Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anand Reddi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 02:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anand Reddi

Anand Reddi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Resume written by

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Health and fitness, Science, and United States of America. Jfire (talk) 01:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a Pubmed listing of the Google Scholar articles.... The publications appear to be in peer reviewed journals. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=%22anand+reddi%22. There also does appear to be a number of global health publications and focus Ajsk123 (talk) 23:55, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG ?
European AIDS Treatment Group	~ Advocacy organization	~	Reddi is quoted	✘ No
Highleyman	? Dead link	?	?	? Unknown
University of Michigan	It's his alma mater		Dead link, but presumably routine university PR	✘ No
"Leadership"			Failed verification	✘ No
BMC Pediatr.	Paper co-authored by Reddi			✘ No
The Telegraph			Quote and brief coverage. Doesn't support claims in the article that he was the "architect".	✘ No
The Guardian			Quote	✘ No
HuffPost Bio		~		✘ No
HuffPost article	OpEd written by Reddi			✘ No
HuffPost article (Emanuel)	OpEd reply			✘ No
HuffPost article	OpEd written by Reddi			✘ No
Devex			Quote	✘ No
Devex			Single mention	✘ No
Businesswire	Press release			✘ No
HuffPost article	OpEd written by Reddi			✘ No
"Human capital contracts..."	Paper co-authored by Reddi			✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Medicine, South Africa, Colorado, Maryland, and Michigan. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Disputed article about a researcher that fails
  WP:NPOL and needs rewriting from scratch! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. He does not seem to have become an academic physician (one with a faculty position at a medical school), and I don't think his student publications rise to the level of
  WP:GNG and the source analysis above, which I find convincing. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:28, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete: Fails
  WP:GNG. A journal search shows nothing significant since 2012, and only news results are a non-quote passing mention: so, nothing to invalidate the previous reasoning. Kimen8 (talk) 13:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.