Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ĝangalo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. no sources to back up meeting

Ĝangalo

Ĝangalo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This site's been dead since December 2006. Mithridates (talk) 18:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per
  WP:WEB, not because it's a dead site though, plenty of notable sites are dead. Present Alexa rank is 3,058,650, and according to the graph it never reached the top 100,000. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep: ‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 18:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - although it seems at present to fail
  WP:WEB I feel that several back links via Esperanto portal shows some importance. I believe relevant sources could be found to improve this article. Sting au Buzz Me... 05:48, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • By the way, I should note that this has nothing to do with my opinion on Esperanto, as I'm largely supportive of the language. I think a site like Libera Folio has a much better reason for having a page on the English Wikipedia (it's on the Esperanto and French Wikipedias at the moment). Mithridates (talk) 12:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 22:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep DidiWeidmann (talk) 12:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.