Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Among the Fallen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Among the Fallen

Among the Fallen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly self-published novel written by non-notable author. Article is also primarily promotional. Drdisque (talk) 22:43, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• • Delete already speedied twice for the above reasons. According to one of the references it is not due for release for some months Porturology (talk) 09:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:06, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Should be

salted after this discussion is closed then. -Drdisque (talk) 15:33, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete - Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources, and in fact lacks significant coverage in even unreliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:20, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Yes, can't find anything on it; article not encyclopaedic; not notable; seems self-promotional. Chiswick Chap (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:09, 20 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete as per nom and Whpq. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 12:07, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.