Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009–10 Luton Town F.C. season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

2009–10 Luton Town F.C. season

2009–10 Luton Town F.C. season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 11:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Clearly passes
  WP:NSEASONS is exclusionary. The policy needs a rethink. SportingFlyer T·C 12:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep: Passes GNG—by a mile—
  reliable sources. ——Serial 12:13, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per GNG. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 12:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per
  WP:NSEASONS. Number 57 13:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - fails GNG as far as I can see. Lots of sources does not mean "significant coverage" - it all appears be ROUTINE/NOTNEWS. GiantSnowman 20:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• How is the coverage any different to
  WP:NSEASONS)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SportingFlyer (talk • contribs
  )

• Keep per
  WP:GNG. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 20:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - meets
  WP:GNG. There was plenty of coverage of this season: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17. LTFC 95 (talk) 22:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - I'm convinced that the sources above add up to a GNG pass. The season did get attention in national papers, for example The Times as well. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:49, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.