Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adesola Kazeem Adeduntan

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Drmies (talk) 03:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adesola Kazeem Adeduntan

Adesola Kazeem Adeduntan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability. This is a declined speedy on the grounds that a borderline claim of significance has been made; however most of the references are essentially reports about the bank he works for. In other words, just a man doing his job. TheLongTone (talk) 13:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:04, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:04, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now as although I found links at Books, News, browser and Highbeam, there's nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 23:05, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep:- How on earth will this be
    t@lk to M£ 22:23, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 09:06, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep per
    WP:GNG. I'd like to see more secondary sources, but bankers in developing nations tend to be camera-shy for security reasons. Bearian (talk) 23:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:09, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.