User talk:Xeno/Archive 27
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 |
Proposal to extend the editing restrictions placed on User:Communicat
Hello, I have proposed that ArbCom extend the editing restrictions which it placed on
- Noted - I will take a look when I have time. Generally all arbitrators watch the relevant venues, so there is typically no need to ping us individually - though I understand the desire to try and prod us along... –xenotalk 18:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
I wanted to drop you a note that I'm giving Bubblespop201 a second chance to edit. You blocked the editor for an egregious BLP violation, which was entirely justified, but the editor has given an unambiguous acknowledgement that what they did was wrong and that they will try to make useful contributions. I've warned the editor that this is a last chance and that any further disruption would likely lead to a second block that will probably not be overturned. I've put the editor's page on my watchlist and will try to keep an eye on them. -- Atama頭 17:11, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Generally I am sympathetic to granting second chances, though I might suggest in future to ask them to put their edit button where their mouth is and engage the {{2nd chance}} procedure (especially when their first edit is so blatantly inappropriate). Let's hope that your faith in this editor has not been misplaced. –xenotalk 18:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
How can we correct a wrong title?
Hello, I am the elder daughter of Kanġi Oĥanko. Now I have time to give you details about my dad (via e-mail only, for private reasons), if you care. He can't do it himself.
For the moment, can you tell me how we can correct a wrong transliteration in a title. There are very few words in Ukrainian which use the [g] sound (like in "get"). The letter
--Air Miss (talk) 21:59, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- Considering that the University itself uses "Lugansk" at http://lsmu.edu.ua/eng/, I don't think we need to need to change anything. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:04, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- Many official or non-official websites still use Kiev (like Wikipedia, in the title, for example, instead of Kyïw or Kyïv or a minimal Kyiv, even if the Ukrainian constitution says Ukrainian is the only official language in Ukraine. There are many, many examples like that in the Wikipedias, for various reasons. The main reason is that Ukrainians fear that correct tags would mislead the user or not found by those who don't speak Ukrainian.
- Then, many official websites are in Russian (which violates laws and the constitution...) and then г becomes g, while the [[[Luhansk Oblast|Luhans‘ka's website]]] for example has only Ukrainian and the г is an h. How do you sort this out? Is it only the English-, German- and French-speaking people to decide what are the Ukrainian, Byelorussian (unless you speak the language and read “Беларусь” correctly as /bɛləˈruːsʲ/, why this German, stupid Belarus), Ruthenian languages and all others should be? Or do the native speakers can decide? Is it mine to decide what English should be? --Air Miss (talk) 23:05, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Air Miss. Please do email me at xenowiki (at) gmail (dot) com (or click here) with news of Kanġi Oĥanko. As regards articles titles for foreign-language subjects, typically it would be the most common English spelling that is used. See Wikipedia:Article titles#Foreign names and anglicization and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) for more information on this topic. –xenotalk 23:09, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- Many official or non-official websites still use Kiev (like
Hi!
![]() |
Just checkin' in |
Just wanted to pop in and say hi and share some cuteness via WikiLove. :) (Hamster! Eating! Awww! He would make a better box if he were facing the other way, but, oh, well...I'm not obsessive enough to flip 'im) Thanks for all you do. :) Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:41, 4 July 2011 (UTC) |
- Thanks for the hamster. I will get him to work in the server farms right away ;p –xenotalk 12:50, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
AUSC stats
Hi,
my thoughts were to keep all editors who held community/ArbCom appointed CU rights during the last six months (plus Jimbo) in the AUSC stats. You're subtle nudges didn't go unnoticed, but if my metric isn't the most useful one for AUSC you'll have to be a bit more explicit. :) Do you want me to remove everyone who does not hold the bit at the end of the month? Or is it maybe enough to just make that part explicit, i.e. with a gray font color? Do you want non-ArbCom AUSC members highlighted as well?
Cheers, Amalthea 20:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- OH! I didn't see you re-added them, I thought maybe I had overlooked them when I made the edits last month. I don't think there's any kind of hard-and-fast system we have nailed down there... My main use for that page is in relation to Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 7#Advanced permissions and inactivity. If you think it makes more sense to keep them on to explicitly show the absence of activity, then I think it is better to have zeros (0) rather than blank spaces. Blank spaces should be used for people who didn't hold the bit that month. And maybe a slightly different grey for non-arb AUSC holders and months where the bit is absent. –xenotalk 20:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't think too much about it, was just the way I set it up – and I didn't mind your edit at all, and of course didn't mean to make you revert it. Differentiating between months without bit and without checks makes sense (and is how Avi always held it, not that I think about it). I'll make some tweaks till the end of the month. Cheers, Amalthea 21:22, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Well, it does make sense to show zeros for months with no activity even for users who have relinquished the privs since (zeros for the months they held it, blanks for the months they are waiting to roll off the report). It just made it easier for me to visualize when they were removed =) But colouration and use of zeros vs. blanks will do that just as well. Thanks for your efforts on this. Maybe you can be coerced into updating 22:20, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't think too much about it, was just the way I set it up – and I didn't mind your edit at all, and of course didn't mean to make you revert it. Differentiating between months without bit and without checks makes sense (and is how Avi always held it, not that I think about it). I'll make some tweaks till the end of the month. Cheers, Amalthea 21:22, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
PGP public key
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) mQENBE4SbHgBCADJnTb22Vn0QHkTOUqi3m7YjgMtZmHLjmq+7mNFYjUTGY7+JOOF NxAfv8ZuvJjt17q5eFml6m8baKxZdZSe08B1BhVvL4FVAzNpLsN6Nqg2dOKYpRRO qg1fN/7/9tZpit5YqU3Y79r71qLW05F1nl+4H+6auk2RRMNmX7966lfZ/7zWLqj3 SN/U8Ei6r+CGtIIcHhukZyC6pXF3IHf99hU0a0GMyi59ZNJ5ucI3YjX99FZZBzy/ +nHsZGSnpl5bvUAMYLKLaNGYo48FgMs+a52tFple0QASu7YwOkRYlsBS+BLdV2nR gNDZc05CDjz/mhixgtTYWxOEp2EvtQlpQgENABEBAAG0JXhlbm9jaWRpYyAoeGVu bykgPHhlbm93aWtpQGdtYWlsLmNvbT6JATgEEwECACIFAk4SbHgCGy8GCwkIBwMC BhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEMuZt11QFloPQbkH/jt9XoAhuqLUN57O8QQc Sn2d1mPVZNioxOGx/MY4XDDX1/Z8SFjCYDfTMDlQhqaY7E0l+8NRF+gBHIVtREg/ bhb3Sgk+mBmjPUNSE7CRYV+CweiuZYb8zQ9kl9K9qWpwljkuGYWD1sIsJNzSb3aR nuI/A1CWG0xuU7OsooT0d0fx/JjulPDGCUQW/rRssnAJU99HbvB/ohn+5i+wLJvK Px/baUeFp9dEJLlUigjk2sGDmVka46RzsTuJECeuN8nBx8Hs3w52D4EIMDlpIwfT gqjm5RMDFFOPSFuCQ9gMSfg7czGTv1/TNDFa3aE97jDN74aU04q4yB5EvCr+VP2K 3dI= =rkP7 -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
With thanks to Tim Starling for the Gpg4win tutorial. –xenotalk 01:49, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- Why has it taken so long for even this basic level of security to be implemented? I was routinely using PGP on sensitive projects more than 20 years ago. Fatuorum03:32, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- I have an aversion to word salads so I'll just say yes, it would. Fatuorum03:54, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- I have an aversion to word salads so I'll just say yes, it would.
- I haven't been privy to the investigations into the attack, so this is all just hypothetical: if the attacker obtained entry via a rootkit, wouldn't they be able to defeat PGP by keystroke logging the victim's passphrase? –xenotalk 03:59, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- Entry to what? That remains the unanswered issue here. Fatuorum04:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- Entry to what? That remains the unanswered issue here.
- There's no "of course" about it, and please don't try to treat me like an idiot. The initial claim was that Iridescent's email account had been compromised. So what exactly was this compromised system if it wasn't Iridescent's email account? Did someone just randomly guess a password to the ArbCom email list? Do you really believe that we're all fools? Fatuorum04:19, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- There's no "of course" about it, and please don't try to treat me like an idiot. The initial claim was that Iridescent's email account had been compromised. So what exactly was this compromised system if it wasn't Iridescent's email account? Did someone just randomly guess a password to the ArbCom email list? Do you really believe that we're all fools?
- I never made that specific claim (though I did refer back to it, as I personally had no reason to doubt it at the time). It is my understanding that the evidence that lead Coren to that conclusion has since been re-examined and no longer appears to be genuine (Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Archive 8#Enquiries are continuing).
- The simple truth is: I don't have the answers you're looking for, and I really was speaking hypothetically and speculatively above - I'm not on the inside track of these investigations.
- I'm off for the night. –xenotalk 04:28, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
change user name
Would I be correct to assume that this would keep me from being able to usurp the name "Ched"? .. ty —
- Borderline - I'd lean towards granting it because it looks like most of the edits were either reverted or very slight copy edits. –xenotalk 14:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
- OK ... thank you Xeno. Let me think on it for a day or two. I don't want to make a decision on the spur of the moment. — ?14:35, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
- OK ... thank you Xeno. Let me think on it for a day or two. I don't want to make a decision on the spur of the moment. —
Something to enjoy while you work
![]() |
Welcome back! I hope all is well and things are back to some semblance of normality for you. If you don't drink alcohol, pretend its alcohol free :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 17:34, 6 July 2011 (UTC) |
- Oh, I'll let you know if things are back to normality 17:42, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Question
How do you get user rights?The computer rocks! (talk) 17:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
- Most you can request at WP:RFB. (And some of the higher-order privileges require special requests or applications.) –xenotalk17:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
- If I want a bot-account flagged (policy-compliant, purely userspace ATM), where do I go then? :) Amalthea 01:02, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- What for? Prodego talk 01:04, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Mainly nominornewtalk in the near future. Amalthea 01:08, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Mmm, then you would need the actual bot right. 01:16, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Ah? BOTPOL isn't actually clear on that. It says userspace bot tasks don't actually require approval (as long as they behave), and that accounts are bot-flagged upon request by a BAG person. BRFA isn't necessarily a part of it, I think, and a bot flag has some inherent features as well (apihighlimits, and having the edits properly marked in RC and watchlists) so that I don't think it should be. Amalthea 13:09, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Is it just your own userspace? –xenotalk 13:11, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Ah? BOTPOL isn't actually clear on that. It says userspace bot tasks don't actually require approval (as long as they behave), and that accounts are bot-flagged upon request by a BAG person. BRFA isn't necessarily a part of it, I think, and a bot flag has some inherent features as well (apihighlimits, and having the edits properly marked in RC and watchlists) so that I don't think it should be. Amalthea 13:09, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Mmm, then you would need the actual bot right. 01:16, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- Mainly nominornewtalk in the near future. Amalthea 01:08, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- What for? Prodego talk 01:04, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- If I want a bot-account flagged (policy-compliant, purely userspace ATM), where do I go then? :) Amalthea 01:02, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2011
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
|
|
Content
|
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
- talk
- Cleanup – talk
- Peer review – talk
- Reference library – talk
- Newsletter – talk
- talk
Usurpation
Thanks a lot! Pierrot de Lioncourt カバー!!!カバー!!! 14:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Recent usurpation request
Hi there!
You have recently been dealing with a usurpation request from me, hoping to take over the user name SteveH. I thought I had set this up recently but had been unable to log in due to what I was told at the time was a system bug. I began to get suspicious when the progress report said that SteveH has made several edits, as I knew I couldn't have made them. I was thus not too surprised when you found out that SteveH had been created in 2002, rather than by me recently.
This does raise a troubling point, however. When attempting to set up the account the message I got definitely said "account created" not "account already exists". Might it therefore be possible that there is something else amiss with the account-creation process? Or maybe I was just unlucky due to an unfortunate coincidence of circumstances. Either way, at least I now know what has been going on! Seems a "rename" request is my next port of call.
Best regards,
Steve Holmes
- It is possible that this has to do with the transition from the "old" Wikipedia to the "new" Wikipedia - perhaps the account never was "created" in the new Wikipedia but the edits were still attributed to it - I'm not entirely sure. Even if this is the case, we would need to re-attribute those edits elsewhere if you are going to take on the name. Choose a different name, edit with it for 3 months, and feel free to request again at that time. Also please do take note of the 14:50, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- This problem has nothing to do with the transition between Wikipedia databases, which occurred in January 2002. It sounds like a bug in the account creation software ... are you sure you didn't make a typo or something? It'd probably be best to ask Tim or Brion or someone about it. Graham87 17:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the further comments. I'm not that concerned about grabbing SteveH particularly (I've got plenty more ideas for a "handle"!) but was confused for a while as to what had gone wrong. By the way, I've now discovered how to find the list of all registered user names so I should be able to avoid the same problem happening again!
- Cool. Feel free to let me know once you've chosen a new name and I can process the request expediently. Or here, even. –xenotalk 15:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
That's an offer I'm not going to turn down! Could you try to rename SHtemp to "AstroSteve" do you think? (yes, I have checked - it is free!) Would I have to log out while you did so?
- Probably not... This is
Done. Log in to the new name, and happy editing! –xenotalk 15:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Brilliant! That's what I call excellent service - many thanks!! Now let's get down to those edits.... AstroSteve (talk) 15:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
My RfA
Thanks for the heads up, I appreciate it. I decided to weigh in. --
Editing the infoboxes of astronauts?
Hi Xeno! I just had a question, and who else better to ask than an administrator! :D
I've noticed that when I try to edit the infoboxes of astronauts (in order to put in their alma mater), none of my changes to the infobox shows up when I preview the changes. Is there any specific reason for this?
- When I save the changes, none of the changes that I made to the astronaut's infobox show up. talk) 22:30, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- When I save the changes, none of the changes that I made to the astronaut's infobox show up.
- If you go to the page of talk • contribs) 23:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- If you go to the page of
- Infobox astronaut doesn't support alma_mater. at least not yet. Infobox standardisation will solve this problem soon. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:46, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- I added alma_mater support to the infobox. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Mag for teh win! –xenotalk01:28, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Mag for teh win! –
- I added alma_mater support to the infobox. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Infobox astronaut doesn't support alma_mater. at least not yet. Infobox standardisation will solve this problem soon. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:46, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you Magioladitis and Xeno for your help! :DDDDDD talk) 02:46, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you Magioladitis and Xeno for your help! :DDDDDD
Thanks
Thanks for doing the technical legwork with the inactivity desysop for admins and bureaucrats. I'm glad to see these proposals finally gain support. I know I had enough trouble just getting consensus to email inactive admins to ask them to voluntarily give up their rights if they didn't plan to use them (I don't think any did). Gigs (talk) 13:46, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- OH! I was trying to remember who wrote that bot. =) I was going to ask if you might be able to re-purpose it for ongoing notifications (30 day warning +email , 3 day warning). –xenotalk 13:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
An ArbComm case
Howdy. With your edit here, you reverted my previous edit. I trusted the report when it said "13 active arbitrators voted on the final decision before the case came to a close today." I should have actually checked that the case was closed. Thank you for fixing that, and sorry for the mistake.--Rockfang (talk) 15:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- No worries - and it is a little ambiguous as written. I guess you could look at it as: you bring your car to a stop in your driveway, but your driving activity isn't fully complete until you turn off the ignition. I think this is how Ncmvocalist has written it - the case is all but closed (and met the requirements for closing at publication time), but still needed (and needs) a clerk to formally close it. Hope that helps explain it. –xenotalk 15:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Bot flag
this edit is causing
User:Gilabrand
This request for amendment has been languishing for oh so long a time. Perhaps you could take the issue in hand and resolve it one way or another? Thanks, --Ravpapa (talk) 08:35, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Are you familiar with this bot? It's owner seems to be on an extended break. There is a pending request 10 days old that has not been addressed. I simply don't know if that's normal or not. I'm waiting patiently for it to move thousands of files into
- I'd give it some more time. Maybe shoot the owner an email. –xenotalk 12:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Can you take a peek...
...at this (re: "bot" account and username policy)? Thanks! Frank | talk 02:43, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Just to be clear, that request was meant in your capacity as a member of 12:30, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
IB INTERVIEW User:Poysndi
Hello my name is Andres and in my ITGS (Infromation and technology in a global society)course, of the IB I need to interview someone who is related tot he issue of my choice. Since my issue is Wikipedia I was wondering if I could possibly interview you. I would greatly appreciate if so. Please provide me a way to contact you such as an e-mail address so I can send the interview. Thank You Poysndi (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:20, 21 July 2011 (UTC).
- You can email me via special:Emailuser/Xeno. Not sure when I will have time to respond though. –xenotalk 16:49, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
template interwiki
Hi, i have question my bot (rezabot) has flag to editing interwiki in enwiki.can i edit intereiki wiki standard script in templates? and categories? does it need to request different flag or not? thank for your timeReza1615 (talk) 21:31, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- The last time I checked, standard pywikipedia did not handle templates well. (Wikipedia:Bot policy#Interwiki links: Interwiki bots should not run unsupervised in Template namespace unless specifically designed to run on templates.) Categories should be fine. –xenotalk 12:44, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Help!!!
I don't know if this is the right place to ask, but can you help me? Another user had this username before me (See this) and his old signatures (in archived talk pages and closed discussions) link to my pages. Can you change them so that they link to that user's new username
- Hrm I don't have time to do this myself, but you could do it, or you could ask someone to do it at 18:05, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. I will do it if I am allowed to. But I just want to know if I can:
- 1) Edit other user's comments?
- 2) Edit archived talk pages and closed discussions? --talk) 18:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Question about usurpation request
Hello Xeno! I would like to ask you about your suggestion in Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations#Dipa1965 → Dipa request. Do you mean that, even if the usurpation is accepted by en.wiki, I would never have a global "Dipa" account unless the it.wiki user accepts to change his name there? Thank you in advance.--Dipa1965 (talk) 18:25, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Well, mostly the concern is that right now the it.wiki user has the "claim" to the name globally, as the user with the most edits with that name. If, for example, you had the name "Dipa" on some other project, and had more than 26 edits, then you would have the claim. Or you can just ask him if he minds you taking over the claim. –xenotalk 21:45, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Dipa again
I apologize for bothering you again! I would like to ask you about your response for the case Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations#Dipa1965 → Dipa. I think I don't fully understand your suggestion to ask the it.wiki user if I can take over the claim. If he would accept that (i.e. me taking over his claim), wouldn't it also mean that he should change his account name in it.wiki too? If the latter is true, I would be really hesitant because I don't think he would like it. Thank you again.--Dipa1965 (talk) 20:13, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- He can keep the name in it.wiki as long as you don't mind not being able to use your SUL on it.wiki. –xenotalk 12:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia
What will happen to Wikipedia in the future? --Amerq (talk) 10:47, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- 12:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I've removed the automatic signing in the {{unblocked}} template. However, after rethinking, there is a possibility that the purpose is to substitute that template. Do you want the unblocked template substituted (basically, have it transcluded as {{unblock reviewed}})? If that's the case, I'll undo my edit. Thanks in advance, HeyMid (contribs) 10:05, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- Yes - was meant to be subst'ed. =) –xenotalk 12:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Great idea. Thanks, –xenotalk 12:49, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
History merge request
Hi there Xeno! :) Can you please history merge
- Sure.
Done. Wasn't sure which revision to leave live, so I left the last known mainspace revision (23 July) showing. –xenotalk 12:47, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Howdy. In my eternal trawling of the database for odd-looking fish, I've come across the hidden navbar on the Asbox template. I'm trying to assess the usefulness of this feature; as one of either it's users or implementers, I'd like to draw your attention to Template talk:Asbox#Why the navbar ?. - TB (talk) 21:09, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. I don't use the navbar, so would not object to its removal. –xenotalk 21:21, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
Help Me Understand
Please help me understand why Andrew Lancaster put a copyrighted map which is not relevant to Haplotype J1 in general back on the page.
This map is specific to a certain J1 population and it is copyrighted with this at the bottom in the research paper with, "European Journal of Human GeneticsISSN: 1018-4813EISSN: 1476-5438© 2011 European Society of Human Genetics." It is NOT from a comic book. It is not released by the publisher. The one who claims it he has permission also claims to be a "prince." Even if he actually got permission, from Sergio Tofanelli et al, the copyright belongs to the publisher. There is no fair use of this document that can be justified, unless it is contested.
I took my time to go into this in detail. I posted why it should not be included on the page and in the Talk.
Please help me understand why he reverted my editing with absolutely no consultation. JohnLloydScharf (talk) 17:05, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- Looks to me like Andrew Lancaster was removing the image, it was an anonymous editor who added it back: [1]. –xenotalk 17:08, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Semi-pretection for a page
I think the page from Starsky & Hutch (film) should being semi-protected. It has been vandalized in the past and now again as I saw in the history. --Station7 (talk) 18:13, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- Please see 18:18, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Need some help please
Hi Xeno - Since you're on the ArbCom active arbitrator list, I thought you might be able to steer me in the right direction. I'm trying to look up any ArbCom decisions regarding disputes about inclusion/exclusion of controversial wikilinks in "See also" sections of articles in order to inform my understanding of current community-wide consensus on exactly what should be included in "See also" sections, and what shouldn't. I tried searching the archives using "see-also" as the search term, but all I get are people saying "see also...X", which is a rather inconvenient coincidence. Is there any way I can fine tune the search for what I'm looking for, or do you have any knowledge of this type of ArbCom dispute that I might peruse? In case you're interested, the current dispute about this issue is here at DRN and here on the article talk page. Thanks. Shirtwaist ☎ 06:21, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm - can't say I can think of any off-hand, but admittedly I didn't follow arbitration much before I was elected. You might consider posting this query at 12:27, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- As a matter of fact, it has been brought out in the DRN that an ArbCom case in 2006 dealing with a disruptive editor resulted in the adoption of this proposal, and the non-adoption of this proposal. The current wording in the "See also" section of MOS(layout) being debated now, e.g. "Links included in the "See also" section may be useful for readers seeking to read as much about a topic as possible, including subjects only peripherally related to the one in question" (emphasis is mine) was added in 2008, apparently without any related discussion. I was just wondering if any new consensus on just what "peripherally related" means. I think you're right that if no resolution is found, RFC is the next step, although correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't RFC supposed to precede DRN in the dispute resolution process? Not sure if the OP was aware of that...oh well. Thanks! Your help is appreciated. Shirtwaist ☎ 23:30, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
- Good find. No, RFC is not necessarily a precursor to a DRN thread. –xenotalk04:35, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Good find. No, RFC is not necessarily a precursor to a DRN thread. –
- As a matter of fact, it has been brought out in the DRN that an ArbCom case in 2006 dealing with a disruptive editor resulted in the adoption of this proposal, and the non-adoption of this proposal. The current wording in the "See also" section of MOS(layout) being debated now, e.g. "Links included in the "See also" section may be useful for readers seeking to read as much about a topic as possible, including subjects only peripherally related to the one in question" (emphasis is mine) was added in 2008, apparently without any related discussion. I was just wondering if any new consensus on just what "peripherally related" means. I think you're right that if no resolution is found, RFC is the next step, although correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't RFC supposed to precede DRN in the dispute resolution process? Not sure if the OP was aware of that...oh well. Thanks! Your help is appreciated. Shirtwaist ☎ 23:30, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
A loud mHi! from my dad, Kąġi oĥáŋko (I wish I spelled these words correctly, but my father wouldn't look at them...). -- 'Air Miss', his elder daughter
Air Miss 00:04, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Yes!!!
File:Concorde Cockpit.jpg | First real edit! |
I'm happy: I achieved my first real edit (at Air Antilles Express ) and I wish I wasn't flying in the clouds head over heels instead of straight and level...
I would like to send you a mail to ask things (if you have time) and give you news about Kąġi Oĥáŋko, but I'm didn't find the right button. Air Miss 00:32, 7 August 2011 (UTC) |
- Hi Air Miss. Just click xenotalk04:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Status of Wikipedia:Bureaucrats
Hi there. I noticed you tagged
07:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)- The page has been an information page for over 7 years, so I do not like the idea of gutting it to be a policy page - too much would need to be removed - perhaps the very few bits that aren't covered by policies or guidelines on other pages can be adapted onto a new page that would be transcluded by Wikipedia:Bureaucrats. See [2] for a suggested start (in my opinion, the actual policy implications of removal of admins bits should be inscribed at Wikipedia:Administrators). It's interesting how long bureaucrats have managed without a {{policy}} to govern them. =) –xenotalk 12:49, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- On the other hand, maybe 15:47, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- It describes how the administrator user right may be manipulated by bureaucrats. Wikipedia:Bureaucrats is currently a hybrid information page containing policy-like elements (what bureaucrats may do with their technical abilities), how-to elements (how they can do it), and strict informational elements (who are the bureaucrats, when are they available, who were the former bureaucrats, etc.). If there is some kind of tag that can be used to more accurately describe its hybrid nature, that would also be an option. But I think it should remain where it is, and mostly in its current form (as there is simply not enough there to require users to look at three different pages). –xenotalk15:53, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- How about {{Purpose}}?
- Seriously though, maybe we simply need to slap a hybrid tag on it? Something like this:
- How about {{Purpose}}?
- It describes how the
- On the other hand, maybe 15:47, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Errors In Message DeliveryHello, this is an automated message to inform you that some errors were encountered while processing your delivery request (Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity). Please deliver the messages to the following users manually, if you wish, because the bot was not allowed to do so:
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot at 16:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC).
Big Hugz to You
TypoHi there. Saw that you recently created Wikipedai:Reviewer, which has a typo (Wikipedai). Also, Wikipedia:Reviewer already exists (though it redirects to a different target). Best, Jenks24 (talk) 14:23, 11 August 2011 (UTC) WikiProject Banner template questionNote sure quite who to ask this question but you seem to be good with templates in general so I was hoping you might know the answer to this question. In the process of deprecting and merging several of the WikiProject banners into WikiProject US I have noticed that some of the banners continue to get used which leaves me with 2 possibilities. Heres were I could use some advice.
Using the first method I notice that in addition to not showing the supported project, I also tried to put the deprecation category but it doesn't populate. Probably becuause it redirects it before it gets to the category I'm guessing. I am sorta leaning with going with option 2 but do you have any thoughts on this? -- talk ) 20:52, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
TemplateDo you like categorization being removed at all from the User:Xenocidic/Stormy template? Being in your userspace leaves the decision up to you, so I believe... By the way, do you like the gnomish work I'm doing on templates, starting top-down from Wikipedia:Userboxes/Media/Books? Still got no feedback. ZipoBibrok5x10^8 (talk ) 11:44, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
does not know what rollback is used for. I'm requesting you to remove his rollback rights for constantly abusing his privileges. Walrus068 (talk) 23:42, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
Two of those are vandalism. (2 and 3)-- talk ) 00:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Rollback removalReally. Give me some examples.-- talk ) 00:30, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Apparently I wasn't paying attention. Sorry. Everybody makes mistakes.-- talk ) 00:36, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Edit Count-itis.Can you take a look at my comments at User talk:Koavf? This is the third run-in with him I've had over the past few months, and that excludes a couple of things where I took the silent route! Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 10:28, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation/RevertsI suspect User:117.205.54.37 is a sockpuppet of User:117.205.48.214 along with several other IPs. An investigation is necessary. I'll do an edit summary next time I revert.-- talk ) 16:06, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
UsurpHi Xeno, before I formally request username change to "Lionel" (to drop the 't' on current name) wanted to get your advice. The account here is long inactive, but I think the there is a "Lionel" on the Spanish wiki (?) with recent edits? I doesn't affect me since I don't speak Spanish. Thanks! – Lionel (talk) 02:42, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Re: FYIThanks for the message on my user page. I am not particularly attached to my username, and wanted to avoid trying to usurp another user, so I had thought the rename would give an easier solution, as well as leave the user on the French site the opportunity to use the name globally (the username "Dorade" is french anyway, so more appropriate for a french user - I just picked it as a word that wasn't in use). If a username change is complicated, I could try the usurp process, but I have a different username on the french site that I should also try and match up, and it is too close to my real name so I should really rename that one, too, but I will do that via the local site. — Preceding
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ged Sparrowhawk (talk • contribs) 14:16, 22 August 2011 (UTC) SULinfoThank you again for the new and improved SUL tool. Would it be possible to have the default display be sortable? Also - would it be possible to have the default display allow you to re-run the query with the additional options available? –xeno 12:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
← Very nice! If there was anything I could do to get the WMF to advance you 2 hours salary for your efforts, I certainly would do so ;> –xenotalk 17:00, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Cirt-Jayen WorkshopAmid the recent reversions, the comments by Peter and myself were left out. If the material ends up being kept on the Workshop page, please restore all of the comments that were made in reply to it. Thanks. --Tryptofish (talk) 15:45, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Need a little adviceHi I have a sensitive subject that needs delicate handling and I do not know exactly how to go about it. Difficult to explain, so I will use regular editor (RE), copyeditor (CER), and I (me) for the three parties involved. I had a look at an article that had been mentioned during a copy-edit for GOCE. Once I had a look at the article I decided that the CER was perhaps not fully aware of what the RE was using was regular philatelic talk. It was also apparent that the article was undergoing more edits and that I should remove it from the GOCE requests list as it would probably be better to wait until the REs were finished before the CER copy-edited it. While I was there I read the article and concluded that perhaps there were too many images of a certain type. I stated this opinion on the talk page. The CER and the RE joined the discussion, and I sugested removing a few of the less relevant images as nine of them seemed a little OTT. The RE has responded by deleting all "his" images (he refers to them as his images), removing a vast amount of text, links, refs, sections etc. I can understand that many of the images removed may well be from his personal collection, but some appear to be from flickr or a German archiving source, as well as two uploaded by other editors. My questions are: Can an editor remove material they have created (text) if they decide they no longer wish to be involved with an article?; and should one revert if it seems the RE's removal has removed more than just their work? I am sure this will have come up before and I wondered if you can either advise me, or point me in the right direction, as to how this has been handled before; what you might do in the situation; and the best way to get the ER back into the article. If I revert him, and delete any images he may have contributed, I suspect it will only widen the gap and burn any possible bridges. I have extended a plea on the ER's talk page. I also feel bad that I may have been the one that caused them to pursue this course of action, though I was trying to be extra cautious after seeing another editor thought there may be ownership issues. After adding a note on their page I have just seen that there was an ongoing debacle with a fourth editor (post above mine on the user's talk page and a couple above on the article talk page).
Any advice would be more than appreciated ¦¬( Chaosdruid (talk) 09:01, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Delivery requestA week ago I made a delivery request for CT Cooper · talk 11:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
TT
Good call. 28bytes (talk) 22:13, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
If you seriously think that it would be legitimate to slap down an indefinite hardblock for the posting of an anonymous criticism of Wikipedia by a good-faith productive editor, then (and I really never thought I'd have to say this to you, Xeno) it is time to resign your various bits on the grounds of extreme incompetence. ╟─TreasuryTag►District Collector─╢ 12:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Delicate matterHi Thanks for the advice, sometimes wood from the trees etc. lol Anyway, Kumioko fixed it before I got back today so all bullets going his way on that one lol ;¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 22:26, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanksappreciate the headsup. :). Thanks for your valuable work. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC) Thanks for prompt actionI am very grateful to you for your prompt action.-- talk ) 16:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
TreasuryTagI removed the hardblock because it seems silly not to allow him to directly post unblock requests; you appear to have redone it. Could you ) 19:50, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
How best to do this?I was just about to remove my entire section given the indef'ing. But now you've (sorta) replied to it. So feel free to refractor my comments right up to nothing, at your discertion about what is best. Egg Centric 19:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Question about speedy keepHi there. I respect your judgement and even-handedness on all things WP, so I wanted to get your take on a situation. Would you consider speedy keep under criterion 2? Based on some of the history, it seems like the nominator may be acting in bad faith, as there was a recent keep of a similar list. I made a few more comments at the AFD, and I've already added sources, but since I've already !voted, I'm not sure if it would be correct to close it myself. Thanks in advance for your response. —Torchiest talkedits 17:25, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Changing Username from Babajiskriyayoga to DevadasLavoieI am aware of the implications of using a realname. This name is actually a given yoga/spiritual name and is OK. Thank you — Preceding Changing usernameHi Xeno! Thanks very much for taking action on my request to change my username from Alin (Public Policy) to Alin (WMF). I was wondering, though, if this username change also automatically reflects the same username change on other Wikimedia projects (like a different-language Wikipedia, or Wikimedia Commons)? I'm asking because I found out that while the username change worked seamlessly on the English Wikipedia, it did not automatically happen on other language Wikipedias or Wikimedia Commons. I tried to unify my Alin (WMF) account, but all this did was allow me to log into other Wikimedia projects with this username, but failed to transfer any of my watchlist items or contribution history. Could you help me change my username on these other Wikimedia projects from Alin (Public Policy) to Alin (WMF) as well? Thanks very much! Annie Lin (Wikimedia Foundation) (talk) 17:19, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Why UserName different than other noticeboards?Others divide up involved and uninvolved. But the big issue I see is that Mugginsx is so disruptive that no one can get the story straight. I'll just have to do an ANI on her. CarolMooreDC (talk) 22:08, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Can a RFC be closed before the accused editor has even had a chance to speak?I have never heard of this. Is this done here? CarolMooredc is always accusing me of disrupting, whether it be on the article talk page or to the RFCs she has initiated with me three within three weeks. If anyone is being WP:harassed it is me. But regardless, I stated at the beginning that I would be the advocate for ThisLaughingGuyRightHere until he had a chance to come online. Also I knew the all but one accusation were false but that due to the accused editor's inexperience, he would not be able to answer them and that is what I believe that CarolMooredc hoped for. Still, I think he should have at least a chance to answer for himself. Mugginsx (talk) 22:58, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
Regarding my idea Watchlist Feature at the Village PumpYou cited a policy on metawiki that said administrators, or whoever, weren't allowed to view watchlists. How was that relevant? It doesn't appear to eliminate the use of a bot, because bots cannot understand watchlists. Interchangeable|talk to me 19:26, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Delivery SuccessfulHello, this is an automated message to inform you that your message delivery request (Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity) was completed successfully. Happy editing! Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot at 14:05, 4 September 2011 (UTC).
Hi Xeno. Nice to see that my suggestion was realized. I'd like to suggest a table-style for this page though, such as this example. What do you think? Regards SoWhy 17:52, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
{{/user|Conscious|lastedit=10 July 2010|email=20110809|email2=20110903|note=diff1|note2=diff2}}
Koavf and AWBJust to let you know that I've re-added Koavf to the AWB checklist. I'd said I'd do it on request, and he's requesting it for different work than the tagging which got it removed in the first place, but thought it only polite to give you a heads-up anyway. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 11:28, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
I care
I care. I don't know how to use warning templates. I will only report level 4's to the aiv noticeboard. (learned my lesson there) I will give some explanation to vandals about their vandalism. Please put the link to the warning template page on my userpage.-- talk ) 00:28, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
FYI: I've blocked him for a month for his reporting of users who have not violated their final warnings yet. You warned him earlier that he could/would face an indefinite block if he continued with his warning/reverting issues, so I figured I'd give you a heads up. either way (talk) 00:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
AWBTh thread is not about AWB. Rich Farmbrough, 01:21, 9 September 2011 (UTC).
Re: SmackBot 39What you say sounds valid, but I am struggling to understand the fix to the template you are suggesting. Moving it over the redirect? Adding a new parameter? Or is there a magic word of use here (I can't think of one)? Regards, - Jarry1250 [Weasel? Discuss.] 17:13, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Quick handHi xeno. I'm not really familiar with CHU, so I was wondering if you could do something quickly for me. There is no question that this should be declined, but I wasn't sure if a 'crat needs to do that, and if it's okay to just remove the section outright (as a personal attack), or if that would mess with the bot. Anyway, if you could take a look that would be great. Thanks, - Kingpin13 (talk) 19:23, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
De-adminning accountsHi. When you remove rights from an account, it probably makes sense to check the user's user page for accuracy. I realize this isn't strictly necessary and that the stewards don't do this, but making simple changes such as these can make life much easier for passersby. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:27, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Name changeHello, I was hoping to get a name change, as I'm looking to contribute to wikipedia but need something more secure in terms of my name. Can you help me out? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanMonell820 (talk • contribs) 23:24, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
IRCIf you're online, could you hop on #wikipedia-BAG? I'd like to discuss something with you, and get some advice, if you're willing. -FASTILY (TALK) 01:27, 10 September 2011 (UTC) Hi, since you're a CheckUser I thought I would come to you. I recently came across a rather odd user called CAT:SD. Their talk page history reveals nothing of interest, and their global contribs indicate they have only edited here and itwiki, and that those edits consisted of three benign edits and four eventually RevDeled (or OSed? can't tell) spam edits, earning them a block over there. They might have other deleted contributions that I can't see.
Anyway, it all certainly seems odd to me, and I can't imagine that these would be the edits of a first-time user. Looking at SPI yet since I have no idea who the main account might be, and so was wondering what your professional advice was. It Is Me Here t / c 21:34, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
FacepalmHullo there. I am surprised to see that 'facepalm' has its own article. As you know it was deleted by consensus as non-notable. Then when the redirect you created was also nominated for deletion two years later, somehow it was saved on the basis that it is now suddenly notable, yet in its present form the article still does not reflect this, as it has only one reference - Know Your Meme - and that is quite obviously not reliable. This word has only ostensibly existed since around 2007 - it is a purely internet derived term or 'meme'. I suggest that it goes through the deletion process again or is merged into List of gestures. --78.150.164.120 (talk) 10:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
On a iPhoneI can't for the life of me figure out how to edit or log in from an iPhone, at least using the Wikipedia app. Do I have to go through the browser instead?--~TPW 16:21, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Xeno - ArbitronThe user admitted it was messed up. Can you delete, please? --Hinata talk 23:55, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
fyi
My accountYou think I could USURP to my old (Secret) account from this account User:Secretalt if it's possible. I want to reedit again as Secret, but I can't recover the password from that account. Thanks Secret account 07:40, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks!Appreciate your help with my sandbox. BusterD (talk) 16:05, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thank youThank you for usurping, etc. Also, dark itself is a problem word without going to the moon even. Like most words, it is unsimply a relative measurement. -- Queeg (talk) 01:59, 16 September 2011 (UTC) Deletions
I notice that yesteday and today you have been moving and deleting several pages to do with the right to vanish request but now there is no page to start a new investigation and more importantly no history to link to for an admin to review unless I happen to remember to make a note of these previous pages and remember the page names. Any other editor may not even know or remember the previous sock activity, so any new investigation looks like a simple new sock and not sockmaster who damaged two articles and kept on promoting his own organisation and product. How come all pages related to this user and his sock activity have been deleted and are now unavailable for regular editors? TIA ww2censor (talk ) 15:20, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
FFDThere is a discussion at T/C ) 15:30, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank youThank you, Xeno, so much for handling my request so quickly; it means a lot to me. With appreciation and gratitude, -Tristessa de St Ange (talk) 03:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC) Impersonating me!!!Dear Wikimate, Kindly check the actions done by this user. He is impersonating my ID and leaving false messages in my talk page. Kindly check this edit. Kindly do the needful. arun talk 07:58, 18 September 2011 (UTC) Recent mass nominations at FFDYou may be interested in User_talk:SchuminWeb#You.27re_deleting_files_too_soon and the undelete requests below it. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:47, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
username change requestsHi Xeno, could you please kindly action the 6+ awaiting username changes?
Thanks for processing my usurpation request. :) Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 15:07, 20 September 2011 (UTC) RE: FYI(Re) Thanks for letting me now. I withdrew the statement. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 17:40, 22 September 2011 (UTC) Research into the user pages of Wikipedians: Invitation to participateGreetings, My name is John-Paul and I am a student with the University of Alberta specializing in Communications and Technology. I would like to include your Wikipedia user page in a study I am doing about how people present themselves online. I am interested in whether people see themselves in different ways, online and offline. One of the things I am looking at is how contributors to Wikipedia present themselves to each other through their user pages. Would you consider letting me include your user page in my study? With your consent, I will read and analyze your user page, and ask you five short questions about it that will take about ten to fifteen minutes to answer. I am looking at about twenty user pages belonging to twenty different people. I will be looking at all user pages together, looking for common threads in the way people introduce themselves to other Wikipedians. I hope that my research will help answer questions about how people collaborate, work together, and share knowledge. If you are open to participating in this study, please reply to this message, on your User Talk page or on mine. I will provide you with a complete description of my research, which you can use to decide if you want to participate. Thank-you, John-Paul Mcvea Johnpaulmcvea (talk) 20:51, 22 September 2011 (UTC) Hi, me again (I asked you about SPI a little while back). I recently came across a VOA which I blocked, but the user clearly knows their way around Wikipedia (the link to WP:PN, and the suggestive title "I don't go away" – see deleted contribs), and so is surely someone's alt? But, again, since I don't know my way around SPI (and wouldn't know which was the user's main account), I was hoping for some advice from your good self. It Is Me Here t / c 21:33, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
It's transcluded! Thank you again for co-nominating me. Anomie⚔ 12:00, 24 September 2011 (UTC) News of a dear friend![]() It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{ 15:44, 24 September 2011 (UTC) at any time by removing the SUL accountHi, I turned my account to SUL, so what's the next step? Thanks Debate 17:31, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Xania's Italian flag in my RfAHi. Thanks for redoing my edit; I agree that just adding initial colons to the offending image wikilinks is a much better approach. (And I knew about that trick and should have thought of it myself! Oh, well.) Richwales (talk) 21:00, 24 September 2011 (UTC) Thank-you for agreeing to participate in my studyThank-you for agreeing to participate in my study, entitled “Online Self-presentation among Wikipedians.” I appreciate it. As I indicated in my last message (which you have since archived), here are five short questions about your user page that I would like you to answer. These will help me to understand your motivations for creating a user page such as yours. Please be as brief or as thorough as you like.
1. Are you a member of social networks such Facebook or MySpace?
2. In addition to maintaining a user page in Wikipedia, have you also written or edited articles? If so, about how many times?
3. What are the key messages about yourself that you hope to convey with your user page?
4. Have your Wikipedia contributions ever received feedback, such as being edited by others or commented on? Have you received a message from another Wikipedia user? If so, do you think your user page positively or negatively affected what other people said and how they said it?
5. Do you see your “online self” as being different from your “offline self?” Can you elaborate?
Please indicate your answers to these questions on your talk page, or on mine. Please respond by October 1st so that I have time to properly read your responses. If you like, you can email your answers to me instead ([email protected]). Thank you again : ) Johnpaulmcvea (talk) 19:59, 26 September 2011 (UTC) Additional information & consent statement ADDITONAL INFORMATION Background • I am asking you to participate in a research project that is part of my MA degree. • I am asking you because you have created a user page in Wikipedia that other people can use to learn about you. Purpose • My research is about how people present themselves online. • I will look at how people present themselves when presenting themselves to the Wikipedia community.
• With your consent, I will analyze the language of your user page and gather basic statistics such as the count of words, the frequency of words, the number of sections, and so on. • I will also read the text of your user page, looking for elements in common with ads posted by other people. I will note whether you include a picture, or links to other content on the internet. • I ask you to answer my five questions, above. This will take about ten to fifteen minutes to complete. I will ask you to answer the questions within a week, and send your answers to me. • Throughout my research, I will adhere to the University of Alberta Standards for the Protection of Human Research Participants, which you can view at http://www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/gfcpolicymanual/policymanualsection66.cfm
• There is no direct benefit to you for participating in this research. You may, however, find it interesting to read my perspective on how you present yourself online. • I hope that the information I get from doing this study will help understand how technology affects the way people come together into a society. • There is no reward or compensation for participating in this research.
• There is no direct risk for participating in this research.
• You are under no obligation to participate in this study. Participation is completely voluntary. • You can opt out of this study at any time before October 10, 2011, with no penalty. You can ask to have me withdraw any data that I have collected about you. Even if you agree to be in the study, you can change your mind and withdraw. • If you decline to continue or you wish to withdraw from the study, your information will be removed from the study at your request.
• This research will be used to support a project that is part of my MA degree. • A summary of my research will be available on the University of Alberta website. • Your personally identifiable information will be deleted and digitally shredded as soon as I have finished gathering data about you. • Data will be kept confidential. Only I will have access to the computer file containing the data. It will be password protected. It will not be sent by email or stored online. • I will always handle my data in compliance with University of Alberta standards. • If you would like to receive a copy of my final report, please ask. Further Information • If you have any further questions regarding this study, please do not hesitate to contact Dr. Stanley Varnhagen, my research advisor for this project. If you have concerns about this study, you may contact the University of Alberta Research Ethics Committee at 780-492-2615. This office has no affiliation with the study investigators.
By answering these questions, you indicate your agreement with the following statements: • That you understand that you have been asked to be in a research study. • That you have read and received a copy of the Information Sheet, attached below (“Additional Information”). • That you understand the benefits and risks involved in taking part in this research study. • That you have had an opportunity to ask questions and discuss this study. • That you understand that you are free to refuse to participate, or to withdraw from the study at any time, without consequence, and that your information will be withdrawn at your request. • That the issue of confidentiality been explained to you and that you understand who will have access to your information (see “Additional Information”). • That you agree to participate. Thank-you again! Johnpaulmcvea (talk) 19:59, 26 September 2011 (UTC) Re: LivingBot typoThanks, fixed that (and "grievious"). - Jarry1250 [Weasel? Discuss.] 20:01, 26 September 2011 (UTC) Edit reattribution issue; account automatically recreated
Thanks for changing my username over. Not sure if I'm missing something but a small number of my edit history and articles created appear not to have copied over and my old username is still active as well. talk ) 09:49, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
![]()
Re: usurpation CrioI added to the usurpation of Crio in the usurpation page. Thanks for all your help. Cheers. --Crio de la Paz 17:05, 27 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crio de la paz (talk • contribs) Thanks a lot! --Crio de la Paz (talk) 04:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC) Merge usernameshello.. i have 2 accounts in wikipedia - one with 1300 edit counts and other with 300 edit counts. is there a way to merge these accounts into one. in fact i want the 300 count account to be merged with my 1300 count account. pls do help me out regarding the possibilities.. Thanks a lot talk ) 07:26, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
|