Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Almost Ready Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 04:56, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Almost Ready Records

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Record store in Brooklyn, also apparently a label. No notability for either. Previously tagged, PRODed in 2016, nothing much has changed in notability since then. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and United States of America. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:02, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A Google search finds no reliable sources about it, and only a few sites at all, mainly vinyl websites and social media. Definitely fails WP:GNG. JML1148 (talk) 08:53, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Accepted at AfC on the basis of the following significant coverage: [1], [2], [3] ~Kvng (talk) 15:54, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:38, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable, and those sources do not constitute "significant coverage", two don't pass
WP:SOAP. Acous mana 09:49, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per the sources Kvng listed. Only Brooklyn Magazine is reliable and gives significant coverage to the subject: 50 Third and 3rd has disclaimers in their T&C that implies no editorial review of articles (i.e., it's blog-quality material), and the Vice story covers the founder of the label, not the label itself. —C.Fred (talk) 11:58, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.