Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action of 26 May 2009

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:27, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Action of 26 May 2009

Action of 26 May 2009 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A only minor conflict that has no importance or significance, fails

WP:NEVENTS JayJayWhat did I do? 00:28, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Piracy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete by "not news." What we have is an attempted robbery with 7 people arrested and turned over to the proper authorities and no fatalities. The fact that it took place on the ocean does not make it notable.Kitfoxxe (talk) 01:03, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete
    WP:NOTNEWS. EricSerge (talk) 20:43, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete per above. GregJackP Boomer! 18:23, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Kitfoxxe. I questioned the notability in the first place, since it seemed very strange to describe this as a naval action (corresponding to a land battle) in the first place. Tomas e (talk) 19:10, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NOTNEWS: this is a routine event Nick-D (talk) 08:06, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.