Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison Goodwin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 05:54, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alison Goodwin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I re-wrote this article to meet our guidelines for reliable secondary sources and neutrality, hoping I could discover notability for the subject. However, I fear that Alison Goodwin might fail

SarahStierch (talk) 17:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree, I wasn't able to find enough to prove notability, either.--CaroleHenson (talk) 05:42, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 17:04, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 17:04, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The standards for including visual artists is significant critical comment aboutt heir work & inclusion of their work in the permanent collection of major museums--which normally implies the presence of such discussions. This individual does not yet have either. 'DGG (at NYPL)' (talk) 18:16, 6 January 2014 (UTC),[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.