Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion/Main Page (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep Malformed request (thank goodness) since the template wasn't placed on Main Page. That, and the nominator did this "for teh lulz." So... if you feel like getting some giggles, why not

Main Page

Main Page (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Look at this thing. Do you SEE what it is! Some corporation using article space to advertise itself! Wikipolicy does not allow that. If this was not full protected, I would have tagged it as db-spam, but it seems not. Cmon, fix the wiki already! And don't let the evil cabal get in your way! Buggie111 (talk) 00:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete and salt, blatant advertising. It's been deleted several times in the past as spam; see
  Here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Ultra strong super-strength delete per mine and User:SirFozzie's reasoning on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Proposal to stop new vandals. –MuZemike 01:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and Salt (maybe chuck in some garlic, noodles and some other stuff) per TPH.
  Talk Page · Contribs) 02:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment the page currently isn't tagged. The nominator should fix this ;) ThemFromSpace 02:39, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  Sure, I'll go start an RfA right now. Buggie111 (talk) 02:51, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete with extreme prejudice- with a troutslap at whoever created it again. Seriously. Who keeps creating it? SALT THIS MOTHER!Umbralcorax (talk) 02:55, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  Open fire. Buggie111 (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Delete 60K and not a single reference! —Soap— 03:01, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• DELETE no references, very large DESTROY Sign My Guestbook! User:Sumsum2010 03:09, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete per Sumsum2010. The thing has been deleted more than a dozen times, and yet it's still around? Desysop those wheel-warring admins! _sdda^sbagyonaled.J 03:37, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No references at all to support notability. Edison (talk) 04:01, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Ultra-Fast Speedy Delete In Only 1 Second - Material not appropriate for Wikipedia at all. December21st2012Freak ^{Talk to me} at 04:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This has been tried many times. Perhaps this time we will succeed. — BQZip01 — ^talk
• DELETE- not an encyclopedia article.  Kenrick  Talk 05:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Maybe moving it to
  the project namespace would solve the problem. Alexius08 (talk) 05:51, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete I hate that page. Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 06:32, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to portalspace, or projectspace. This is a selfreferential non-article.
  Wikipedia:Main page. (no, I don't really care actually, just being ridiculously anal for le poisson d'avril) 76.66.192.73 (talk) 06:44, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Speedy keep improper listing; AFD header is not posted on Main Page, as it should be. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 07:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Rename - to 'cover page'. Kayau Voting IS evil 09:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete
  WP:MADEUP one day, apparently by one User: Jimbo Wales. --Pgallert (talk) 09:44, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Speedy delete per lack of cowbell. Allison Tragedy (talk) 11:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect cross-wiki to this Uncyclopedia page. *Dan T.* (talk) 12:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: The Deletionist Jihad has gone too far. This has been mentioned on many livejournal entries.--Milowent (talk) 12:55, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not encyclopedic. Today's featured picture and Today's featured article are in violation of
  Rankiri (talk) 13:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Move to project space and create a disambiguation page listing all Main Pages. Meta content does not belong in article space. Reach Out to the Truth 13:57, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• STRONG KEEP - You just want to DESTROY useful information!!!!!1!1!!one! --
  T/C) 14:05, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• STRONG KEEP AGAIN - Voting twice because everyone but me is doubly wrong! --
  way too many edits outside this topic.[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.