User talk:Zanze123

Hello, Zanze123! helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 12:52, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply ] Getting started Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation User scripts

Please confirm the difference between primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary as far as Wikipedia is concerned. Thanks

Zanze123 (talk) 17:37, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The following sections will hopefully explain how to make references.

For the details of what is a primary, secondary, etc. please see

WP:PRIMARY

. In brief, a primary source is, for example, the website of the company that is the subject of the article. A press release by the company, or a website that showed information about the company and was paid to do so by the company, would also be a primary source. We avoid using primary sources; we look for reliable secondary sources of information.

For example: If I claim that I am the Queen of England, and write that on my own MySpace website, that would not be an appropriate source. I would have to wait for the BBC News to pick up on my Queenhood, and then I could cite them.

A tertiary source is something like Wikipedia itself - a 'gatherer of information'. We don't like to cite those; instead, we like to find out where they got their information from, and cite that.

For more help, you can either;

• Leave a message on my own talk page; OR
• Use another {{helpme}} here,; OR
• Talk to us live, with this or this.

Best wishes,  Chzz  ►  17:50, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Simple references

These require two parts;

a)

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>

b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";

== References ==
{{reflist}}

(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)

To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Zanze123/reftest and try it out.

Named references

Chzz was born in 1837, <ref name="MyBook">
"The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. 
</ref> in Footown.<ref name="MyBook"/>

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates

You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation
 | last = Smith
 | first = John
 | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century
 | publication-date = 2001
 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]
 | page = 125
 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4
}}
</ref>

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Thank you for uploading

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 21:15, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hello, where is the ehret photo from? i'm curious because i would like to use it here. thx, Maximilian (talk) 19:50, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Walter Siegmeister has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient notability for

WP:Author

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:30, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Essie Honiball is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Essie Honiball until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Skeptic from Britain (talk) 03:49, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zanze123. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:51, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]