User talk:Willsteve2000

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

Draft:Curtis and Jones Company Shoe Factory. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:55, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Curtis and Jones Company Shoe Factory, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:37, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DistrictBuilder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DistrictBuilder (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

—

Erie County, Ohio

added a link pointing to Erie County

Erie County, Pennsylvania

added a link pointing to Erie County

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erie County, Ohio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erie County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright me old mucker :)

I proposed an AFD nomination on

@

WP:AFDHOWTO, which will do a deletion nomination (I think what happened to the George Bush article is a deletion proposal instead of a nomination). Basically, by adding "{{subst:afd1}}" at the top of the article and saving, it'll create a link where it says "deletion discussion page" that will allow you to nominate the article, open the discussion, and add your reason into it. The instructions are a bit complex, but not too hard to follow. Hope this helps! - Willsteve2000 (talk) 21:13, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Tyvm - did I do it right? I can't tell. It has the same page formatting but the link on the template is clickable but red. And it's got code at bottom Stephanie921 (talk) 21:27, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:AFDHOWTO

).

Also, as mentioned by 331dot in the revision history for the page, a merge proposal might be better than a deletion nomination. When I did the

Death and funeral of Donald Dewar. Willsteve2000 (talk) 21:37, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Awesome, ty. Personally I think the content on the Bush funeral is substantive enough to warrant an entire article. I meant anything that can be in the article should ideally go in the main one, although I'm not arguing for a merge. I just think an entire article is repetitive and not notable. Feel free to suggest thoughts on page if u disagree Stephanie921 (talk) 21:49, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've done it now btw!! Tysm :D Feel free to discuss on page Stephanie921 (talk) 23:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! I'm currently leaning towards keep on that particular article, just because of how substantive the article is, but will comment if I have anything to add. - Willsteve2000 (talk) 23:19, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome :D I'm extremely proud of myself and I couldn't have done it without you Stephanie921 (talk) 23:27, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Death of Mikhail Gorbachev deletion 2A00:1FA0:46C9:1807:0:6B:63FD:5F01 (talk) 09:35, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:CLOSEAFD). Willsteve2000 (talk) 15:24, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:57, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Howdy. Concerning the notes, just wanted to point out. Not every post-20th amendment Congress began on January 3. But we still use January 3, as the starting date for terms. After all, it would kinda look strange showing (for example) that Pelosi ceased to be a representative on January 3, 2023 & then became a representative 'again' on January 7, 2023. GoodDay (talk) 07:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay Hello there! While I agree that January 3rd should remain the starting date listed for their terms due to the 20th Amendment, I believe it would be appropriate to add a note for the new members of the House in this 118th Congress to note that they were sworn in at a later date. I am not suggesting or advocating for changing the starting date, or changing anything on the articles for re-elected members who have served in previous sessions of Congress, but rather just a small note on the articles of the new house members to indicate that the date they were first sworn in is different to the date they started the position, as they were still technically considered members-elect until they were sworn in. While including such a note has not not been done for members of other sessions of Congress, this is also the first post-20th Amendment Congress in which the election of a Speaker delayed the swearing in of new members. - Willsteve2000 (talk) 08:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just pointing out, starting dates/swearing in date being different is very common in the history of the US House & Senate, since 1789. Indeed before the 20th amendment, Congressional (House & Senate) terms began on March 4, but members didn't get sworn in until nine months later, in December. GoodDay (talk) 08:15, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Willsteve2000. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:41, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]