Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1990–91 Bristol Rovers F.C. season

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 15:45, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1990–91 Bristol Rovers F.C. season

1990–91 Bristol Rovers F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing in the article except an infobox. TheEditor867 (talk) 09:18, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete (or draftify?) if no one comes forth and offers to write some actual content. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 09:30, 6 June 2015 (UTC) The article as it is in not ready for mainspace, it's not a real article, it's a test. I don't really know what's going on in that article, so if someone could just write one sentence in there, then I'll change my !vote.I forgot I didn't have this article watchlisted so I didn't see the improvements... — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 07:55, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Keep — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 07:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.