Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2espn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2espn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is one of those 'this could be a sentence in a another article' articles which has outlived its purpose; it's about a texting

chatter) 21:19, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:17, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:17, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:18, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:19, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No notability shown. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:27, 28 June 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Non-notable former service. WikiVirusC (talk) 15:48, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find any references on this. The archive link in the article doesn't even work for me, but even if it did, primary sources aren't be sufficient. --Hirsutism (talk) 22:07, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.