User talk:Wolvesfan77

Hello, Wolvesfan77, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Zane Maloney did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  14 novembre (talk) 12:59, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry i don't know who to source so i just have someone else do it for me Wolvesfan77 (talk) 13:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn at

biographies of living people. Cerebral726 (talk) 17:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi Wolvesfan77! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 2023 Las Vegas Grand Prix several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:2023 Las Vegas Grand Prix, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Cerebral726 (talk) 17:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't edit warring. the rules state i can't edit more then 3 times a day. I edited once yesterday. That isn't edit warring Wolvesfan77 (talk) 17:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The

WP:BRD as a guide. Cerebral726 (talk) 17:53, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

I not trying to edit war. I just can't stand people who edit pages without correct grammer. and i haven't touched that page since yesterday Wolvesfan77 (talk) 18:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Zane Maloney. Thank you. Cerebral726 (talk) 17:55, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do you refrence articles. I don't know how to do that Wolvesfan77 (talk) 18:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

biographies of living persons. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 18:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

If i send you the source name will you add it please Wolvesfan77 (talk) 18:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i am currently adding the sources and redoing what i edited. Please check if i did it right and tell me Wolvesfan77 (talk) 22:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:RadiationRaptor. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 23:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that guy was really getting on my nerves Wolvesfan77 (talk) 23:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not an excuse. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 23:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wolvesfan77!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 18:03, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jak Crawford, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The relevant section is #Problematic user. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 23:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Explain what the problem is Wolvesfan77 (talk) 23:08, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Make your case at ANI. I couldn't care less about the situation, I just happened upon it. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 23:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it releated to this page Wolvesfan77 (talk) 23:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's related to 2023–24 EFL Championship. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 23:15, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh proberly that annoying guy make false edits repeatedly. Wolvesfan77 (talk) 23:17, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it has nothing to do with me so that is good Wolvesfan77 (talk) 23:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you were violating

the three-revert rule, so yes, this also involves you. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 23:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Thomas Tuchel, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok boomer Wolvesfan77 (talk) 17:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wolvesfan77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

How and when was i making disruptive edits.Wolvesfan77 (talk) 18:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You persistently add unsourced information after being warned not to and given advice about learning to source information. You have edit warred. Good block. 331dot (talk) 18:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wolvesfan77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i wasn't doing any disruptive edits. Wolvesfan77 (talk) 18:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is clearly not the case. Please review

WP:GAB prior to making another appeal. Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wolvesfan77 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I wasn't trying to deliberately disrupte. i was trying to find a source for that page. I wouldn't deliberatly disrupte. unblock me please i wasn't trying to disrupte on purposeWolvesfan77 (talk) 18:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on your absolutely abhorrent behaviour below, good block and you are done with talk page access here. Yamla (talk) 19:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.