Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandra Coppinger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:22, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandra Coppinger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage, no truly notable roles. Being a main character in a single season show that isn't notable doesn't meet any WP inclusion criteria. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:55, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep a BBC produced series is always notable as it is reviewed in reliable sources, but only one notable role so only a weak keep Atlantic306 (talk) 14:05, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please point me to the guideline or policy that states "BBC produced series is always notable." Plenty of shows on notable networks fail and aren't notable. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:23, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:24, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TVSERIES suggests that nationally networked television shows are normally notable Atlantic306 (talk) 14:32, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Normally /= always. Also appearing or even starring in a non-notable series and one episode of another doesn't automatically meet NACTOR.

WP:NOTINHERITED covers it well. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:34, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete -- Fails
WP:BLP1E). Note that notability of a television show does not automatically transfer notability to the performers. At best, after deletion, the name could be redirected to Dead Gorgeous. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Strong delete The issue is not is the TV series that she appeared in notable. I am less than convinced it is, but for the time being I will grant for discussion purposes that this was a significant role in a notable production. The guideline says "multiple" significant roles that were in notable productions. A one-episode role does not rise to the level of significant, with very rare exceptions, so we lack the multiple significant roles, so she fails under that guideline and is not notable under any other guideline we have.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.