Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Tours stabbings

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable (

• Comment Nom failed
  WP:BEFORE, which quickly disproves specious assertions above.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Delete per nom.
  talk) 05:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  10:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  10:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1996 Paris Métro bombing simultaneously brought to AFD by this Nom.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: There was an increase in security in December 2014 because of a string of (never proven to be linked) attacks, but the impact of this specific one is not set to live long in collective memory. I swear this is a recreated article of a previous delete as well '''tAD''' (talk) 14:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Your
  WP:CRYSTALBALL is broken. In fact, as article shows, this stabbing attack figured in the discussion that followed the Charlie Hebdo shooting and is part of the conversation around this week's November 2015 Paris attacks.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• See very similar 2014 Endeavour Hills stabbings.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Note Nom's specious assertion that this attack would not be worth mentioning in a larger article. In fact, this attack has long been part of the articles: January 2015 Île-de-France attacks, List of terrorist incidents in France, 2014 Dijon attack, and 2014 Nantes attack to which I was able to add proper links, eg.: [1].E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• KEEP Article on a terrorist attack. Articles on terrorist attacks, hate crimes, and widely covered stabbing or shooting rampages are so normative on Wikipedia that nom ought to have an extraordinary justification for taking up the valuable time of editors by bringing such an article to AFD. The article is well sourced and passes
  WP:GNG.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. This event, which had happened in December 2014, has a long-lasting effect. For example, it has been noted in the timeline of "Terror attacks in France" in this source dated November 2015. My very best wishes (talk) 16:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - per
  WP:GNG and CRIME.--BabbaQ (talk) 23:12, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - Per everyone else. Also, attacking the credibility of the user who created this article implies much about your opinion about this. 75.80.175.107 (talk) 23:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Per
  WP:AFD process - it's the subject and the content that matters. The user who wrote it is completely irrelevant. ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep per
  WP:CRIME. --Article editor (talk) 16:58, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep as I saw this referanced in the news just yesterday Legacypac (talk) 08:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.