User talk:Yodaki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Yodaki, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions
. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Húsönd 13:51, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Assessment of Portugal

While you have every right to ask for a justification of my assessment of the Portugal article (B-class on EU project), please do not delete such an assessment; ever. In the extreme cases such reversions on a talk page can even be considered vandalism.
If you were looking for justification of the assessment, you could have asked this on my talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, you could have asked for a reassessment by a different editor at the EU project assessment page.
Why I came to B-level. There are reasons for that level, in response to your request in the summary of the revert I have listed these on the Portugal talk page. I hope this clarifies my motives. Cheers Arnoutf (talk) 11:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, the article, as of February 2008, doesn't even deserve to have a B-level. That was the source of my confusion. Yodaki (talk) 13:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, ok. I thought you supported the A given in the Portugal project. To be honest B class is a category that is given with different levels of quality. I would say it holds enough information, structure, references and support for B; although I agree that it might be possible to contest that (and put it at start). Anyway, thanks for the note on Portugal talk. Cheers. Arnoutf (talk) 14:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Associação Académica de Coimbra

Hello Yodaki! Thanks for your contribution to my page move request (you seem to be the only one interested). I'm a bit confused of what the AAC really is. In the article it says it's a students union like the

Crvena Zvezda is at Red Star Belgrade on the English Wikipedia and at Estrela Vermelha de Belgrado on pt.wiki (and that's a much more famous club/association than the AAC). Respectfully, Sebisthlm (talk) 11:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

So, it is a students' union with sporting activities? The UEFA page you linked are for AAC-OAF and as I said it shouldn't be translated (just drop the Associação), but from what I understand from the article on AAC-OAF is that it's a separate club. If indeed OAF is part of the same club as the other AAC I'm willing to move them to Académica Coimbra - volleyball section and so forth. But you haven't convinced me yet! Sebisthlm (talk) 19:53, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Associação Académica de Coimbra
2

Yeah, I know. I'm not satisfied with the move myself (even though I suggested it). The move I was trying to make in the first place was for

Académica de Coimbra - basketball
. I think the student union perhaps can stay at
Estádio Universitário de Coimbra
.

In this case the student organization would be at Coimbra Academic Association (with the Portuguese name in the first sentence) as an umbrella over the different sub-articles, of which the sports sections would have their (shortened) sporting name. It would look like this:

  • Coimbra Academic Association "the Associação Académica de Coimbra is the student union...under which there are, among other cultural sections, different sports sections competing in the Portuguese league systems" (or something like that)
  • Académica de Coimbra "the Associação Académica de Coimbra - O.A.G. is the autonomous professional football club" (with a hatline at the top of the page:"this article is about the football club; for the students union, see Coimbra Academic Association
    ")
  • Estádio Universitário de Coimbra
    "their stadium (where other sports are played as well)"

What is your opinion? Best regards, Sebisthlm (talk) 10:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I agree with your suggestion. It's better than user Shearer's. For him, Real Madrid should be referred to as Royal Madrid. I can't agree with such nonsense. Yodaki (talk) 16:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have revered your move of

talk) 12:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Associação Académica de Coimbra

Associação Académica de Coimbra is a Portuguese multisports club with several teams which compete in many top sports leagues and championships of Portugal, ranging from rugby union to volleyball to athletics. As far as I known, sports teams names are never translated in English see

Real Madrid. Please, restore the teams' names and redirects to the previous versions in Portuguese or simply to a shorter form of the Portuguese name like Academica Coimbra or so. Yodaki (talk) 11:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi, why are you asking me this? --
chi?
15:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, it's because of this [1] . Yodaki (talk) 15:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The job of the bot is to fix double redirects - a technical task. I take no part in the name of the article by doing so. If you look at page history you'll see that
chi? 16:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

False
long term abuse
reports

Reports such as [2] to the long term abuse page are not acceptable. This page is for tracking users who utilize sockpuppetry and harassment, and in general are permanently banned. I will

dispute resolution process for acceptable ways of settling one's differences with another editor. Seraphimblade Talk to me 08:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Weee, Wikipedia works! (joking) Yodaki (talk) 13:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

The edits you made to

Neutral Point of View policy, and just creates more work for others to remove. - JasonAQuest (talk) 14:21, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Yeah. My personal analysis which was published in
CNN Money[1] and Yahoo! Finance[2], as well as in the Financial Times[3] and others. I am a guru! You just create more work for me to restore. Yodaki (talk) 14:48, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Opinions don't belong in an encyclopedia of facts, regardless of where they might have been published previously. (Allan Chernoff would know that.) You can add your opinionated commentary as many times as you want, but the people who've read and understood Wikipedia policy about NPOV will continue to challenge it. - JasonAQuest (talk) 15:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, thank you for dropping the most obviously inappropriate adjectives from the version you restored. I hope this indicates that you've decided to stop being part of the problem you speak of on your User page, and be part of the solution. - JasonAQuest (talk) 15:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ah...cool. Yodaki (talk) 15:12, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

unreferencedBLP
}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Adriano Moreira - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Jaime Silva (Portugal) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Crime importation

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Crime importation, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&se=gglsc&d=5000566127. As a copyright violation, Crime importation appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Crime importation has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the

Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License
(CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Crime importation and send an email with the message to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Crime importation with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the
    CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Crime importation
    .

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Category:Résumé frauds and controversies has been nominated for deletion

Category:Résumé frauds and controversies has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 15:19, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ http://money.cnn.com/2008/03/21/commentary/bear_bailout/
  2. ^ http://biz.yahoo.com/cnnm/080321/032108_bear_bailout.html?.v=2
  3. ^ http://blogs.ft.com/maverecon/2008/03/rescuing-the-bear-why-and-why-this-way/
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yodaki&oldid=1085419726"