Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeveron
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Rather than relist this again, I'm treating it like an uncontested prod. Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aeveron
- Aeveron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails
WP:MUSIC. No notable label. Also, the languages are wrong. This is only on the english wiki, not the others. No touring, nothing about them on google. Delete Undead Warrior (talk) 22:41, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
I am also nominating the album pages:
- Demo (Aeveron album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Construality (Aeveron album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- The Ancient Realm (Aeveron album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Undead Warrior (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per nom. 75.172.24.170 (talk) 03:11, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Undead Warrior (talk) 03:25, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Undead Warrior (talk) 03:26, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xclamation point 00:16, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.