Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrianna Franch (2nd nomination)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 00:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Adrianna Franch
AfDs for this article:
- Adrianna Franch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was restored on the basis that Ms. Franch had been drafted by
WP:NSPORT explicitly excludes players who have signed but not played for a club, and the league the club plays in is not confirmed as fully pro. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:22, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:25, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP per WP:NSPORT and have the article re-instated a second time or we can proactively contribute to Wikipedia so that articles are as current as possible and information is readily available to the general public about female athletes, including Adrianna Franch per Wikipedia:Five pillars. Hmlarson (talk) 18:48, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The sources listed are routine, making them insufficient for General notability. The first three inline citations and two of the external links are player profiles, four and twelve are match reports, five through eleven are routine transfer news, and thirteen is a squad announcement all of which falls under routine sports journalism. The third external link is self published and therefore not reliable. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:08, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP per
- Weak Keep, after checking the current sources, I think the article fails talk) 03:22, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - most of the sources relate to her being drafted - ]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Article meets talk) 19:33, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ]
- Franch is the first goalkeeper picked by any team in 2013 National Women's Soccer League college draft, and the first pick of a player by Western New York Flash. With Hope Solo, Nicole Barnhart in their thirties and and Jillian Loyden at 27; as a member of U-23 team she might still get her opportunity with the national team. It is a matter of weeks when she plays her first professional match. Harvardton (talk) 20:11, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Have you read talk) 19:02, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I read the news. As of January 5, 2013, Western New York Flash has the following roster: Carli Lloyd (USA) (MF), Abby Wambach (USA) (F), Bryanna McCarthy (CAN) (D), Jodi-Ann Robinson (CAN) (D), Veronica Perez (MEX) (F), Pamela Tajonar (MEX) (GK), Adriana Franch (GK), Amy Barczuk (MF), Vickie DiMartino (F), Jaclyn Logue (D). I believe this is a discussion page. At this time I have no other comment. Harvardton (talk) 05:16, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Have you read
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:22, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incredible. The editors will keep relisting this article, till they get what they want and delete this. "In general, debates should not be relisted more than twice"
talk) 17:00, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.