Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Music

Maninder Buttar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician, fails

The sources are mainly unreliable and trivial. Zuck28 (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Music, India, Haryana, and Punjab. Zuck28 (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Subject meets criteria of
  WP:MUSIC: his songs have charted (e.g., "Sakhiyaan" with over 600 million views), he has been nominated for a notable award (PTC Punjabi Music Awards), and received substantial coverage in reliable sources, including recognition from Spotify. Notability is well-established. Cinelatina (talk) 20:39, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]

MixSingh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Fails

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists, Authors, Bands and musicians, Music, India, and Punjab. Zuck28 (talk) 20:20, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This biography is far better-sourced than most of the other Articles for deletion, and I am opposed to a Western bias of deletion of non-Western topics. - Poof positive (talk) 04:26, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  This is an invalid argument. See

  Wp:POV. Zuck28 (talk) 06:04, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Keep. Notability is demonstrated under
  WP:MUSIC. Subject has produced and composed for widely recognized artists and songs (e.g., "Sakhiyaan", "Sorry", "Saara India") released under independent labels. His production work has received broad exposure and coverage, confirming his significance in the Punjabi music scene. Cinelatina (talk) 20:37, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Kintsugi (Lana Del Rey song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. Sricsi (talk) 17:06, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Thin sourcing, one is a review of the song, the other is about the album... I don't see anything else showing notability, not charted, no awards won. I also don't find any sourcing about the song. Oaktree b (talk) 23:08, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Did You Know That There's a Tunnel Under Ocean Blvd, presently fails NSONG. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 21:55, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Room for Abuse 2006 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to have received significant coverage, should be deleted or merged into Room for Abuse. Smallangryplanet (talk) 12:42, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. Smallangryplanet (talk) 12:42, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Spunge: Changed to redirect from merge. See below reasoning. Nixleovel (He/They) (Talk • Contribs) 13:18, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Spunge: No SIGCOV in RS. Not certified gold, awards, charting or any other notability. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 04:30, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Akanksha Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is a non-notable actress and model who has made only minor appearances in films and music videos. The "Filmography" section is misleading, as she did not have a lead role in

Concerns include potential manipulation of her date of birth, with primary source citations (e.g., Instagram) contradicting verifiable information, such as her being 20 in 2016 during

I have made some edits but seek other editors’ expert opinions on its encyclopedic value and sourcing. Zuck28 (talk) 06:26, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Artists, Dance, Music, and India. Zuck28 (talk) 06:26, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Has very significant roles in
  WP:NACTOR.--Eva UX (talk) 11:28, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  What about significant coverage in secondary and reliable sources?

  Zuck28 (talk) 16:14, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  What about it? I've added a few secondary sources to the page. Also 1) I've added a source indicating she plays one of the four

  main characters in Kesari Veer (and see Leading actor) and the filmography can hardly be described as "misleading". 2) A page cannot "violate" WP:TOOSOON, which is an essay, not a policy but, most of all, citing that essay may have been useful back in 2017 but certainly not today, as she has now an already notable acting career 3) Stating that she has "made only minor appearances in films" is totally inaccurate, for that matter. I have no idea about potential conflicts of interest regarding the page but in its current state, it does not strike me as an issue. Eva UX (talk) 16:58, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

  ]

  There’s no

  wp:NEWSORGINDIA, and interviews.Zuck28 (talk) 08:52, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

  ]

  Even if that assessment was correct, she still would pass

  WP:BASIC indicates that "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability" (the different reviews in reliable sources of the 3 films she had lead roles in mention her performances with critical assessment and those mentions, some being brief, cannot be considered trivial nor passing mentions). Eva UX (talk) 16:26, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Keep per
  WP:NACTRESS. What secondary sources are you looking for, reviews suffice. The 2 interviews should be considered for sourcing since they are not the bulk of the sourcing. You can always tag the page for needing citations instead of deletion. DareshMohan (talk) 05:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  Interviews are primary sources and therefore unreliable for supporting claims in articles. While interviews can be used to establish that an interviewee made a particular statement, they are not considered reliable for verifying the accuracy of those statements. For example, this actress lied about her age in one of her Instagram posts, and later that post was used as a reference to manipulate the date of birth on Wikipedia. See

  wp:IV

  There are reviews of the movies as citations but none of them can really provide in-depth reporting. See

  Wp:SIGCOV

  .

  while someone passing Wp:NACTOR may be considered notable, but this is not always necessary.Zuck28 (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Meets notability criteria per
  WP:GNG. She has acted in films across major Indian language industries (Hindi, Telugu, and Kannada), with roles that received individual mention in professional reviews. The Times of India described her as "bold and glamorous," while The New Indian Express and Cinema Express included her debut in their critiques. In addition to her film roles, she has appeared in high-profile music videos performed by prominent artists like Badshah, Tiger Shroff, and Harrdy Sandhu — each of which has received notable media attention. Her modeling background, including participation in India’s Next Top Model, further supports a career with sustained media visibility. I think reliable sources, both mainstream and entertainment-specific, provide significant coverage of her career, satisfying the general notability guideline. Cinelatina (talk) 20:53, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep: Verifiably meets NACTOR through roles in Laila, Kesari Veer and Trivikrama. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 01:23, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Joey Pearson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet

Something to Say (Joey Pearson album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Novel (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Authentic (Joey Pearson album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Coeusin (talk) 13:26, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Artists, Bands and musicians, Music, and California Coeusin (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:19, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Non-notable singer. No sourcing found outside of social media. Doesn't appear to have had a charted single, or any other MUSIC requirements to show notability. Sourcing now in the article isn't helpful. Oaktree b (talk) 13:37, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete All - He had a couple of minor TV appearances as a budding child star in the early 2000s and got a record deal, but he never achieved any reliable media coverage of his singing career and I can find no pro reviews for any of his teenage albums. Then he faded back into normal life. The musician article and album articles have been sitting here with no references since that era and could have been deleted 17 years ago. Better late than never. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:26, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I'm less willing to assume that "sources must exist" for child stars. The current
  MySpace. Bearian (talk) 01:53, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: No SIGCOV in RS. No charting, certified gold or awards. I believe his albums should be nominated for deletion deleted too. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 04:27, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Hello @

  WP:BUNDLE. Coeusin (talk) 10:36, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

  ]

  Sorry, I meant they should be deleted too. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 15:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ToTheBones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Utter lack of

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Music. jellyfish ✉ 00:27, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. As stated above, lack of
  significant, reliable coverage. 🟥⭐ ^{talk to me!} 04:15, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep The group looks likely to meet
  WP:MUSIC with coverage from, e.g., The Guardian ([1]), NME ([2]), The Line of Best Fit ([3]), and Drowned in Sound ([4]). I doubt this exhausts their 2008-era coverage (going to paper probably necessary for much more). Chubbles (talk) 05:43, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:43, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Delete: No SIGCOV in RS. No awards, charting, certified gold. The band hasn't posted on Myspace or Facebook in the last 7 years. Their website is down. I only found a couple of Youtube videos from 11 and 13 years ago. I also found a few more sources but from many years ago. Most likely they have disbanded. Either way notability is not met. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 18:15, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Aside from the SIGCOV identified by Chubbles, I found: [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. We indeed don't know whether they didbanded or not, but there are enough coverage of their work to keep the article. —LastJabberwocky (Rrarr) 03:46, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I also found some of those sources. The 3 articles in the town newspaper (The Bolton News) and the NME blog doesn't seem important enough to me. The BBC News articles are also local. About Chubbles' sources, two are online music magazines which are difficult to asses as reliable. The Guardian and the NME article are the only sources I would consider useful, and perhaps the BBC ones.— Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 19:19, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep plenty of reliable sources coverage such as The Guardian, BBC, NME. Also coverage in
  WP:GNG in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Keep: I've changed my vote accordingly. The Guardian, Drowned in Sound and The Line of Best Fit are RS. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 23:31, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Can we get a source analysis?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:15, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Green Monkey Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe this indie record label passes

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and Washington. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:06, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm in the process of finding WP:IRS and was able to find one today from The Rocket magazine https://washingtondigitalnewspapers.org/?a=d&d=RCT19860401.1.9&srpos=2&e=-------en-20-RCT-1--txt-txIN-green+monkey+records------ I assume it is acceptable. If not please let me know. I will add more content and WP:IRS as time permits. I am fairly new here as far as contributing. Otheriver (talk) 23:49, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I do consider that a

  WP:AUD – The Rocket at the time was a small, Seattle-based music magazine. My search also turned up some additional The Rocket articles, but are you able to find additional sources that cover the subject in-depth? Mbdfar (talk) 18:55, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

  ]

  I'm not sure yet. I'm still at the beginning of my research. I was going to check a Seattle Times article the same day, but it was behind a paywall. I have some other places I need to check and read yet. Otheriver (talk) 01:59, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep there are enough sources to establish notability given that there is less media available online from that time frame. Also the label had a few established acts. Darkm777 (talk) 18:51, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Where are these sources that establish notability? Mbdfar (talk) 19:09, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I had tagged this in 2023 and see nothing that has taken place since that time to establish notability (a quick BEFORE search finds nothing meeting
  WP:NCORP. --CNMall41 (talk) 07:52, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sonat-Verlag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find any significant coverage on them. Darkm777 (talk) 21:38, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Business. Darkm777 (talk) 21:38, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Germany. Shellwood (talk) 21:58, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Destinyokhiria 💬 20:37, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Spoke Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unusual one. This was a page for two record labels. I was going to nominate it after the founder of one of them was deleted. Then, Cielquiparle added references and removed the one I was going to nominate. The problem is that none of them meeet

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and Texas. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:04, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• keep This article is about a 1980s-90s publisher in the United States. There are cited two sources which are about artists whom this publisher featured, and those articles each describe the publisher in a few sentences. For pre-internet sourcing on paper newspapers, I have lower expectations for what constitutes GNG, and I feel this passes. Also, I have lower expectations for how much content we need for Wikipedia articles on publishers, because I favor the editorial practice of being more inclusive of Wikipedia content on publishers based on the essay Wikipedia:Notability (media). I recognize that this article could only ever be a few sentences, but describing publishers is a specialty that I think works well for Wikipedia. Bluerasberry (talk) 16:22, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Wikipedia doesn't have such a "specialty". This label was nowhere near influential. Geschichte (talk) 06:30, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete doesn't have enough reliable sources. I might have agreed to keep if the label had notable releases with reviews, but it doesn't appear so.Darkm777 (talk) 00:46, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:45, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:44, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non notable record label, only made 10 songs. Fails

WP:NMUSIC. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 00:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

Nagamani Srinath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Women, Music, and Indiana. CNMall41 (talk) 18:30, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete - per nom. SachinSwami (talk) 18:50, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Per Nomination Destinyokhiria (talk) 07:23, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: if the Sangeet Natak Akademi Award is really "the highest Indian recognition given to people in the field of performing arts.", then this loks like notability. PamD 15:16, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Note that she has an article in Telugu Wikipedia - I have merged her two records in Wikidata, so it now shows as a link from the en.wiki article. PamD 15:41, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Wikidata merge. I understand your contention but do not believe notability is inherent for simply winning an award. --CNMall41 (talk) 15:48, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:MUSICBIO, criteria 7 and 8 appear to be met, unless you consider that 8 only applies to western popular music. PamD 19:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

No, I think something on the level the award is being claimed to be would fall under that criteria so Western/India would have no bearing. What I am saying is that even with an award, we still need significant coverage. Just winning an award does not guarantee notability. It even specifically says "may" be notable under that criteria. The sources we have are pour such as this (presented in the comment below) which is clearly unreliable as

WP:NEWSORGINDIA. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:14, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

• Comment- In addition to the Sangeet Natak Akademi Award, Nagamani Srinath was also honored with the Rajyotsava Award in 1998, the second-highest civilian honor conferred by the Karnataka Government[12]. Furthermore, according to an article published in The New Indian Express on June 22, 2015, she was awarded the Sangita Kala Acharya Award by the Madras Music Academy, Chennai, for her outstanding contributions to the field of Carnatic music[13].-SachinSwami (talk) 16:35, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  According to this source she has won some other notable awards such as Karnataka Kalashree. Also she has significant coverage in The Hindu and Deccan Herald.Afstromen (talk) 05:42, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Hello Afstromen, all the sources I included don’t fully support the claim; they are all weak. Mentioning an award alone isn’t enough; you need sources that clearly reference Nagamani Srinath’s work, like a review. For example, in

  WP:GNG. Though the rules for films and individuals differ, reviews clearly referencing the work are sufficient for support. (I have no intention of misleading editors, so I apologize.) SachinSwami (talk) 08:39, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

  ]

@Afstromen: you duplicated one of the sources which could indicate you did not look closely enough at them to see they are mainly routine announcements. --CNMall41 (talk) 15:54, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41 Are you talking about The Hindu article or both?Afstromen (talk) 17:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You listed the DH twice in your comment. Both the DH and The Hindu are her giving the information by the way. Interviews and all content provided by her so not independent. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:34, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh No, I listed the source initially to point the awards. It was not my intention to list it twice or to give the impression that the sources were different. Afstromen (talk) 17:50, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see that now. Thanks for the explanation. I still maintain that neither of those are independent. I would also think if she won the "highest award" as claimed, there would be more than just NEWSORGINDIA and a few interview type references. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 04:27, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:31, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Endorse
  WP:MUSICBIO#7-8; also this bio suggests that #11 (and to some extent #12) can also be met. There's more biographical information about the subject in (Rajagopalan 1990, pp. 171) harv error: no target: CITEREFRajagopalan1990 (help) though with limited online preview. Also, the use of "may" in MUSICBIO, to my understanding, means that the fulfilled criteria should be verifiable in reliable independent sources, and not that a significant coverage is required in addition. WeWake (talk) 12:09, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Can you address the rebuttal as well? There is no such thing as inherent notability. The "may" is there because it indicates the subject is likely notable, not that they "are" notable. Otherwise, why include may when it can be replaced with something more definite. Note

WP:BASIC ("presumed notable" but not "are notable"), which also covers "one event" which may apply as well. --CNMall41 (talk) 16:45, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

subject-specific understanding (of the community) of notability, and should be kept with {{Sources exist}} if existing are insufficient for a BLP. The SNGs allow us to contextualize the requirements of WP:BASIC and avoid a renewed reinterpretation with every article. The use of 'may' in that language broadly captures that these policies are consensus driven and evolve, and thus it cannot (possibly ever) prescribe a definitive criteria of notability. — WeWake (talk) 17:47, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

Worthy of notice would have more than just mentions or unreliable sourcing. I would agree a sources exist tag could be used, but that is assuming sources exist. They do not. All we have is what has been presented which falls short. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:22, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 15:19, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Including a source analysis table for reference as well (link here):

Source assessment table

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG ?
Sangeet Natak Akademi Award	govt. body	official bio	India's highest honor for arts	✔ Yes
The Hindu: Autobiography Feature		per RSPLIST	In-depth article on her book	✔ Yes
The Hindu: Festival Concludes		per RSPLIST	passing	✘ No
The Hindu: Disciples' Showcase		Per RSPLIST	passing	✘ No
News18: Concert Review	concert review	~ minus points lack of byline	performance review	~ Partial
Deccan Herald: Musicians Rue Lack			passing	✘ No
Deccan Herald: Feature	Independent feature		in-depth article on her career	✔ Yes
Deccan Chronicle: Different Artist			passing (award notification)	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

— WeWake (talk) 00:37, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Royal College Choir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Schools, and Sri Lanka. Obi2canibe (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:34, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Royal College, Colombo. Dan arndt (talk) 01:18, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Royal College, Colombo article. QEnigma (talk) 07:35, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Changed to keep from merge. New content and sources/references added ([14], [15]) QEnigma (talk) 16:18, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment No objection in principle to the merger suggestion but the article unsourced and I'm not sure it's appropriate to add this unsourced content to
  WP:SCHOOLCRUFT.--Obi2canibe (talk) 10:53, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  @Obi2canibe: I have removed unsourced content, performed a copy edit and added new information supported by sources/references that directly address the inception and history of the society. I trust these improvements are sufficient to justify retaining the article as a standalone entry. Best regards. QEnigma (talk) 16:09, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you. The DFT and Sunday Times sources certainly provide significant coverage but I'm not sure there's enough content to justify a separate article. Obi2canibe (talk) 14:17, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:04, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Wouldn't this be better as a disambiguation page? There are multiple different royal colleges and choirs. Like RMC London, [16], Regards. Govvy (talk) 13:00, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:14, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FyaVerse

• Grosvenor Light Opera Company (via WP:PROD on 22 March 2025)
• Zoo (Norwegian band) (via WP:PROD on 10 May 2025)
• Funk automotivo (via WP:PROD on 10 May 2025)