User talk:Zhuo1221

Hello, Zhuo1221 and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students. Go through our online training for students

If you need help, check out

Before you create an article, make sure you understand

Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:57, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning Zhuo.I think it's pretty complete now, but it would be nice if the Affiliates section could be expanded and supplemented. AYAO32269 (talk) 02:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see feedback your friends left you at User talk:Zhuo1221/sandbox _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:22, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening @Zhuo1221

I read your article well. I think it would have taken a lot of effort to write it. Since it covers a lot of text, why not attach some pictures to make it easier for the viewer to understand. I think you can find some relevant content at Wikipedia Commons. Hanjiseung (talk) 11:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to hear that. Since all my quoted sources originate from Chinese information, the channels are reliable. But is it because they are all in Chinese that you consider them unreliable? I'm sorry to disturb your break, as I'm a new student on the wiki editing team. I hope I can get your advice. Thanks. Zhuo1221 (talk) 06:34, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

WP:SECONDARY sources. Amigao (talk) 15:01, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Wikipedia:No original research states that reliable sources include content published in magazines, journals and books by reputable publishers. I have published content from well-known publishers such as ChinaNews.com, ChinaGov.com, and others. Is there any content that you are not satisfied with? Did all of the content strike you as unreliable information? Or is it the information about China News Service from official Chinese publishers that you find unreliable? I hope to get your reply, thanks. Zhuo1221 (talk) 09:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ChinaNews.com is a

WP:RS. Amigao (talk) 16:30, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

What I wrote is very objective and all based on evidence, if you think you can't use ChinaNews.com's content, then I wrote content from other Chinese publishers as well, and all of you deny the fruits of my labour. I want you to write Wikipedia objectively, not just describe China's international news agency based on your subjective ideas. The history I wrote is the development of China News Service, isn't it more detailed and accurate than what Chinese publishers give? Is there any error in my editing of the past leaders of the China News Service and its organisational set-up? If you think there are mistakes, I hope you will point them out clearly, instead of just deleting the fruits of other people's labour according to your own ideas. For a national news agency of China, I think it should not only have statements from foreign countries, but should edit Wikipedia information in a comprehensive way. Zhuo1221 (talk) 05:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is possible to use the information posted on ChinaNews.com. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability, WP:SELFPUB

WP:SELFPUBLISH. Zhuo1221 (talk) 05:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is possible to use the information posted on ChinaNews.com. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability, WP:SELFPUB

WP:SELFPUBLISH. Zhuo1221 (talk) 05:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source you cited does not satisfy the five criteria of

WP:ABOUTSELF. Amigao (talk) 14:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I post content that conforms to Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Zhuo1221 (talk) 16:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDEPENDENT might offer some additional clarification. Amigao (talk) 04:27, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]