User talk:Xanchester/1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Xanchester. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Hongkongresident, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizardif you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
{{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! cab (call) 07:00, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Faboost and Faboost wiki
Why is my Faboost Wiki up to be deleted please tell me so i can sort it out and stop what it is???
Thank you Arianinja —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arianinja (talk • contribs) 21:27, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Rong Qiqi / List of Chinese military text
Hi Hongkongresident, nice work on these new articles - well done! I have a couple of comments though:
- Rong Qiqi - I made some minor edits after I picked up the link at Did You Know? I'm not sure people will find it interesting enough for acceptance (hundreds of people probably met or claimes to have met Confucius). Don't be discouraged if it doesn't get through!
- WP:Manual of Style (layout)to see what I mean).
All the best Philg88 (talk) 03:21, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Rollback and reviewer granted
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Wikipedia_Rollback.svg/80px-Wikipedia_Rollback.svg.png)
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting
- I have also given you reviewer rights; please see ]
Adoption request
Hello there, Xanchester! I'm
- Click here to view the list of adopters
Once again, welcome to Wikipedia! Netalarmtalk 23:08, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Template:Confucian texts
Hi, this template is a nice addition to various articles but you should remove the Chinese characters following linked articles according to
Bite Me (book) Deletion
In your keep message for Bite Me, you comment that the book was writen by "two notable authors." You might want to correct that since it was only written by Moore.Shsilver (talk) 12:25, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Whoops, typo, has been fixed now. Thanks for notifying me. :)--talk) 19:06, 21 October 2010 (UTC)]
GPS
No, my edit at GPS was not vandalism.
If you had bothered to actually look at Error analysis for the Global Positioning System, you might have noticed that the entire deleted section also resides there. The GPS article is much longer than the guidelines recommend - that's why you get the "This page is 131 kilobytes long. It may be appropriate to split this article into smaller, more specific articles. See Wikipedia:Article size." notice when you edit it.
There's also a thing called an "Edit Summary" - if you had actually read my edit summary, or the my edit summary on the edit erroneously reverted by"ClueBot" this would have been obvious.
Next time you decide to make a vandalism accusation, at least have the courtesy to actually look at the work first. The GPS article will never get any smaller if we split it into smaller, more specific articles, but never delete the split material from the parent article.
Remembering why I closed my Wikipedia account...129.61.46.60 (talk) 13:10, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Apologies, that was an honest mistake, done in talk) 19:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)]
MoS issues vs. content issues
This is admittedly a silly issue to take up space in the
We both know this is a pretty nitpicky issue. But the reason I am bringing it up is, to be perfectly frank, I think it's a little unfair to try and pass off an article with serious content issue as "just MoS concerns". If I thought the article only had MoS concerns, I would not have nominated it for AfD; I have been here long enough to be familiar with
- I'm sorry about the whole silly argument, but you have to clarify what you mean by content issues. From what I've gleaned so far, your concerns seems to deal with Laozi speak 05:32, 24 October 2010 (UTC)]
DYK nomination of List of Chinese military texts
Hello, your nomination of List of Chinese military texts at DYK was reviewed and comments provided. --NortyNort (Holla) 08:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Revision history of Eyes (cheese)
The consensus was clearly to merge, six out of 12 people suggested it, even a person who wanted to keep it suggested it could be merged with cheese ripening if such article existed and it was created. Michał Rosa (talk) 09:20, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- I understand, I was one of the editors in favor of the merge. But the consensus, as determined by the admin, was to keep it separate.--Laozi speak 10:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC)]
Binahian
I have declined your two speedies - though the tone is quite inappropriate, it isn't really an advertisement, and as for copyright we don't have any source and I suspect the poems are OR rather than copied from elsewhere. I can understand your wish to get rid of it asap, but let the AfD take care of it. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:12, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Rong Qiqi
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Talkback
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
DYK nomination of Cheese ripening
Hello, your nomination of Cheese ripening at DYK was reviewed and comments provided. --NortyNort (Holla) 10:41, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
DYK for List of Chinese military texts
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Jeopardy! Tenth Anniversary Tournament
Maybe I was not clear enough. I provided to you the example merge edit summary Merge content from [[Jeopardy! Tenth Anniversary Tournament]]
but I did not specifically say this: the name should contain a link to the merge-from article. This is the proper form for copyright attribution when merging content. The bracketing around the title "[[ ]]" (which make it a link when saved) was not meant to be optional. Using a
- Great. Perfect merge. The issue is simply that people must be able to follow content back to its copyright holders, here, the users who wrote it, and a link provides better access which is why this is the form stated under Actions which must be performed for both merger types. Thanks!--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:34, 28 October 2010 (UTC)]
Barnstar
![]() |
The Article Rescue Barnstar | |
For rescuing Tamil Isai Sangam from deletion, by re-writing, referencing and cleaning up - and done to a high standard - I hereby award you this barnstar! Acather96 (talk) 14:35, 30 October 2010 (UTC) |
DYK nomination of Lai Pak-Hoi
Image
Hello ! The image of Liu Xiabo is too big. It should be reduced (150px). Thanks ! Thatdumisdum (talk) 19:24, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Religion in San Marino
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c8/Ambox_notice.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
the guide to writing your first article.to help you create articles.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page,
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}}
to the top of
Speedy delete tags
Per our
- Not a problem - it was obviously unintentional and just something you were unaware of. Personally I'm unsure whether the A10 tag should have remained because now as it stands, it could get lost and never expanded. That said if the tag had remained it would likely have got deleted by now as not being improved enough. I believe that despite much discussion there has never been a consensus for speedy tags that only result in articles being deleted after x amount of time which leaves us with the choice of either tagging articles being worked on or possibly having them lost in the system while often being in a horrible state, neither of which is idea. It may be best, in future, to work on new articles in your user space and then move them into article space when at a more advanced stage. Dpmuk (talk) 00:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Cheese ripening
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The Signpost: 1 November 2010
- In the news: Airplane construction with Wikipedia, lessons from the strategy project, logic over rhetoric
- WikiProject report: Scoring with WikiProject Ice Hockey
- Features and admins: Good-lookin' slugs and snails
- Arbitration report: Arb resignation during plagiarism discussion; election RfC closing in 2 days
- Technology report: Foundation office switches to closed source, secure browsing, brief news
DYK for Cyberwarfare in the People's Republic of China
DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |