Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amantia peruana peruana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Amantia peruana. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 07:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amantia peruana peruana

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subspecies are not inherently notable, while species are. Author declines to merge to the species article. - UtherSRG (talk) 22:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. UtherSRG (talk) 22:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge both subspecies to species article. No benefit on the Lord's green Earth to splitting these off into separate articles - a paragraph of minuscule detail description certainly does not justify that. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:14, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is my expected outcome as
WP:ATD. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:39, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Merge No need for separate pages here. Reywas92^Talk 19:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm happy to !vote merge but note that the only thing here that isn't already on Amantia peruana is an unsourced sentence about etymology. Mgp28 (talk) 22:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.