Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ace of Clubs Records
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. And I removed the product catalog for obvious reasons, other then that AFD is not cleanup Secret account 01:57, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ace of Clubs Records
- Ace of Clubs Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
unsourced article that looks like a product catalogue!
WP:NOTDIRECTORY The Banner talk 00:36, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
- Delete per nom. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 23:19, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 12:52, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- This was a significant (but long obsolete) Classical record label, established in the period when the price came down from £2 or more to a guinea, which was still a lot of money in the 1960s. I agree that the article is a poor one, but that is a reason for improving it, not deleting it! Peterkingiron (talk) 17:41, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and clean up - historically significant. Not being used as marketing spam; long out of business; doesn't fall under normal "not a directory" guidelines. – SJ + 02:18, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.