User talk:Ybbor

This user may have left Wikipedia. Ybbor has not edited Wikipedia since May 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

I like to keep all discussions in one place. If I go to your talk page, reply on your talk page. If you post here, I'll reply here.

Archives

2006 2007

The edits are accurate and cited. Perhaps you should do some research instead of just blindly erasing what you don't like on certain pages, you stupid fascist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Themightyjew (talk • contribs) 03:05, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Other users may want to note the edit in question was here, accused a living person of hating a minority group (unsourced), and was previously removed by two other users.--Ybbor^Talk 23:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm quite aware of the guidelines for Wikipedia. I was not experimenting, I made a tremendous accident which I apologized for. Please do not reprimand or scold me for something I did by accident, became clearly aware of afterward, and immediately rectified. Thank you, and I wish you better luck in tracking down actual vandals. CinnamonCinder (talk) 06:35, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I meant no offense in what I said, and had no way to know your intentions. You experimented on a page, realized your mistake, and reverted it yourself. I then went to your page and used {{

test-self}}, to note that I noticed you were experimenting on a live page (BLP nonetheless), and then thanked you for reverting it yourself. I will continue to take such action whenever I see such behavior. Often times such behavior (although apparently not in your case) makes people think they can get away with editing Wikipedia without anyone noticing which damages our credibility.--Ybbor^Talk 23:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:68.82.2.131&redirect=no

re: GUESS WHAT???????? YOU WIN!!!

Eh? is this a mistake? I got this "message" just now about changes done in erm, 2007? My guess is the former owner of the house [Freehold, NJ] we now own did this naughtiness as it was not me, as we only moved here in the spring from Princeton, NJ.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_presidential_election%2C_2004&diff=133899595&oldid=133783322

These are my recent legit edits. I re-edited an article to show my IP has obviously changed from 68.82.242.150 to the one below;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/68.82.2.131

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/68.82.242.150 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.82.2.131 (talk) 22:23, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:68.82.2.131, 18:08 EST, August 18th 2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.82.2.131 (talk) 22:12, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Thomas Jefferson Junior High School, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Jefferson Junior High School. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fæ (talk) 06:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Transitions lenses has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a content fork of

Transition lenses

. Also, it reads like an advertisement rather than an informative article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Padillah (talk) 17:30, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:44, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the

WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:21, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free image File:CFC screenshot.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 15:28, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards,

Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

"Stephen Colbert (charecter)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stephen Colbert (charecter). Since you had some involvement with the Stephen Colbert (charecter) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:06, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Honda (congressman)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Honda (congressman). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 18#Honda (congressman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 02:24, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]