War Before Civilization
OCLC 770942100 | |
War Before Civilization: the Myth of the Peaceful Savage (
Summary
Keeley conducts an investigation of the archaeological evidence for prehistoric violence, including murder and massacre as well as war. He also looks at nonstate societies of more recent times – where we can name the tribes and peoples – and their propensity for warfare.[2] It has long been known, for example, that many tribes of South America's tropical forest engaged in frequent warfare.
Keeley says peaceful societies are an exception. About 90–95% of known societies engage in war. Those that did not are almost universally either isolated
One-half of the people found in a
According to Keeley, among the
For example, at the
Chapter 5 compares civilized soldiers with primitive warriors. Keeley observes that tactical methods by civilized soldiers were not very good and that primitive methods were actually better. Indigenous groups in many areas of the world successfully defended and defeated multiple European colonization campaigns for decades due to primitive unorthodox warfare techniques like smaller mobile units, using small arms as opposed to artillery, open formations, frequent uses of ambushes and raids, surprise attacks, destruction of infrastructure (e.g. villages, habitations, foodstores, livestock, means of transportation), extensive uses of scouts. European conquests were greatly helped by ecological changes like diseases, viruses, and bacteria in defeating many indigenous groups since such conditions eliminated more indigenous people than did any armed conflict. The defeat of the Inca and the Aztecs are examples. Sometimes, primitive groups had better military foresight than civilized counterparts. Keeley relates an incident in which an Eipo tribal leader of highland Irian (in Western New Guinea) quickly thought of – and wanted to immediately use – aerial bombardment of enemies shortly after seeing an airplane for the first time. Keeley says the Western developers of planes took years to develop similar ideas. Many primitive techniques are preserved in modern times as guerrilla warfare.[11]
He makes three conclusions which The New York Times considers unexpected:
- that the most important part of any society, even the most war-like ones, are the peaceful aspects such as art
- that neither frequency nor intensity of war is correlated with population density
- that societies frequently trading with one another fight more wars with one another
Reception
When it was published, I thought my book would annoy everybody. Other than a few anthropologists whom I either ridiculed or found rather obvious mistakes in their analyses, the reception was instead surprisingly positive. This positive response was especially true of archaeologists.
The New York Times said that "the book's most dramatic payoff is its concluding explanation for the recent "pacification of the past" by scholars"[12] and that "...revulsion with the excesses of World War II has led to a loss of faith in progress and Western civilization....".
American political scientist Eliot A. Cohen described the book as "At once scholarly and lucid, he paints a dark picture of human nature, although he does not believe humankind is doomed to a perpetual striving for mutual extinction. A sobering, grim, and important book."[13] Anthropologist R. Brian Ferguson gave a mostly positive review but argued that Keeley overstated the commonality of ancient warfare and that aversion by academics to the existence of pre-historical warfare was misrepresented.[14]
The book was a finalist for the 1996 Los Angeles Times Book Prize for History.[15]
Selected academic reviews
- Bryjak, George J. (July 1997). "Book Review: War Before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage". Armed Forces & Society. 23 (4): 675–677. S2CID 144659141.
- Helms, Mary W. (1999). "Review of War before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage; Blood Rites: Origins and History of the Passions of War". Journal of World History. 10 (2): 431–434. S2CID 162372565.
- Franson, Robert Wilfred (July 2004). "Review: War Before Civilization - Lawrence H. Keeley". Troynovant. Franson Publications. Retrieved 2 January 2025.
- Meilinger, Phillip S.; Wrangham, Richard; Peterson, Dale; Keeley, Lawrence H.; Keegan, John (July 1997). "Demonic Males: Apes and the Origins of Human Violence". The Journal of Military History. 61 (3): 598. .
- Simons, Anna (February 1997). "Two Perspectives on War and Its Beginnings War Before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage. Lawrence Keeley Ride of the Second Horseman: The Birth and Death of War. Robert L. O'Connell". Current Anthropology. 38 (1): 149–151. S2CID 146215718.
- Straus, Lawrence G. (December 1997). "War before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage . Lawrence H. Keeley". Journal of Anthropological Research. 53 (4): 505–507. .
- Willis, Roy (February 1999). "War before civilization. The myth of the peaceful savage. BY LAWRENCE H. KEELEY. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1996. xii + 245 pp. Hb.: $25. ISBN 0 19 509112 4". Social Anthropology. 7 (1): 93–113. doi:10.1017/S0964028299280081 (inactive 7 March 2025).)
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of March 2025 (link
Errata
On page 93 Keeley wrote: "One author has very liberally estimated that more than 100 million people have died from all war-related causes (including famine and disease) on our planet during this century. (33)" ... Reference in "Notes" on page 215 says: "33. Rhodes 1986: 779 (citing Gil Eliot)."
Errors: Eliot is misspelled, should be "Elliot", and missing are Elliot's publication title and page number, which are: Twentieth Century Book of the Dead, 1972, page 1. This book is at the Internet Archive. The first sentence is: "THE number of man-made deaths in the twentieth century is about one hundred million. ..."
See also
- Constant Battles: Why we fight by Steven A. LeBlanc and Katherine E. Register (2004)
- The Better Angels of Our Nature by Steven Pinker (2011)
- Statistics of Deadly Quarrels by Lewis F. Richardson (1960)
- Douglas P. Fry, author of The Human Potential for Peace: An Anthropological Challenge to Assumptions about War and Violence (2006) and Beyond War: The Human Potential for Peace (2007)
References
- ^ Helms, M. W. (1999). War before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage/Blood Rites: Origins and History of the Passions of War. Journal of World History, 10(2), 431.
- ^ "War Before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage – Harvard Book Store". www.harvard.com. Retrieved 14 February 2019.
- ^ Nelson, T. J. (2006). "Review: War Before Civilization". randombio.com. Retrieved 14 February 2019.
- ^ Spengler (4 July 2006). "The fraud of primitive authenticity". Asia Times Online. Archived from the original on 6 July 2006. Retrieved 8 June 2009.
- ^ Windschuttle, Keith (16 August 2003). "Enduring myth of 'noble savage' vs. a species at continuous war?". Washington Times. Retrieved 8 June 2009.
- ^ "Saharan remains may be evidence of first race war, 13,000 years ago". The Independent. 14 July 2014.
- ^ "Proof of the First Race War Uncovered in Northern Sudan?". 16 July 2014.
- ^ See pp. 67–69 of the 1996 Oxford University Press edition of War Before Civilization
- ^ See pp. 118–119 of the 1996 Oxford University Press edition of War Before Civilization
- ^ "Crow Creek Massacre". www.usd.edu. Archived from the original on 22 November 1999.
- ISBN 9780195119121.
- ^ Lehmann-Haupt, Christopher (18 July 1996). "BOOKS OF THE TIMES;Even in Eden, It Seems, War Was Hell". The New York Times.
- ISSN 0015-7120. Retrieved 14 February 2019.
- .
- ^ "1996 Los Angeles Times Book Prize - History Winner and Nominees". Awards Archive. 25 March 2020. Retrieved 30 April 2023.
External links
- War Before Civilization, Internet Archive (opensource).
- Review from Asia Times
- Faculty Listing at UIC