Rather sloppy. In the case of Iakovos Nafpliotis, I'm not familiar with the subject matter, but the large number of red links introduced is probably not good. A red link is useful only if there should be an article about the subject. As for Crow's Nest Natural Area Preserve, it looks like the links were added without due care. For example, "hickories" should have been piped to "hickory". -- Whpq (talk) 18:04, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm assuming you looked at the article histories - Markiewp. I'm not trying to be judgemental about anyone, I just feel that the tags were put there for a reason. If you look at my contribs - I think I'm bold enough. But also have to remember that ultimately we're a team. I hope people don't remove tags as some kind of trophy. Slightsmile (talk) 18:16, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Yes I did check the article history and realize it was Markiewp who did the work. He has already had one editor contact him about his work. I don't want to dogpile on. I suggest you keep an eye on the work and if it continues to be slopppy, you can remind him to take more care with his edits. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 18:21, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm not an admin and I don't plan on watching this person - much. I might go through his earliest contribs from time to time and see if there's anything to fix. Other than that I think I'm done with this. Thanks for looking at this. Cheers Slightsmile (talk) 18:45, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

This is an automated message from

This was caught in the middle of a split operation. I am following all processes to ensure proper attribution per

WP:SPLIT. -- Whpq (talk

) 15:39, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Maybe we can save the article. I'm about to do more cutting.Naraht (talk) 15:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm not much bothered by the conflict of interest editting. Thta can be dealt with through editting, warnings, and if necessary, page protection. What this article lacks, and hasn't been addressed is signficant coverage in reliable sources. Passing mentions in newspapers doesn't cut it. -- Whpq (talk) 15:34, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Agreed. As I said in the AFD, this is true for just about all of the groups in the Category:Fraternities and sororities in the Philippines, this one just happened to get hit now. I have added 5 references. Note, in this case, I do have somewhat of a COI, I'm on the International Relations Committee for Alpha Phi Omega-USA (which means that unlike 99.99% of the Alpha Phi Omega-USA brothers, I know what Scouts Royale Brotherhood is). I hope though that my efforts on here keep a NPOV.Naraht (talk) 15:42, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello WHPQ,

Over a year ago I updated the wiki page for the Nevada Museum of Art. I am the Communications Director at the Museum and hoped to correct inaccurate information and add further information to the page. I did so and have since noticed that the user "whpq" - which I believe is you - has systematically deleted 90% of the information I added.

Can you please let me know why this has been done as part of the "wikify" process? I don't understand what action, additions, text, etc that we added was either incorrect or offensive?

I am new to the Wikipedia format but would appreciate your explanation so that we can fix and update our page ASAP and properly. Our goal is to share information about the Museum with the wiki world.

Kind regards, Rachel at the Nevada Museum of Art Rmart123 (talk) 21:13, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

The version prior to my edits was promotional in nature. Wikpedia is an encyclopedia, not a web hosting service for the museum. Admission prices, hours operation, and all that other stuff is more appropriate for the museum web site which is provided as an external link. -- Whpq (talk) 21:17, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi there - I understand completely now...I was under the impression that the more information the better but I do see now what you mean by using it as a hosting service of which we have no intention of doing - apologies :) I have looked at other examples of museums on Wikipedia and notice that they have history, overview, collections sections...i added information like that to our page for the wiki community but it was also deleted. How can we update the information without seeming to be "selling" the museum - we are interested in only educating. Your help is GREATLY appreciated! We would love to have information as robust as say "the Metropolitan Museum" page, but are not sure how to go about it. Many Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmart123 (talk • contribs) 23:01, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi again - I just made some additions and updates using references - is that correct usage? and appropriate content to add? Thanks! Rmart123 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:12, 20 October 2010 (UTC).

Dear friend,Could you please see this Talk:Premakeerthi de Alwis and please contribute your suggestion about his murder case. I am trying to write new issue about Hadson Samarasinghe Where mention on book of ‘’Premakeethini’’by nirmala de alwis. But it is removing. Please tell your opinions.--Wipeouting (talk) 04:39, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Dear friend One of my articleLionel Wendt is nominated to copy right violations. I re wrote few times, but it is not work. I really appreciate if you can assist me to protect this article.--Wipeouting (talk) 04:42, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

A couple of very experienced editors with a lot of experience has already identified that the material is in violation of copyright. That is a core policy. There is nothing to protect as the material you have added is unacceptable. -- Whpq (talk) 13:18, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

{{unblock-auto|1=24.114.255.99|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Suckitpls". The reason given for Suckitpls's block is: " Stop x nuvola.svg Your account has been blocked indefinitely because its username is a blatant violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ".|3=MuZemike|4=2140086}}

I have contacted the blocking admin. --

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock #2140086 lifted or expired. Request handled by: –MuZemike Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

I just did a basic {{