Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ablum by Duplex!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ablum by Duplex!

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems non-notable Charsaddian (talk) 10:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Charsaddian (talk) 10:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:09, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:30, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is the only album by the group (whose page also needs a lot of cleanup) with an article, and it doesn't present any information beyond a tracklist that otherwise justifies it. A mention on the band's page is probably enough. Peribirb (talk) 06:30, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Way back in the dark wikiages of 2006, Wikipedia's approach to the notability of albums was of the "any album released by a notable artist or band is inherently notable regardless of sourcing" — but that was long ago kiboshed, and has been replaced with having to get the album over
WP:GNG in its own right. This album doesn't meet the stricter standards of 2023 at all, and in fact by the standards of 2023 even the band's notability is more questionable than it would have been by 2006 standards. Bearcat (talk) 15:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.