User talk:Wugapodes/Archive 24

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 20

←

Archive 22

Archive 23

Archive 24

Archive 25

Archive 26

→

Archive 30

Hi, I'm a bit lost. I've been working on this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_mining_in_the_Bancroft_area and someone recently pointed out that I rely too heavily on quotes and the tag directed me to Wikisource, someone there suggested I use Commons and so I did so, having just uploaded the document that I quote too much there (it's a Canadian government publication, in the public domain, I verified). I just don't know what it the next step to satisfy the guidance here, is it to share an image of the page I quote, rather than quote? For what it's worth, the actual quote is just a letter that some guy wrote and therefore is absolutely not copyright, alone or as part of this document.

Thanks in advance, CT55555 (talk) 01:00, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi CT55555, good questions, and I'm glad you're learning about our other projects as well! The goal of Wikipedia is largely to summarize what sources say rather than quote them directly or extensively. In general, it's better for you to write information in your own words and cite the source that backs up the claim. An important thing to note is that letters can be subject to copyright. I'm unfamiliar with Canadian copyright law, but if it's similar to US law, we assume copyright on the letter exists unless it was produced by a government official as part of their work duties. If you spend some time summarizing the quotes into original writing though, I think the article will be much improved. Let me know if you need other help! — Wug·a·po·des​ 22:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Wugapodes,
I sincerely hope your holiday season goes well this year especially with what we went through last year. I'm optimistic that 2022 will be a better year for all of us: both in real life and on Wikipedia. Wishing you the best from, Interstellarity (talk) 19:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

@Interstellarity: And the best to you too! I'm hopeful as well, and wanted to share this poem excerpt with you in that spirit. Happy holiday! — Wug·a·po·des​ 22:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

What future bliss, He gives not thee to know,
But gives that hope to be thy blessing now.
Hope springs eternal in the human breast

— Alexander Pope (1891), Essay on Man

I've just seen a reply you made to me at AN. The personalised comment I'm glad you spend the holiday season pouring over your watchlist is unbecoming. You have no idea what holidays I do and do not celebrate. Please don't make such comments towards me in the future. — Bilorv (talk) 09:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

@Bilorv: Thank you for bringing this up with me, and I'm sorry that I did not appreciate how offensive it would come off. I will be more considerate in the future. For what it's worth, I am sincerely glad that you get to spend this season as you like, whatever your seasonal traditions, and in my head I imagined a more cordial tone. Reading it back now though, I can see how it reads as anything but cordial, and I'm sorry that I did not realize that sooner. Would you like me to revise the comment by striking or removing it? I know that editing it could paradoxically bring more attention which you may not want, and I'd rather not make things worse, so if you have a preference let me know. — Wug·a·po·des​ 20:52, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the polite reply. :) The acknowledgement is enough and I don't desire the comment to be struck/removed. — Bilorv (talk) 21:12, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Kudos to both for the nondrama and AGF. —valereee (talk) 21:28, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at

. | Sent at 01:30, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Help --AlanzPhone79 (talk) 13:15, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at

. | Sent at 19:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

RFA 2021 Completed

01:47, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Is there some way

) 17:17, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

@

Bison X: Unlikely. The menu is created after the wikitext is parsed, so including a template like that would be difficult. It's a good idea though, and if I had more time one of my longer term goals would be figuring out some kind of preview or hover text that gives information on how the templates are supposed to be used. For now it seems the best options are learning the templates or trial-and-error. — Wug·a·po·des

​ 06:58, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

hi there!

Hey, Wugapodes! re: moving the SOHA, would WugBot have been updated to support that? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 02:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi theleekycauldron, ArbCom results hit right when I was planning on making the edits so between the committee transition and winter holidays this unfortunately has gotten delayed. WugBot currently uses the SOHA as its termination condition, so moving the section requires reworking its internal logic. Barring any more surprises, I should be able to program and test it next weekend. — Wug·a·po·des​ 06:43, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

sounds good—thanks so much! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 07:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here .
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

A token of thanks Hi Wugapodes! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

	Greetings, Wugapodes. You are receiving this notification because the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: Sdrqaz
Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow. To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

) 00:00, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

Guideline and policy news

• Following consensus at the
  2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed
  from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.

• Additionally, consensus for
  advanced permissions
  .

Arbitration

• Following the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Cabayi, Donald Albury, Enterprisey, Izno, Opabinia regalis, Worm That Turned, Wugapodes.

Miscellaneous

• The functionaries email list (functionaries-enlists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.

---

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Nice. —valereee (talk) 22:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

	Greetings, Wugapodes. You are receiving this notification because the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: S Marshall
Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow. To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

) 00:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

January songs

in friendship

Happy new year! - Today I show yesterday's snow (if you click on "songs") and today's music in memory of Jerome Kohl, a friend --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:14, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

01:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

I've given some more thought to User_talk:Wugapodes/Archive_23#Paid_voting_/_commenting_plan. I think the easiest things to implement would be:

• 1. A partnership between the WMF and one or more freelancing sites. The freelancing site would regulate WMF rules on the freelancers and employers. In return, they would get a page on wikipedia proper. The sole purpose of the project would be paid translation of content from one language encyclopedia to another. The freelancing website would ban other types of employment related to wikipedia. Such a program would hopefully lure paid commenters/voters to the partner freelancing site due to its larger volume of work. This program might be controversial for enwiki, so maybe it could be started first on another language encyclopedia. I imagine many of the African and Asian language wikipedias would readily accept such a program. Then if it seems to work for them, enwiki can deploy a similar system.

• 2. Instead of #1, a barter system on the reward board, where hours of translation can be bartered between languages. No token system would be used, rather it would be something like, "One hour of English to Spanish in return for one hour of Spanish to English". Offers could be for new translation work, for cleaning up machine translates, or proofing translations done with limited skill. A section of the reward board could be devoted to classified ads for barter. Syntax tutoring in exchange for translating would also be allowed.

• 3. This would be proposal #2, but allowing either live chat or skype for people using the program. Synchronous communication lowers the difficulty barrier when working with google translate-dependent discussions.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 02:57, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

@Epiphyllumlover: These are interesting ideas, and I'm glad you've given more thought to them. For #1 I would recommend reaching out to someone on the Community Resources team as well as some smaller wikis to find out what communities might be interested in this kind of project. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:37, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

I suppose the community resources personnel would be able to help with reaching out to smaller wikis to gauge interest.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 01:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

I am signing up to update a posting on Charles J. Connick, a stained glass artist, who's windows are installed in our church in Winthrop, MA. Our installation is missing from the article. --Processdcp (talk) 00:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi @

our policy on conflicts of interest. Let me know if you have other questions, and happy editing! — Wug·a·po·des

​ 01:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

why I can not save Wikipedia in my home page?! --Shahin jan Afghan (talk) 16:13, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Wugapodes, WugBot last ran on the DYK Nominations and Approved pages at 11:00 UTC. There's at least one nomination that has been ticked since then, and it was before noon UTC, so the bot's been down for a while. I hope you can get this fixed soon. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:28, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: I just ran it manually and it worked. Looking in the error logs, I think something might have gone wrong with the pywikibot backend. I'll keep an eye on it to try and figure out what's going on. — Wug·a·po·des​ 02:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Can you please also do a manual run of the GAN Report? It didn't run 90 minutes ago at 01:00 UTC. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:30, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

19:54, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

cheese balls are das besta --7hamiltox (talk) 16:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at

. | Sent at 11:30, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

21:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

	The Admin's Barnstar
	For closing the RFC on the structure of Mass Killings Under Communist Regimes. (In particular, for writing a two-part explanation of the close that both was consistent with policies and guidelines and summarized what the editors said.) Robert McClenon (talk) 14:05, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Robert McClenon, happy to help. I've been watching the page since you requested more eyes a few months ago, and your dispute resolution has been impressive. Having read the RfC, I'm hopeful about a path forward, and I don't think that would have happened without your work. Let me know if there's any way I can help out in the future. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:54, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Wugapodes. The category Women in television should be a parent of Women television journalists. In an attempt to do this, I added Women in television in the category section of the Women television journalists. Apparently I have done this wrong because nothing appears in Women in television as a subcategory. Could you please inform me the proper procudure in doing this as I can not find any Wiki help pages informing me on how to do this. --MrMeAndMrMe_{Contributions} 22:44, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

@

purging the page. Try those out and if let me know if something still looks wrong. — Wug·a·po·des

​ 01:39, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

@Wugapodes: Thank you! MrMeAndMrMe_{Contributions} 12:50, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

	Mentor's Barnstar
	Thank you for answering my question, even though it is a minor one. MrMeAndMrMeContributions 12:54, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

In a process that began last year with

(DS) in order to improve it. A larger package of reforms is slated for sometime this year. From the work done so far, it became clear a number of areas may no longer need DS or that some DS areas may be overly broad.

The topics proposed for revocation are:

• Senkaku islands
• Waldorf education
• Ancient Egyptian race controversy
• Scientology
• Landmark worldwide

The topics proposed for a rewording of what is covered under DS are:

• India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan
• Armenia/Azerbaijan

Additionally any Article probation topics not already revoked are proposed for revocation.

Community feedback is invited and welcome at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions. --Barkeep49 (talk) 16:59, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

In a process that began last year with

(DS) in order to improve it. A larger package of reforms is slated for sometime this year. From the work done so far, it became clear a number of areas may no longer need DS or that some DS areas may be overly broad.

The topics proposed for revocation are:

• Senkaku islands
• Waldorf education
• Ancient Egyptian race controversy
• Scientology
• Landmark worldwide

The topics proposed for a rewording of what is covered under DS are:

• India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan
• Armenia/Azerbaijan

Additionally any Article probation topics not already revoked are proposed for revocation.

Community feedback is invited and welcome at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions. --Barkeep49 (talk) 04:36, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at

. | Sent at 16:30, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

17:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)